Mateus Panizzon, Gabriel Vidor and Maria Emília Camargo
Continuous understanding of the best practices associated with new product development is a constant research opportunity to advance knowledge in the field, as far as changes in…
Abstract
Purpose
Continuous understanding of the best practices associated with new product development is a constant research opportunity to advance knowledge in the field, as far as changes in the business environment and the increasing turbulence level in different market segments create and reposition the importance of practices over time.
Design/methodology/approach
Based on a systematic review, the study aimed to analyze the 100 most relevant articles published in international journals on new product development (NDP), identifying new patterns on the best practices for new product development and the types of relationship involved in NPD.
Findings
Among the several practices observed in the literature, the analysis point to a larger group of studies that converge on the identification of a positive and significant relationship in integration – simultaneously – between supplier, company, customers and strategic alliances and the performance of NPD.
Research limitations/implications
These results support integration as a cross-cutting and structural best practice for NPD, as long as it is constituted as a capacity, mainly applied in highly turbulent environments. This approach supported the proposition of a new framework.
Practical implications
Organizations will be able to implement the proposed framework to NPD strategy in order to prioritize resources in best practices, aiming to increase the performance of new product development.
Social implications
The adoption of integration and co-creation practices for the development of new products expands the possibilities of economic and social development, based on the involvement of the actors in this network.
Originality/value
This model had not yet been proposed in the literature, filling a gap in the agenda for future studies.
Details
Keywords
Gabriel Vidor, Janine Fleith de Medeiros, Flavio Sanson Fogliatto and Mitchel M. Tseng
– This paper aims to propose a method to determine which mass customization (MC) characteristics should be prioritized in mass-customized service design.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to propose a method to determine which mass customization (MC) characteristics should be prioritized in mass-customized service design.
Design/methodology/approach
Looking at manufacturing MC systems and conducting a literature review, it is not possible to observe a methodological step to define customized service design as the one we propose in this work. Results show a systematic classification of MC characteristics based on MC enablers and service enablers. These enablers are related by a quality function deployment (QFD) matrix and rewritten using a reverse QFD procedure.
Findings
In the end, it was possible to determine which characteristics should be prioritized in mass-customized services.
Research limitations/implications
Two case studies were performed: one with an electric power supplier and another one with a university.
Practical implications
It shows that despite easy customization, organization is not always interest in service features customization. The explanation in these two cases is customization cost, which compared to the benefit does not seem advantageous for the organization.
Originality/value
This paper creates a methodology to design a first phase in customized services in Latin American services and that is the original contribution.