Search results

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the doctrine of ultra vires and its development over time, which is claimed to be one of gradual erosion.

This paper discusses the doctrine of ultra vires and its development overtime, which is claimed to be one of gradual erosion.

It shows how the abolition of the objects clause has signalled the end of ultra vires. Today, it remains nothing more than a ghost, but one which continues to haunt management.

It builds on existing research literature.

The objective of this study is to investigate the existence of a diurnal pattern in the occurrence of adverse clinical management events.

The approach takes the form of a retrospective record review of adverse clinical management events occurring in the 63 facilities of a statutory public health provider in rural south‐eastern Australia. Between January 2006 and December 2007, 2,463 clinical management incidents were reported by clinical staff to a specially designed database.

Adverse clinical management incidents exhibit a marked diurnal pattern. This pattern was evident in both medicine and surgery as well as across facilities of differing acuity. The acrophase or peak of the daily cycle occurs at 14:30 hrs (95%CI 13:25 and 15:34 hrs). Although surgical events peaked earlier in the day (14.02hrs: 95%CI 12:32‐15:32) compared with medicine events (15:26hrs: 95%CI 13:07‐15:32), this difference was not statistically significant.

As the activity rate in the hospital is unknown, this finding study reports the time of the day when most adverse events occur and not their rate as a function of procedural volume.

The existence of a diurnal pattern provides valuable information for strategies aimed at improving patient safety and health care quality. Interventions can now be more accurately targeted.

The paper is the first to move beyond descriptive data of the timing of adverse events and offers a model using chronobiological methods. The demonstration of the existence of diurnal patterns should improve programmes to reduce adverse events.

The following classified, annotated list of titles is intended to provide reference librarians with a current checklist of new reference books, and is designed to supplement the RSR review column, “Recent Reference Books,” by Frances Neel Cheney. “Reference Books in Print” includes all additional books received prior to the inclusion deadline established for this issue. Appearance in this column does not preclude a later review in RSR. Publishers are urged to send a copy of all new reference books directly to RSR as soon as published, for immediate listing in “Reference Books in Print.” Reference books with imprints older than two years will not be included (with the exception of current reprints or older books newly acquired for distribution by another publisher). The column shall also occasionally include library science or other library related publications of other than a reference character.

Four new Training Recommendations which set standards for the training of sales supervisors, sales representatives, goods vehicle drivers, and staff with buying responsibility have been produced by the Distributive Industry Training Board. Together with the recently published Recommendations on specialist sales staff, cashiers and check‐out operators, the Board has now set standards for most of the large occupational categories in the Distributive Industry. The four new Recommendations are Sales Representatives, Sales Supervisors, Selection and Training of Goods Vehicle Drivers, and The Buying Function.

Jean M. Bartunek is the Robert A. and Evelyn J. Ferris chair and professor of organization studies at Boston College as well as a Fellow (since 1999) and a past president (2001–2002) of the Academy of Management. Her Ph.D. in social and organizational psychology is from the University of Illinois at Chicago. Her substantive research interests focus on organizational change, conflict associated with it, and organizational cognition, and her methodological interests center around ways that external researchers can collaborate with insider members of a setting to study the setting. She is an associate editor of the Journal of Applied Behavioral Science and on the editorial boards of multiple other journals. She has published more than 100 journal articles and book chapters and 5 ([co]authored or co-edited) books.

Aim of the present monograph is the economic analysis of the role of MNEs regarding globalisation and digital economy and in parallel there is a reference and examination of some legal aspects concerning MNEs, cyberspace and e‐commerce as the means of expression of the digital economy. The whole effort of the author is focused on the examination of various aspects of MNEs and their impact upon globalisation and vice versa and how and if we are moving towards a global digital economy.

Describes Myriad Genetics and its struggle to develop a genetic testing service while facing challenges from competitors and activist organizations. After Myriad's discovery of the BRCA gene, capable of genetic testing for breast cancer in women, Myriad needed to choose a strategy to provide this service to the public. With several major competitors offering similar services, intense media scrutiny, and a charged activist and political climate, a poor Myriad decision could have major repercussions.

During the 2020 election cycle, 2,276 super PACs spent over $2.1 billion in federal elections. This chapter argues that changes made to the US campaign finance system brought about by the Citizens United v. FEC (2010) and SpeechNow.org v. FEC (2010) cases have destabilized the American political system by fueling tensions between right-wing and left-wing populist factions and by contributing to congressional corruption. By moving away from the political corruption standard and toward the free speech standard in Citizens United, polarizing wealthy mega-donors and dark money sources have come to play a dominant role in congressional elections. These cases also helped to contribute to a two-tiered campaign finance regulatory structure that distinguishes between campaign contributions given directly to federal candidates and political money contributed to super PACs to support or oppose federal candidates. In the 2020 congressional elections, PACs and super PACS outspent both major party candidates combined in 35 House and Senate races. Super PACs are serving as “shadow parties” by targeting competitive races for the purpose of swaying partisan control of Congress. This study also shows that an exceedingly high percentage of super PAC money is spent on negative advertising that further divides rather than unifies the nation. This chapter also highlights the corrupting influence of congressional leadership PACs and examines how super PACs have enabled foreign and dark money sources to illegally influence congressional campaigns.