Search results
1 – 2 of 2Hendrik Ploeger and Daniëlle Groetelaers
This purpose of this paper is to analyses the management difficulties experienced in multi-owned, mixed-use developments and possible solutions, based on the opinions of…
Abstract
Purpose
This purpose of this paper is to analyses the management difficulties experienced in multi-owned, mixed-use developments and possible solutions, based on the opinions of professional management agencies in The Netherlands.
Design/methodology/approach
We performed a survey among professional management agencies that take care of the day-to-day management of many multi-owned, mixed-use developments. The survey focused on aspects such as the influence of the developer on the deed of division and the appointment of the professional manager, and the role of legal advisors.
Findings
The outcomes support the assumption that mixed-use developments have more problems, and problems of a different nature, than homogeneous complexes. We conclude that a custom-made deed of division, or at least one that is appropriate to the mixed-use situation, is preferable. The legal expert involved (a civil law notary) should therefore consult the owners and – if applicable – the professional management agency. They have the practical knowledge to identify management difficulties. Drawing up the deed of division should never be the final piece of the process, but it should be an analogous development to the design and development process. However, our hypothesis that developers should consult the notary during the planning phase of new projects was not confirmed by the survey.
Originality/value
Most legal research focuses on the law and the legality of instruments, sometimes including the practical implications by performing case law research. We stress the importance of including day-to-day practice and practitioners in legal research. Professional management agencies have the requisite knowledge – both practical and legal – of how the system of “apartment ownership” works. This makes them a very useful source of information.
Details
Keywords
Daniëlle A. Groetelaers and Hendrik D. Ploeger
This paper aims to introduce a new view on the role of the lawyer in the process of development and maintenance of the built environment.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to introduce a new view on the role of the lawyer in the process of development and maintenance of the built environment.
Design/methodology/approach
For this paper the research consists of listing and analysing legal questions raised by multiple use of land. A multidisciplinary approach is used from a legal point of view and from a planning development point of view.
Findings
It is argued that law is not only a way of setting boundaries, but also should be stimulating to the development and maintenance of the built environment. This is what we call “juritecture”. The juritect is a designing lawyer; the legal construction is his responsibility. The juritect should have a role in the design process as early as possible, and he should work together with planners and architects. On the one hand, the work of the juritect seems to be that of a legal craftsman. His toolbox consists of instruments of both property law and contract law. On the other hand, the juritect is a legal scholar. By study and discussion of cases and existing law, he opens the doors to further legal development.
Research limitations/implications
This is a first exploratory article on the subject of juritecture. Although it is concluded that this concept will be valid for all legal systems, the article is confined to the continental European Civil legal system and, more specifically, to Dutch law.
Originality/value
This paper introduces the new concept of “juritecture”, which challenges existing views on the role of the lawyer in the built environment.
Details