Search results

In this paper, it is argued that previous estimates of the expected cost of equity and the expected arithmetic risk premium in the UK show a degree of upward bias. Given the importance of the risk premium in regulatory cost of capital in the UK, this has important policy implications. There are three reasons why previous estimates could be upward biased. The first two arise from the comparison of estimates of the realised returns on government bond (‘gilt’) with those of the realised and expected returns on equities. These estimates are frequently used to infer a risk premium relative to either the current yield on index‐linked gilts or an ‘adjusted’ current yield measure. This is incorrect on two counts; first, inconsistent estimates of the risk‐free rate are implied on the right hand side of the capital asset pricing model; second, they compare the realised returns from a bond that carried inflation risk with the realised and expected returns from equities that may be expected to have at least some protection from inflation risk. The third, and most important, source of bias arises from uplifts to expected returns. If markets exhibit ‘excess volatility’, or f part of the historical return arises because of revisions to expected future cash flows, then estimates of variance derived from the historical returns or the price growth must be used with great care when uplifting average expected returns to derive simple discount rates. Adjusting expected returns for the effect of such biases leads to lower expected cost of equity and risk premia than those that are typically quoted.

This paper investigates the Jensen's free cash flow (FCF) hypothesis in the context of UK cash acquisitions. Under this hypothesis, financial slack induces mangers to acquire targets for cash if such behaviour generates either pecuniary or non‐pecuniary rewards for them, giving rise to a potential agency problem around cash takeovers. We argue that the stronger position of shareholders, as opposed to firm managers, in the UK should help in constraining such potential agency problems around such mergers. Compared to the USA, position, this should make the FCF hypothesis less relevant in the UK.

This paper uses short‐run announcement period returns and long‐run calendar‐time returns in testing our hypotheses.

This paper shows that low leverage and high FCF may be advantageous provided shareholder monitoring is adequate. By analysing both announcement period and long‐term returns, we show that acquirers with high levels of FCF are superior performers, and that any long‐run under‐performance of cash acquirers appears to be associated with low cash resources and low institutional ownership.

Inevitably, long‐run returns measurement is contentious, although we present results from alternative models to mitigate this. Limitations are necessarily imposed by the sample size, meaning that multi‐way partitioning of the data is not feasible.

The practical implications are that the UK regulatory and institutional ownership regime may actually protect the interests of shareholders and mitigate agency problems.

As far as we are aware, this is the first paper to systematically test FCF, leverage and institutional ownership effects in the context of UK cash acquisitions.

