Search results
1 – 2 of 2Sima Ajami and Mahshid Fattahi
The daily life of people is threatened by natural disasters. Crisis management is that in which attempts are made to before, during and after disasters. The most important factor…
Abstract
Purpose
The daily life of people is threatened by natural disasters. Crisis management is that in which attempts are made to before, during and after disasters. The most important factor for a manager to be able to overcome a crisis depends on his/her readiness before it. The main objective of this study was determining an earthquake information management system (EIMS) in Japan, Turkey and Iran and describing how it can reduce destruction by crisis management.
Design/methodology/approach
This study was an analytical comparison in which data were collected by questionnaire, observation and checklist. The subject was the EIMS in selected countries. Sources of information were staff in related organizations, scientific documentation and the internet. To analyze the findings, criteria rating technique, Delphi technique, and descriptive method were used.
Findings
Findings showed that the EIMSs in Japan, Turkey and Iran are decentralized. The EIMS is called “Phoenix” in Japan, and “natural disaster management information system” or “AFAYBIS” in Turkey. In Iran there was not a useful and efficient EIMS to evaluate earthquake information. According to outcomes, it is clear that an information system can only influence decisions if it is relevant, reliable and available for the decision‐makers in a timely fashion. Therefore, it is necessary to reform and design a model. The model contains responsible organizations and their functions.
Originality/value
This paper contains valuable information on EIMSs and their role in reducing destruction.
Details
Keywords
Dariush Alimohammadi and Mahshid Sajjadi
There are many differences in, and various opinions on, naming library education institutions around the world. In a number of countries, this diversity has increased a powerful…
Abstract
Purpose
There are many differences in, and various opinions on, naming library education institutions around the world. In a number of countries, this diversity has increased a powerful trend among library professionals to discuss and to challenge the problem of naming schools in which they are studying the discipline and the programs by which they are being taught. The present study, in response to this trend, aims to find out an adequate answer to this problem based on the real state of the librarianship's educational institutions on the World Wide Web.
Design/methodology/approach
After an introductory note, various opinions are classified into two categories. The diversity in interpretation of renaming schools is reviewed chronologically. The survey was done and a sufficient conclusion was presented.
Findings
More than 98.5 percent of the schools have renewed their titles, while fewer than 45 percent have changed their titles completely from the traditional forms to the newer ones.
Research limitations/implications
Relativeness of the industrialization concept is too much. Therefore, conceptualization for such research would usually be a big problem.
Practical implications
It was not possible to discover whether the titles of the schools were being changed when the survey was being done or not.
Originality/value
The results of this survey can solve the paradox of renaming schools.
Details