Search results
1 – 2 of 2Damodar Chari, Ina Sawhney, Elizabeta Mukaetova-Ladinska, Lucy Beishon and Hari Subramaniam
This study aims to establish if risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in older hospitalized psychiatric patients differ from geriatric inpatients and if the current risk…
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to establish if risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in older hospitalized psychiatric patients differ from geriatric inpatients and if the current risk assessment tools being used are suitable.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors undertook a single centre retrospective review of 75 records for presence of predetermined risk factors. In total, 55 discharged patients with thrombotic events within geriatric settings were compared with 20 from mental health settings. Differences in risk factors were determined using t-test and Fisher’s exact test.
Findings
VTE patients in geriatric units were older and had reduced mobility. Psychiatric patients were more likely to be dehydrated and treated with psychotropics. Whilst rates of VTE screening were comparable in both settings, geriatric inpatients were more frequently prescribed thromboprophylaxis.
Research limitations/implications
Older psychiatric inpatients differ from those in medical/surgical settings in their profiles and risk factors for VTE. Approaches for VTE risk management also differed.
Practical implications
The study suggests the need for VTE screening tools and treatment protocols specific to older psychiatric settings.
Social implications
Targeted approaches may improve outcomes specific to each group.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt in comparing VTE risk factors across acute physical health care and mental health settings.
Details
Keywords
V. Veeravel, Pradiptarathi Panda and A. Balakrishnan
The present study aims to verify whether there is a positive (negative) role being played by the institutional investors on the loss-making companies' performance.
Abstract
Purpose
The present study aims to verify whether there is a positive (negative) role being played by the institutional investors on the loss-making companies' performance.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors employ panel data regression and two-step system generalised method of moments (SYS-GMM) to test the above objective.
Findings
The empirical results clearly show that no positive relation is found between institutional investors and loss-making companies' performance.
Research limitations/implications
The findings of the study might have significant implications for firms to improve the firms' operational performance [return on assets (ROA)]. Also, the firm's financial performance [return on equity (ROE)] could be improved by increasing profitability which will reflect in the share prices of the firms whereby the performance can build the investors' confidence over the firm. Market performance (Tobin's Q) could be increased by providing more attractive offers and discounts to customers to capture the business opportunities available in the market.
Practical implications
The overall findings might have for reaching implications in the manufacturing sector with regard to allowing (disallowing) institutional investors.
Social implications
The results of the study may help both companies and institutional investors.
Originality/value
This is the maiden attempt to study whether loss-making companies could be positively (negatively) impacted by the arrival of sophisticated institutional investors [foreign institutional investors (FIIs) and domestic institutional investors (DIIs)]. Further, this study is largely different from previous studies in terms of using new variables which are related to firm characteristics and valuation multiples. Further, seeing if the institutional investors tend to enhance the firm performance is curious.
Details