Beverly A. Wagner and Andrew D.G. Alderdice
Small and medium‐sized companies often struggle to achieve sustainable growth or access wider markets. This insight from industry aims to describe the case of Scot Trout and…
Abstract
Purpose
Small and medium‐sized companies often struggle to achieve sustainable growth or access wider markets. This insight from industry aims to describe the case of Scot Trout and Salmon a company that acts as a distribution hub for a number of small and medium‐sized enterprise (SME) specialist fish producers in the west of Scotland.
Design/methodology/approach
This article provides a qualitative case study method.
Findings
A total of 90 per cent of Scottish companies are SMEs and with a fragile economy it is imperative that these SMEs can grow and flourish. The “loadshare distribution initiative” demonstrates one supply chain strategy by which this could be achieved.
Research limitations/implications
Further research is required to extend understanding of the case through attention to the impact on the SME organisation in the longer term.
Practical implications
The distribution initiative enabled all members of the supply chain to achieve the goal of cost reduction by simply sharing transport.
Originality/value
The case study illustrates a positive example of supply chain co‐operation.
Details
Keywords
Henry L. Petersen and Fred Lemke
– The purpose of this paper is to explore reputational risk that are borne in the supply chain and contribute to this contemporary but growing research stream.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore reputational risk that are borne in the supply chain and contribute to this contemporary but growing research stream.
Design/methodology/approach
First, a theoretical framework is provided to help in the characterisation of reputational risks and how they impact supply chain members that may be multiple tiers away from the manufacturer. Then, semi-structured interviews were conducted with practitioners who were familiar with reputational risks and who were engaging in varying mitigating techniques. Cognitive modelling was utilised to report the findings.
Findings
The practitioners in this paper were very familiar with the risks and were active in varying mitigating practices as budgets and resource constraints would allow. The brevity of the risks identified and the significance of specific risks with how they impact a reputation was revealed. Mitigation is an ongoing and haphazard process with very little information available as would be expected with a typical risk management approach.
Research limitations/implications
This paper serves to provide practitioners insight into the varying methods used by firms with supply chain members that number in hundreds. Based on our findings, a recommendation was made that utilise corporate social responsibility as a foundation that is proposed to address a number of risks including those related to price, availability and quality. The limits of this work are that it is specific to a select group of practitioners specialised in this area. Although the information is rich, it is not generalisable.
Originality/value
This paper makes a significant contribution to the literature by providing insight into the perceptions of practitioners who make decisions on mitigating reputational risks. The results suggest that this is a very new area of management that is striving to find a way to minimise their exposure.