Search results
1 – 2 of 2Dennis J. Adsit, Manuel London, Steven Crom and Dana Jones
Describes how relationships were studied between employee attitudes, customer satisfaction, productivity, and administrative effectiveness at two points in time in a…
Abstract
Describes how relationships were studied between employee attitudes, customer satisfaction, productivity, and administrative effectiveness at two points in time in a computer‐hardware customer‐service organization ‐ 281 employees from 92 departments participating at time 1, and 215 employees from 87 departments participating in a follow‐up survey ten months later. Performance and customer satisfaction were associated with employees believing that they have input in evaluating success and have confidence in the management team. Employee attitudes accounted for significant and practically meaningful proportions of variance in performance. The ability of attitudes to predict unit performance and customer satisfaction increased over time. Discusses the results in terms of the value of upward feedback for increasing employee sensitivity to managerial and unit performance and for enhancing managers’ attention to behaviours that influences departmental performance and customer satisfaction.
Details
Keywords
Dennis J. Adsit, Steven Crom, Dana Jones and Manuel London
Examines the relationships between subordinates′ ratings ofboss‐subordinate relationships and supervisors′ overall performanceratings. Data were collected from 3,232 managers (499…
Abstract
Examines the relationships between subordinates′ ratings of boss‐subordinate relationships and supervisors′ overall performance ratings. Data were collected from 3,232 managers (499 work groups) in a large North American information systems firm. Shows that supervisor and subordinate performance ratings were significantly, but not highly‐related. Moderators of this relationship included agreement among subordinates, organizational level, and function. The results have implications for the likely value of upward feedback to managers in different units and the need to educate supervisors in broader aspects of subordinate performance.
Details