Nearly $200 billion a year is funneled through the federal procurement system to buy everything from paper clips to stealth fighters. This procurement system can be thought of as…
Abstract
Nearly $200 billion a year is funneled through the federal procurement system to buy everything from paper clips to stealth fighters. This procurement system can be thought of as an oscillating pendulum as it swings from one extreme of unresponsiveness to mission needs to the other extreme of hypersensitivity to mission. Out of a sense that the procurement pendulum had swung too far towards overregulation, two major procurement reform laws were passed: the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 and the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996. Many observers suggest that these two laws have led to a revolution in the way the government buys. Are these reforms permanent? The view here is they are not because of various political forces.
Most theory and empirical research on the impact of e‐government on citizens' trust in government remains at the macro‐level and misses out on the complexities of the interaction…
Abstract
Purpose
Most theory and empirical research on the impact of e‐government on citizens' trust in government remains at the macro‐level and misses out on the complexities of the interaction between e‐services and citizens' trust in government. The purpose of this paper is to provide a deeper understanding of this complexity.
Design/methodology/approach
The research strategy is a comparative case study of two e‐services in Chile: a tax administration and an e‐procurement system. Data were collected from a variety of users (citizens and business owners) and public sector employees in the Araucania Region in Chile.
Findings
Within e‐services, the most easily perceived and influential trustworthiness cues are those outcomes that directly impact the citizen. These cues shape citizens' resultant interpretations of and trust in the public sector agency. Furthermore, the direction of this influence is mediated by individuals' particular circumstances and value positions. Key to understanding the process of building and destroying trust is the identification of the value conflicts that can emerge from e‐service implementations and how they align with citizens' values.
Research limitations/implications
The research conclusions are potentially an artefact of the financial nature of the e‐service transactions and the cultural uniqueness of Chileans.
Originality/value
The paper presents an original integrated conception of trust and institutional trust as well as a comparative analysis of citizens' perceptions and interpretations of “successful” e‐services.