Oluwatoyin Sorinmade, Geraldine Strathdee, Catherine Wilson, Belinda Kessel and Obafemi Odesanya
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate health professionals' fidelity to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) principles on determining mental capacity and arriving at best interests…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate health professionals' fidelity to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) principles on determining mental capacity and arriving at best interests decisions in the care of individuals found to lack the relevant decision‐making capacity.
Design/methodology/approach
A retrospective review of the case records of 68 patients previously determined by clinicians as lacking mental capacity in at least one of three identified areas: treatment consenting capacity, capacity to decide on place of abode and capacity to manage financial affairs, was conducted. Notes were examined to determine how mental capacity was assessed and the process of arriving at best interests decisions in the care of the non‐capacitous individuals.
Findings
It was difficult to locate relevant entries as there were no designated folders for MCA related issues. There were (mostly) minimal entries made about the assessment process, only patchy documentation of the legal criteria used in capacity assessment, and which of the criteria the patient did not fulfil. Clinicians only partially followed the procedure prescribed by the MCA in determining best interests of non‐capacitous patients.
Originality/value
This paper highlights the need for health care professionals to better adhere to the principles of the MCA in assessing mental capacity and in determining the best interests of non‐capacitous individuals. Health care professionals and the public need to be better informed of the provisions of the MCA.
Details
Keywords
The purpose of this paper is to relate the health services’ prevention imperative to a new priority area, youth suicide.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to relate the health services’ prevention imperative to a new priority area, youth suicide.
Design/methodology/approach
The content is based on the latest UK policy documents and participation in recent events for policy-makers.
Findings
Suicide among young people is increasing, and traditional approaches are not reducing these deaths. Involving young people as researchers or trainers has been helpful, and policy-makers need to address the present social and cultural risk factors.
Research limitations/implications
Evidence differs between countries, and a local context may be important.
Practical implications
In the UK, local profiles are being developed and there is an increasing need identified for relevant training for a wide range of professionals.
Social implications
The participation of young people in developments may be emancipatory, for all concerned.
Originality/value
Because this year, young persons’ mental health will be an international priority, this may be the time to galvanise action for improved planning and resources for the prevention of youth suicide.