Search results

1 – 3 of 3
Per page
102050
Citations:
Loading...
Access Restricted. View access options
Article
Publication date: 16 March 2010

Charles E. Dropkin

The purpose of this paper is to summarize the Joint Report on Regulatory Harmonization issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading…

121

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to summarize the Joint Report on Regulatory Harmonization issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on October 16, 2009.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper explains the background and purpose of the report and lists its recommendations concerning the regulation of markets and financial intermediaries, enforcement, and operations coordination.

Findings

The paper finds that Congress is not currently considering any bills that would combine the SEC and CFTC. SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said the agencies want to “fill regulatory gaps, eliminate inconsistent oversight, and promote greater collaboration.”

Originality/value

The paper summarizes the Joint Report on Regulatory Harmonization issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission on October 16, 2009.

Details

Journal of Investment Compliance, vol. 11 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1528-5812

Keywords

Access Restricted. View access options
Article
Publication date: 23 November 2010

Harry Frischer, Charles E. Dropkin, Jennifer R. Scullion and Richard L. Spinogatti

The purpose of this paper is to explain the June 24, 2010 decision of the US Supreme Court in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd concerning the territorial scope of the…

68

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explain the June 24, 2010 decision of the US Supreme Court in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd concerning the territorial scope of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).

Design/methodology/approach

The paper describes the complaint, the reasoning of the earlier lower court decision, the reasoning of the Supreme Court decision, and the practical effects of the Supreme Court decision.

Findings

Addressing the territorial scope of the Exchange Act for the first time, the Court rejected the widely applied “conduct” and “effects” tests and instead prescribed a new “transactional” test. Finding no affirmative indication that §10(b) of the Act applies extraterritorially; the Court found that its application depends on whether the purchases and sales of securities were made specifically in the USA, and not upon the place where a deception may have originated.

Originality/value

The paper provides expert guidance from financial services lawyers.

Details

Journal of Investment Compliance, vol. 11 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1528-5812

Keywords

Available. Content available
Article
Publication date: 23 November 2010

Henry A. Davis

325

Abstract

Details

Journal of Investment Compliance, vol. 11 no. 4
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1528-5812

1 – 3 of 3
Per page
102050