The purpose of this paper is to explore the connections between autopoiesis, as described by Maturana and Varela, and Bakhtin's work on dialogue in understanding successful…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore the connections between autopoiesis, as described by Maturana and Varela, and Bakhtin's work on dialogue in understanding successful organizational rhetoric.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper reviews two foundational texts in order to see the connection between them.
Findings
The concept of “organizational closure” will govern the domain of communication and therefore also any act in rhetoric.
Originality/value
This is a first attempt to link “organizational closure” as it exists in autopoiesis to Bakhtin's notion of a superaddressee.
Details
Keywords
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the differences between objective language and narratives and how differences affect rhetoric.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore the differences between objective language and narratives and how differences affect rhetoric.
Design/methodology/approach
Conceptual implications are drawn from an analysis and discussion of the literature in the fields of autopoiesis, meanings and narratives.
Findings
Only narratives convey the experience of objectivity, which makes them more effective to persuade people to change than just providing “objective” data and explanatory knowledge.
Originality/value
The paper discusses how the projection of meaning is not an experience but knowledge. Meaning is experienced as an empirical property of the perceived.
Details
Keywords
Marja Flory and Oriol Iglesias
The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss a critical review of the role of rhetoric and narratives in management research and practice.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss a critical review of the role of rhetoric and narratives in management research and practice.
Design/methodology/approach
Conceptual implications are drawn from the analysis and discussion of the papers of this special issue, as well as from previous literature.
Findings
Managers and researchers will be unable to explore the potential of narratives and stories fully if, at the same time, they do not deeply comprehend the underpinnings of rhetoric.
Originality/value
The paper further discusses the role of rhetoric and narratives in management research and practice and also explores the relationships between rhetoric and narratives.
Details
Keywords
To identify the Transcendental Essence of Humanity, the purpose of this paper is to describe in brief what kind of research became possible when the theory of, e.g. autopoiesis…
Abstract
Purpose
To identify the Transcendental Essence of Humanity, the purpose of this paper is to describe in brief what kind of research became possible when the theory of, e.g. autopoiesis, Husserl’s Transcendental Consciousness and the theory of Rhodes and Thame came together to form a “transcendental” interview methodology.
Design/methodology/approach
Critical conceptual implications are drawn to form a new research method to explore a de-subjectified inner domain and to search for a possible common essence of humanity.
Findings
A Transcendental Emotional Reference was found practically alien to contemporary perspectives. Still, the reference governs the emotional structure of human experience. This different perspective answers basic questions of morality, organization theory and leadership.
Research limitations/implications
The findings of the new research open a new and transparent perspective answering Grey’s question: “What is it to be human?” (Grey, p. 47, 2014.) A perspective shedding new light on the humanities. A research limitation is the number of respondents. Still, being transcendental the findings are theoretically valid for all.
Originality/value
The paper is based on a unique research enabling 32+ (ongoing research) respondents to explore their own and universally shared Transcendental domain.