Peter Koveos and Dipinder Randhawa
The objective of this study is to analyze the framework within which microfinance institutions (MFIs) deliver their services and provide an assessment of their operations and…
Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze the framework within which microfinance institutions (MFIs) deliver their services and provide an assessment of their operations and financial management. These institutions are examined because of their current importance to a special group of consumers, primarily the poor and disenfranchised in the developing world, and of their future promise as an economic development solution. Since the objective of these institutions is somewhat unique, the manner of their assessment must also differ from that used to assess the performance of traditional financial intermediaries. In particular, assessment of MFIs must recognize their dual (bank and development instrument) status. Their efficiency, then, must be analyzed in terms of its economic (or financial) dimension as well as its social dimension. The first dimension may be examined with traditional measures, while examination of the second requires measures that reflect the MFI’s social objectives. In order to accommodate the special nature of MFIs, this study proposes the use of a Balanced Scorecard approach. It contributes to the study of financial institution performance by examining a non‐traditional group of institutions using a variety of assessment measures. The findings should be of value to those interested in the financial sector as well as those involved in public policy decision making.
Details
Keywords
Guan H. Lim and Dipinder S. Randhawa
Hong Kong and Singapore are economically similar and rival international financial centers. Banks in both Hong Kong and Singapore operate in very similar environments…
Abstract
Hong Kong and Singapore are economically similar and rival international financial centers. Banks in both Hong Kong and Singapore operate in very similar environments: internationally oriented with protected domestic banking market and firm regulators. With liberalization under the Financial Services Accord of the World Trade Organization (WTO), comes more competition and the growing importance for banks to ensure that they are X‐efficient so as to compete successfully or risk being marginalized. This paper uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess X‐efficiency of banks in Hong Kong and Singapore via a two‐stage (combining both the intermediation and production stages) banking model. Changes in X‐efficiency over time are computed to determine if policy initiatives have facilitated improvements in efficiency. Our results on X‐efficiency of banks demarcated by size and ownership provide valuable insights into the issues of scale economies and the impact of family ownership on X‐efficiency.