Search results
1 – 4 of 4Tanuja Agarwala, Amaia Arizkuren, Elsa Del Castillo and Marta Muñiz
To understand whether the three dimensions of work–family culture, namely managerial support, negative consequences and organizational time demands relate in different ways with…
Abstract
Purpose
To understand whether the three dimensions of work–family culture, namely managerial support, negative consequences and organizational time demands relate in different ways with different types of commitment; affective, continuance and normative. The relationships were examined in a three-country cross-national context.
Design/methodology/approach
Questionnaire survey was conducted in India, Peru and Spain among executives and managers drawn from both the manufacturing and the services sectors.
Findings
The three countries were both similar and different with Peru and Spain more similar to each other than with India. Managerial support dimension of work–family culture predicted affective commitment across all the three countries. Differences were found with respect to predictors of normative commitment. Managerial support predicted normative commitment for Spain. Lower negative career consequences resulted in decreased normative commitment among the managers in Peru and Spain.
Research limitations/implications
The study has limitations of generalizability and common method variance.
Practical implications
Human resource managers will find the study useful to determine which dimensions of work–family culture would predict the outcomes desired. The study has implications for the design of human resource practices in the industry.
Originality/value
The study is the first that addresses the three dimensions of work–family culture and organizational commitment in a cross-national context. The study suggests that the way in which work–family culture is conceptualized and experienced by employees may vary even among countries classified as “collectivist.”
Details
Keywords
Naiara Arnaez, Amaia Arizkuren, Marta Muñiz and María Eugenia Sánchez
The purpose of this paper is to analyze repatriation as an active actor on his/her return and not just as a passive receiver of organizational human resource management practices…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to analyze repatriation as an active actor on his/her return and not just as a passive receiver of organizational human resource management practices. Traditionally, literature has been focused on investigating the impact of organizational practices and support on repatriation, but new studies suggest that this approach is insufficient. According to these studies, individual and contextual influences are also important on repatriation and new studies are needed to measure its impact.
Design/methodology/approach
This article is the base of future studies to analyze the impact of both approaches at once.
Findings
The paper departs from recent literature in the field, to develop a series of research propositions.
Research limitations/implications
The implications of this study include to contribute to the knowledge and future research on the expatriation process, studying the adaptation, performance, etc. of the expatriate during the international mission and particularly the last part of the process, repatriation, which has not received so much attention.
Practical implications
This paper highlights that mismanagement of repatriation could lead to turnover of these valuable professionals or to a non-satisfactory reinstatement or even to inefficiency. On the other hand, the perception that repatriation is not well managed and that it does not lead to an advance for the employee could discourage future expatriates to accept international missions, which could even slow down the international progress of the company.
Originality/value
The integration of the traditional and the emerging perspectives of repatriation process.
Details