Search results

1 – 2 of 2
Per page
102050
Citations:
Loading...
Access Restricted. View access options
Article
Publication date: 1 October 2005

Andrew Banasiewicz

The paper aims to review and critique the current state of loyalty program planning and analytics, highlighting a number of process and methodological deficiencies.

9653

Abstract

Purpose

The paper aims to review and critique the current state of loyalty program planning and analytics, highlighting a number of process and methodological deficiencies.

Design/methodology/approach

A general loyalty program planning approach is outlined, designed to build a foundation for a profitable loyalty initiative.

Findings

The paper demonstrates the importance of robust customer insights to program planning and its ongoing management; it also challenges the accuracy of the conventional buyer loyalty measurement approach. In particular, the paper highlights the flaws of the dichotomous loyalty classification which makes often unreasonable category purchase requirements assumptions.

Originality/value

The alternative to the loyal customers vs brand switchers buyer categorization is offered, which allows customers to be single‐brand loyal, multi‐brand loyal or brand switchers. An explicit brand buyer loyalty categorization is presented, built around explicit differentiation between repurchase exclusivity and brand loyalty.

Details

Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol. 22 no. 6
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0736-3761

Keywords

Access Restricted. View access options
Article
Publication date: 1 August 2005

Andrew D. Banasiewicz

To explore the appropriateness of statistical significance testing to measure the practical, managerial significance of outcomes in marketing programmes.

1653

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the appropriateness of statistical significance testing to measure the practical, managerial significance of outcomes in marketing programmes.

Design/methodology/approach

An in‐depth analysis of SST's scientific roots is coupled with delineation of a set of general objectives of marketing‐programme measurement to identify the applicability limits of significance testing.

Findings

In particular, it is shown that the relatively well known sample‐size dependence of SST and its somewhat lesser known replicability, representativeness and impact fallacies can severely affect the robustness of significance tests. Statistical significance is not the same concept as practical significance.

Practical implications

Comprehensive discussion of principles and practice leads to a set of prescriptive usage recommendations, directed at the goal of establishing much‐needed applicability rules and limits for the use of significance‐testing methodologies in an applied marketing context.

Originality/value

This robust challenge to the efficacy of significance testing in marketing practice should be of interest to any marketing planner concerned with the collection and use of marketing intelligence.

Details

Marketing Intelligence & Planning, vol. 23 no. 5
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0263-4503

Keywords

1 – 2 of 2
Per page
102050