The purpose of this paper is to investigate the net relationship between internal wage dispersion and firm performance.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the net relationship between internal wage dispersion and firm performance.
Design/methodology/approach
An empirical investigation of the relationship between internal wage dispersion and firm performance is performed using linked employer‐employee data for Norwegian firms from 1986 to 1997.
Findings
Contrary to findings in previous empirical work of a positive relationship between internal wage dispersion and firm performance, the analysis finds no such evidence in Norwegian firms, even though internal wage dispersion has increased.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to the relatively sparse empirical literature on internal wage dispersion and firm performance. Further, the analysis provides a new econometric specification for estimating internal wage dispersion that explicitly takes into account the hierarchical organization of firms. In contrast with previous work, the analysis also distinguishes between dispersion in both the fixed and variable portions of wages.
Details
Keywords
The purpose of this paper is to investigate empirically whether job assignment, based on comparative advantage and learning about workers’ abilities, can explain wage and…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate empirically whether job assignment, based on comparative advantage and learning about workers’ abilities, can explain wage and promotion dynamics within firms.
Design/methodology/approach
The Gibbons and Waldman model is estimated in a generalized method of moments (GMM) framework using a unique data set on white‐collar workers in Norway, for the years 1987‐1997. The estimation is carried out on two occupational groups: technical and administrative white‐collar workers.
Findings
The placing of workers in a given position within a firm's hierarchy is based on comparative advantage. Both measurable and unmeasurable skills are important. This holds in both occupations that were studied in this investigation. When it comes to firms’ learning about their workers, the results are not so clear; however, overall, the results on learning seem to have stronger support than found in previous studies. In general, there is more evidence for learning about administrative white‐collar workers than learning about technical white‐collar workers.
Originality/value
This paper contributes to a very small thread of empirical literature concerning wage and promotion dynamics within firms using linked employer‐employee data that contain detailed information on firm hierarchies.