Search results

The purpose of this paper is to establish a conceptual framework on how hospitality and tourism educators could incorporate new technology and big data analytics into program curriculum.

The research developed a logic model to visualize the benefits/impact of hospitality and tourism data analyst via a literature review approach.

The incorporation of statistics, research and the knowledge of data exploration, analysis and insight into hospitality programs would enhance students’ data analysis competencies.

This is a literature review paper, based on philosophical perspectives from literature review. It would be nice to conduct an empirical study with regard to data analytics in the hospitality and tourism industry.

The hospitality and tourism program coordinators and/or directors are urged to inspire more students who are interested in adding statistics and accounting studies to the hospitality and tourism field. Also, the hospitality and tourism data analyst would secure attractive job offers as well as enhance the average salary of hospitality and tourism graduates.

Hospitality and tourism data analytics would secure attractive job offers as well as enhance the average salary of hospitality and tourism graduates.

The paper explored the impact of big data analytics in the hospitality and tourism industry and made recommendations for hospitality and tourism data analytics curricula.

酒店/旅游课程设置是否做好了迎接大数据时代的准备？

本论文旨在建立一个概念模型, 以指导酒店旅游教育者们如何引进新科技和大数据分析到现有的课程设置里.

本论文通过文献综述的方式, 提出一个logic模型以描画酒店旅游数据分析的好处/影响。

酒店课程里加入统计、研究方法和数据勘探的内容对于帮助学生提高数据分析能力有帮助。

本论文采用概述的形式, 以文献综述的角度, 建立理论模型。如果可以加入实际模型测试, 比如针对酒店旅游业做实际的数据分析, 那么结果将更加丰富。

酒店旅游项目协调员和/或负责人应该鼓励更多对统计和会计有兴趣的学生从事酒店旅游业。此外, 酒店旅游数据分析员将获得令人羡慕的工作机会和优越的薪资以提高酒店旅游毕业生的平均薪资水平。

本论文探索了大数据分析在酒店旅游业中的影响, 以及对酒店旅游数据分析课程设置做出建议。

大数据分析, 酒店旅游数据分析员, 数据科学家, 统计学和研究能力, 酒店旅游教育家, 运动学分析

文献评论

This study aims to consider how the degree of participation at various hierarchical levels impacts action plan implementation success and firm financial performance. Specifically, the study seeks to assess the relationship among organizational structure, involvement by top management, middle management, lower management and frontline employees and its effect on firm performance; and, when controlling for firm size and industry segment membership, the effect of the relationship among direct involvement effects and interacting involvement effects on performance.

The study used survey methodology and a random sample of members in a US state restaurant association. The analysis included comparisons between groups using independent sample t tests and hierarchical regression to assess direct and interacting effects.

The findings indicate that, regardless of firm size or industry segment, the direct effects of greater top management involvement and the interaction effects of one three‐way interaction (middle management, lower management, and frontline staff) and the four‐way interaction led to higher levels of action plan success. For the longer‐term impact on financial performance, higher participative approaches used by top management and frontline staff were significantly associated with higher overall profits and financial success.

The sample was drawn from a specific region in the USA and may not be generalizable. The study attempts to minimize the potential for non‐response bias and to ensure inter‐rater reliability but these potential threats to validity cannot be totally ruled out.

In general, higher top management participatory approaches are important to enhance financial and strategy implementation success, regardless of firm size. The interaction of participation by all levels of the firm is a useful approach to increase the likelihood of strategy implementation success. Top management and frontline employee participation are critical organizational levels for enhancing participative management approaches and ultimately increasing financial performance for all foodservice firms.

The value of this study is the consideration of the impact of participation by degree across four hierarchical levels on firm performance and plan execution success.