This article reviews the way in which the law in England and Wales considers the valuation of companies, and argues that the issues arising from this legal perspective are indicative of a gap between the economic theory and practice of company valuation. Furthermore, an analysis of the relevant case law reveals several interesting practical difficulties which may suggest a role for theoretical analysis. Equally, a lack of awareness of the economic theory of valuation is revealed on the part of the courts. It is argued that this lack of awareness may have implications for the practices of valuation by professional accounting firms that are currently observed in the UK. An examination of the theory of company valuation shows that there is widespread agreement on the basic principle of the approach to be followed in valuing the shares in a company; in short, it is the present value of the company's future cash flows. Although there is debate over issues such as the appropriate model to be used in pricing risk, and how to allow for the impact of taxation in arriving at the discount rate, this principle appears to be universally accepted. Although some investigations have been carried out into the practical context of company valuation in the UK (Arnold and Moizer 1984, Moizer and Arnold 1984, Day 1986, and Keane 1992), no attention has been paid in the economics and accounting literature to the legal context. This is perhaps surprising given that the courts are sometimes important users of company valuation reports. This article reviews the way in which the law in England and Wales considers the valuation of companies, and argues that the issues arising from this legal perspective are indicative of a gap between the economic theory and practice of company valuation. Furthermore, an analysis of the relevant case law reveals several interesting practical difficulties which may suggest a role for theoretical analysis. Equally, a lack of awareness of the economic theory of valuation is revealed on the part of the courts. Historically, one of the features of the English commercial courts has been their refusal to become involved in matters of commercial judgement. English judges have held themselves to be sophisticated technicians in law but self‐professed amateurs in commercial matters. Their role has been to hear expert witnesses and to weigh up their professional advice. This contrasts with the position in continental courts; for example in France, the judges sitting at first instance in the lower commercial courts are businessmen and women rather than lawyers, with the result that their approach and findings are likely to be less legalistic and more commercial. This English legal approach needs to be seen in the context of an increasing concern with valuation attributable to the changes brought about by Sections 459 to 461 of the Companies Act 1985, together with the recent case law. Section 459 of the Act is concerned with minority unfair prejudice actions and under that section a member may petition the court for an order on the grounds that the petitioner's interests have been, are being or will be unfairly prejudiced by the conduct of the company's affairs. A considerable body of case law has built up on what constitutes unfairly prejudicial conduct. Under section 461 the court may make such order as it thinks fit for giving relief including the purchase of the shares of any member of the company by other members or by the company itself. Here the crucial question for the courts and for the parties negotiating a buy‐out in the shadow of the courts is the amount of the valuation and the factor to be taken into account in reaching that valuation. In such circumstances, it might be expected that there would be considerable concern with the basis of the valuation. However, ‘basis’ can have several different meanings; in the first place, it could be defined as asset basis, in the sense that a valuation may be concerned with the replacement, ‘going concern’ or realisable value of the firm's assets. Second, there is a need to define what economic model has been used to derive the ‘going concern’ or economic value; it may be helpful to describe this as the economic model basis of the valuation. Third, there is the question as to whether the proportion of the equity held affects the value; this might be termed the control basis. As we show below, the concern of the theoretical literature is primarily with the second category, whereas the case law tends to concern itself with the first and third categories. In order to clarify the theoretical and practical considerations involved, the first section of this paper briefly reviews the theory of equity valuation and the second contrasts this with the rather limited evidence on UK valuation practice. In the third section, the legal issues involved are explained and the way in which the courts proceed in cases which involve the valuation of shares are reviewed. Although the courts rely on expert evidence in making a valuation, certain principles and guidelines for valuation are laid down by the courts, and these are analysed and contrasted with the prescriptions on valuation found in the finance literature.

Melbourne High School embodies the belief that the state has the right to offer secondary education, a view challenged by private interests when the school that became Melbourne High School was first proposed. It also affirms the conviction that state secondary schools play a crucial part in the opening of educational opportunities to all students. 2005 was the year of Melbourne High School’s centenary and this paper uses that occasion to reflect on the social optimism and determination of those who fought to establish the school and on the narrowness and arrogance of the market view of education that motivated many of those who opposed the state’s entry into secondary education. It also reflects on the appeals to the free market that many politicians, educational administrators and school principals today use to protect social and economic privilege

Explores the use which is made of strategic management accounting in the hotel sector through case studies at six major UK hotel groups. Uses the definition of strategic management accounting – “the provision and analysis of management accounting data relating to business strategy: particularly the relative levels and trends in real costs and prices, volumes, market share, cash flow and the demands on a firm′s total resources”. The results demonstrate that the accounting function in hotel groups is becoming increasingly involved in strategic management accounting, both in planning and in ad hoc exercises on the market conditions and competitor analysis. The widespread adoption of strategic management accounting is consistent with the open and relatively homogeneous nature of the industry and the high degree of competitiveness among the hotel groups in the market.

Retailing thought and practice is premised on the assumption that consumers visit retailers to search for and acquire objects produced by manufacturers. In essence, we assume that the acts of consuming and producing are conducted by separate entities. This unspoken yet familiar premise shapes the questions retail scholars ask and the way retail practitioners think about their industry. Although this assumption accurately depicted retailing since the Industrial Revolution, its relevance is being challenged by a growing set of individuals who are equipped with new digital tools to engage in self-manufacturing. In this chapter, we examine self-manufacturing with a particular focus on the recent rise of desktop 3D printing. After discussing this new technology and reviewing the literature, we offer a conceptual classification of four distinct types of 3D printed objects and use this classification to inform a content analysis of over 400 of these objects. Based on this review and analysis, we discuss the implications of self-manufacturing for retailing thought and practice.