The purpose of this short paper is to re‐examine corporate social responsibility (CSR) in terms of the ethical criterion of “greenness” through an assessment of one company's…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this short paper is to re‐examine corporate social responsibility (CSR) in terms of the ethical criterion of “greenness” through an assessment of one company's response to green consumers during the past number of years.
Design/methodology/approach
The ethical evaluation proceeds along the lines of a case study analysis of the significance of “green” as a value and the likely implications for a company.
Findings
There is a need for all companies to shift to Kantian responsibility with the appointment of a chief ethical officer and creation of an ethics department in an attempt to balance the short‐term profit‐oriented pursuit and the long‐term pursuit of fulfilling one's duty.
Research limitations/implications
The paper addresses the ethical issue of “greenness” from a Kantian perspective of fulfilling one's duty.
Practical implications
Public companies should adopt full transparency on CSR so that the public can be assured that the company is ethical and acting in an ethical manner.
Originality/value
The paper provides a brief application of a Kantian time‐variant responsibility in terms of fulfilment of one's duty now to be a green company. It asks: how can a company best achieve “greenness” as a time‐invariant ethical standard?