Nazmi Sae'b Jarrar, Malcolm Smith and Colin Dolley
To examine the likelihood of successfully implementing activity‐based costing (ABC) in a university setting.
Abstract
Purpose
To examine the likelihood of successfully implementing activity‐based costing (ABC) in a university setting.
Design/methodology/approach
A case‐based method is adopted, through the survey of participants in one ABC implementation.
Findings
A positive association was identified between successful implementation and the involvement and support of senior management, though perceptions were found to vary according to the precise role of participants in the implementation process.
Research limitations/implications
The data relate to a single Australian university, so that the findings are not necessarily generalisable elsewhere.
Practical implications
The alignment of the ABC system with the university's competitive strategy, continuous improvement programs and organisational culture, is important to a successful implementation.
Originality/value
The study compares the perceptions of users and preparers to the implementation process and identifies significant differences between the two groups.
Details
Keywords
Theo Christopher, Salleh Hassan and Atique Islam
This paper examines why a sample of Singaporean listed companies voluntarily report Value Added Statements (VASs) in their annual reports. Given prior studies regarding the…
Abstract
This paper examines why a sample of Singaporean listed companies voluntarily report Value Added Statements (VASs) in their annual reports. Given prior studies regarding the factors motivating disclosure of VASs in Australia, this study seeks to compare its findings with those prior studies. The result suggests that the decision to voluntarily report VAS is positively related to firm's interest coverage, size, and industry membership, of which the latter two variables, firm size and industry membership, are also found to be significant in the Australian studies. In addition, while firm's effective taxation burden and leverage are significant predictors in the Australian studies, they are not significant in this study. Explanations are advanced for differences in the results of the studies between the two countries.