James Tapp, Estelle Moore, Mary Stephenson and Davina Cull
This paper aims to describe the process and outcomes of restorative justice (RJ) between a detained patient with autism and a person he harmed.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to describe the process and outcomes of restorative justice (RJ) between a detained patient with autism and a person he harmed.
Design/methodology/approach
A single case study design was used to provide an in-depth description of a RJ referral.
Findings
Restorative outcomes that align with the theories of RJ, in particular trauma processing and emotional reconnection, were observed by RJ practitioners and reported by participants. The person harmed reported a “safer” memory of the offence.
Research limitations/implications
The absence of outcome assessments limits the findings to observational data and self-reported experiences from participants. A triangulated outcome approach is recommended.
Practical implications
RJ practices can safely be applied within a secure hospital environment. The RJ process can also be followed by a person with difficulties in social and emotional processing.
Originality/value
The RJ process provides a safe framework within which forensic mental health services can respond to the needs of victims, which are not routinely addressed in standard clinical practice, and in worst case scenarios, may even be overlooked.