Search results
1 – 10 of 12Paul De Lange, Lyn Daff and Beverley Jackling
Publishing in scholarly journals is a practical necessity for academics. Put simply, this reality can be described as āpublish or perishā. To be treated as a serious contender for…
Abstract
Purpose
Publishing in scholarly journals is a practical necessity for academics. Put simply, this reality can be described as āpublish or perishā. To be treated as a serious contender for tenure and promotion, scholarly research and activities directed towards publication are necessary aspects of faculty life. The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into ādealingā with the editorial review process of publishing from the perspective of a relatively new author.
Design/methodology/approach
Using the lens of Q and R theory, a case study approach combined with critical reflection provides a documented tour to enable other authors to enhance their understanding of the publication process through including references to associated reviews and correspondence with a journal editor. The review extracts from the editor and authorsā responses are discussed within the context of a theoretical schema and timeline.
Findings
Drawing from the theoretical schema, the paper identifies 11 lessons learned along the way to publishing, and these are summarised as the 11 commandments of publishing.
Research limitations/implications
Utilisation of the Q and R theory can assist researchers as they reflect on how to maximise their publication outcomes.
Practical implications
The 11 commandments provide a practical approach for those wanting to improve their understanding and likelihood of publishing success.
Originality/value
The originality of this paper is that it considers the publication process from a novice author who subsequently draws on the knowledge of more experienced co-authors. The findings are based on a theoretical schema that is transferable and able to be adopted by others to guide publication outcomes.
Details
Keywords
The not-for-profit (NFP) context displays unique characteristics that include stakeholder diversity, multiple stakeholder agendas, and the pervasiveness of philanthropic values…
Abstract
Purpose
The not-for-profit (NFP) context displays unique characteristics that include stakeholder diversity, multiple stakeholder agendas, and the pervasiveness of philanthropic values and related organisational mission. This study investigated accountantsā perceptions of NFPsā characteristics that enable and inhibit their communication along with the strategies they adopt to overcome their communication challenges.
Design/methodology/approach
This qualitative interview-based study is informed by Giddensā structuration theory. Thirty NFP accountants, from three Australian states, were interviewed. Thematic analysis was used to identify the relationships between NFP organisational characteristics and accountantsā communication strategies, and their interactions with organisational structures.
Findings
The study reveals important relationships between many stakeholders with limited financial acumen, organisational resource constraints, the currency of NFP information technologies, the dominance of operational mission over financial imperatives, and the supply of organisational accountants. Accountantsā structural adaptations emerge in their adopting multiple forms of communications reframing.
Research limitations/implications
The NFP environment exhibits a mix of characteristics, some of which pose challenges for accountantsā communication while others facilitate their communication.
Social implications
Increasingly, governments are relying on NFPs for the provision of services once provided by the state. Enhancing NFP accountantsā communication has the potential to improve outcomes for NFPs.
Originality/value
The study broadens prior research on accountantsā communication beyond formal written reporting to recognise and articulate their informal communication strategies.
Details
Keywords
The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into the importance of accountantsā networks inside organisations, the parties who comprise those networks and how accountants go…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into the importance of accountantsā networks inside organisations, the parties who comprise those networks and how accountants go about building and maintaining their networks. It also illustrates the use of strong structuration theory, which specifically considers the networks that surround agents. The theoretical discussion highlights the significance of communication as agency in the context of accounting practice through a strong structuration perspective.
Design/methodology/approach
A qualitative approach to the inquiry was adopted. Interviews were conducted with 30 Australian accountants from 22 not-for-profit organisations. A thematic approach was used to analyse the transcripts. Structuration theory, supplemented by strong structuration, informed the study.
Findings
The interviewees attested to the importance of communication and developing networks within their organisations. They actively sought to expand and enhance their networks. The accountants played a pivotal role in networks and they pursued both horizontal and vertical relations. The accountantsā knowledge of organisational positions and perceptions of their own roles were used strategically in attempts to alter the internal structures of networked others.
Research limitations/implications
The interviewed accountants worked in not-for-profit organisations and this may influence the findings. Future research might consider accountants working in for-profit organisations. The study provides insights into strategies to develop intra-organisational networks.
Originality/value
The study contributes to the meagre literature regarding accountantsā networks within organisations. It provides insights that may assist accountants in enhancing their own networks. Although structuration theory is well-established in accounting research, the enrichments offered by strong structuration are illustrated in this study.
Details
Keywords
Reflections on pertinent questions of accountability that should be asked when restructuring occurs in tertiary education.
Abstract
Purpose
Reflections on pertinent questions of accountability that should be asked when restructuring occurs in tertiary education.
Design/methodology/approach
Fictional poem.
Findings
Meditation on the impact of restructuring in tertiary education; what drives it and what are the results?
Research limitations/implications
Stimulates thought about the restructuring process and how it is approached, as well as the cost and benefits of restructuring.
Originality/value
An individual comment on issues often overlooked in restructuring.
Details
Keywords
The purpose is to reflect on writing a PhD proposal.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose is to reflect on writing a PhD proposal.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper is a poem based on the author's experience.
Findings
This is meditation on how the topic, theory and method for a research project all need to be fineātuned, so they are in balance.
Research limitations/implications
The paper stimulates thought about what drives a research project, and that various adaptations are required, so the topic theory, and method are woven together in harmony.
Originality/value
The paper provides an insight into the preparation of a research proposal, and highlights that it is not a linear process, driven only by the topic.
Details
Keywords
This poem aims to reflect on the process of preparing a successful ethics application and likens it to facing a giant.
Abstract
Purpose
This poem aims to reflect on the process of preparing a successful ethics application and likens it to facing a giant.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper is a poem reflecting on factors that hinder and aid a successful ethics application and emotions that applicants may experience during the process.
Findings
Achieving a successful ethics application requires attention to detail, knowledge of the process and persistence. Accountability falls heavily on the applicant while the committee wants to minimise risk for the university. One can experience a range of emotions during the application process.
Research limitations/implications
While the findings reflect the author's experience they are nevertheless often privately discussed amongst academics.
Originality/value
The paper brings to light issues that ethics applicants experience that are seldom publicly discussed.
Details