Leana Bouffard and Amanda Goodson
Definitions of rape and sexual aggression have varied widely in the research literature, resulting in a wide range of estimates for perpetration and remaining questions as to the…
Abstract
Purpose
Definitions of rape and sexual aggression have varied widely in the research literature, resulting in a wide range of estimates for perpetration and remaining questions as to the factors that may affect involvement in sexual violence. The paper aims to discuss this issue.
Design/methodology/approach
The current study uses a sample of college men to assess multiple forms of measurement of sexual aggression and theoretical predictors.
Findings
Findings indicate that the different measures of sexual aggression (broad vs narrow; hypothetical vs behavioral) are significantly correlated with each other. Additionally, many theoretical predictors (rape myths, low self-control, sexual entitlement, and pornography use) are consistently related to all measurement forms. However, some variables (masculinity, peer support for violence against women, sexual partners, and alcohol and drug use) are only related to broad measures of sexual aggression, and some are related only to hypothetical (i.e. certainty of apprehension) or behavioral measures (i.e. fraternity membership).
Research limitations/implications
Because of the chosen approach, the results may lack generalizability. Findings do, however, point to important considerations in defining sexual aggression moving forward.
Practical implications
Results point to the importance of aiming policy and programs at the particular characteristics that most consistently impact sexual aggression.
Originality/value
This paper addresses lingering questions about the impact of differences in definition and measurement on understanding sexual aggression.