Search results

Patient safety indicators (PSIs) were developed as a tool for hospitals to identify potentially preventable complications and improve patient safety performance. The study aimed at measuring the incidence of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) PSI03 (pressure ulcer [PU] rate) and to identify the association between PSI03 and clinical outcomes including death, readmission within 30 days and length of stay (LOS) at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital at Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

An exploratory prospective cohort study was conducted to follow up patients, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, from admission until one month after discharge at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital. Data were collected through basic information and follow-up sheets. The total number of included participants in the study was 330.

PSI03 incidence rate was 67.7 per 1,000 discharges. Patients aged 60 years and above had the highest risk among all age groups. In patients who developed PSI03, the risk ratio (RR) of death was 8.8 [95% CI (3.79–20.24)], RR of staying more than 30 days at the hospital was 1.5 [95% CI (1.249–1.872)] and of readmission within 30 days in patients who developed PSI03 was 1.5 [95% CI (0.38–6.15)]. In the study’s hospital, the patients who developed PSI03 were at higher risk of death and stayed longer at the hospital than patients without PSI03. This study demonstrated a clear association between PSI03 and patient outcomes such as LOS and mortality. Early detection, prevention and proper management of PSI03 are recommended to decrease unfavorable clinical outcomes.

The importance of PSIs lies in the fact that they facilitate the recognition of the adverse events and complications which occurred during hospitalization and give the hospitals a chance to improve the possible clinical outcomes. Therefore, the current study aimed at measuring the association between AHRQ PSI03 ( PU rate) and the clinical outcomes including death, readmission within 30 days and the LOS at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital at Ain Shams University. This study will provide the hospital management with baseline data for this type of adverse event and guide them to develop a system for identifying the high-risk group of patients and to upgrade relevant hospital policies and guidelines that lead to improved patient outcomes.

Intensive care unit performance evaluation is usually affected by variations in the severity of inpatients' health status. This paper aims, therefore, to standardize two performance measures: intensive care unit survival and length of stay using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) severity of illness score.

A records study in three Ain Shams University Hospital intensive care units, from January 1‐December 31, 2003 was carried out to examine illness severity effect using APACHE II, length of stay and survival. Retrospective data were used to model length of stay in days and the survival using the APACHE II score as a predictor. This was followed by a prospective study to monitor the standardized measures in two intensive care units for one year.

APACHE II scores predicted length of stay of those who were discharged and control charts for severity‐adjusted length of stay were drawn up. The APACHE II score predicted survival for those with APACHE II score >16. The model is significant with a specificity of 89.9 percent while sensitivity was 25 percent. Control charts for severity‐adjusted mortality were drawn up to monitor mortality.

Only 60 percent of the files examined in the retrospective part of the study had enough data to calculate APACHE II scores.

Standardized APACHE II severity of illness score can monitor intensive care unit length of stay and mortality.

The paper underlines the need to implement a standardized measurement system to evaluate intensive care patient outcomes.