Since its inception, the primary objective of Research in Political Sociology (RPS) has been to publish original, high quality manuscripts to increase our understanding of…
Abstract
Since its inception, the primary objective of Research in Political Sociology (RPS) has been to publish original, high quality manuscripts to increase our understanding of political structures and processes. RPS and the American Sociological Association's Section on Political Sociology share this goal, and the publication cooperates with the section to achieve sociological understanding of political phenomena.
J. Kenneth Benson and Byung-Soo Kim
New institutionalisms in economic and organizational sociology need grounding in theories of capitalism. Comparative studies show that multiple, viable forms of capitalism have…
Abstract
New institutionalisms in economic and organizational sociology need grounding in theories of capitalism. Comparative studies show that multiple, viable forms of capitalism have been constructed through the interplay of institutions, mobilizations of political power, and state policies. Further theoretical development requires attention to the contradictions of capitalism. Promising theoretical sources for this task are examined. The political process produces new forms of capitalist institutions, but contradictions built into those institutions cannot be fully resolved and provide the basis for new acts of social construction and power mobilization. The power and cultural arguments of the comparative institutionalists are joined, at least in aspiration, to theories of capitalist contradictions.
The success of Research in Political Sociology depends on the community of scholars in many ways. I am grateful to the advisory editors (see above) who reviewed manuscripts and…
Abstract
The success of Research in Political Sociology depends on the community of scholars in many ways. I am grateful to the advisory editors (see above) who reviewed manuscripts and provided advice on editorial decisions. I also owe a special debt of gratitude to the colleagues listed below who served as referees in the peer review process and reviewed one or more manuscripts for Volume 16 of Research in Political Sociology.
The chapters in this section examine the exercise of power in two distinct policy arenas. Whereas Val Burris examines the interlocking networks among policy planning…
Abstract
The chapters in this section examine the exercise of power in two distinct policy arenas. Whereas Val Burris examines the interlocking networks among policy planning organizations, Clayton Peoples and Michael Gortari compare the effects of political action committee contributions on the voting behavior of elected officials in the U.S. and Canada.
J. Kenneth Benson is a professor Emeritus in the Department of Sociology, University of Missouri-Columbia. He continues to work on the development of a dialectical approach to the…
Abstract
J. Kenneth Benson is a professor Emeritus in the Department of Sociology, University of Missouri-Columbia. He continues to work on the development of a dialectical approach to the study of organizations, networks, and public policies. He also is working currently on religion and the professions. His work has been published in the Administrative Science Quarterly, The Sociological Quarterly, and other journals and edited volumes.