João Viseu, Joana Santos, Carla Santarém Semedo, Arnold B. Bakker, Maria Tims, Sara Agrela and Beatriz Lagareiro
This study aims to adapt and validate the Job Crafting Scale (JCS), a measure based on the conceptualization of job crafting of the job demands–resources theory, for a sample of…
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to adapt and validate the Job Crafting Scale (JCS), a measure based on the conceptualization of job crafting of the job demands–resources theory, for a sample of Portuguese workers and to test its psychometric properties regarding validity (factor, convergent, discriminant, and criterion) and reliability.
Design/methodology/approach
Two subsamples (n1 = 315 and n2 = 329) of Portuguese workers aged 18 years old and over participated in this research. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess the factor structure.
Findings
The results indicated that the Portuguese version of the JCS, with 18 items, has a factor structure composed of four-correlated factors. Furthermore, the results demonstrated the existence of factor, discriminant, and criterion validity, as well as reliability.
Originality/value
This study provides a job crafting measure adapted to the Portuguese language that can serve as a diagnostic tool for workers and organizations.
Propósito
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo adaptar y validar la Job Crafting Scale (JCS), una medida basada en la conceptualización de job crafting de la Teoría de Demandas-Recursos, para una muestra de trabajadores portugueses y probar sus propiedades psicométricas en cuanto a validez (factor, convergente, discriminante y de criterio) y confiabilidad.
Diseño/metodología/enfoque
En esta investigación participaron dos submuestras (n1 = 315 y n2 = 329) de trabajadores portugueses de 18 años o más. Se utilizó un análisis factorial exploratorio y un análisis factorial confirmatorio para evaluar la estructura factorial.
Resultados
Los resultados indicaron que la versión portuguesa del JCS, con 18 ítems, tiene una estructura factorial compuesta por cuatro factores correlacionados. Además, los resultados demostraron la existencia de validez factorial, discriminante y de criterio, así como confiabilidad.
Originalidad
Este estudio proporciona una medida de job crafting adaptada a la lengua portuguesa que puede servir como herramienta de diagnóstico para trabajadores y organizaciones.
Objetivo
Este estudo teve como objetivo adaptar e validar a Job Crafting Scale (JCS), uma medida baseada na conceptualização de job crafting da Teoria das Exigências-Recursos, numa amostra de trabalhadores portugueses e testar as suas propriedades psicométricas quanto à validade (fatorial, convergente, discriminante e de critério) e fiabilidade.
Desenho/metodologia/abordagem
Duas subamostras (n1 = 315 e n2 = 329) compostas por trabalhadores portugueses com 18 ou mais anos foram recolhidas. Foram utilizadas uma análise fatorial exploratória e uma análise fatorial confirmatória para analisar a estrutura fatorial.
Resultados
Os resultados obtidos indicaram que a versão portuguesa da JCS, composta por 18 itens, possui uma estrutura fatorial composta por quatro fatores correlacionados. Além disso, os resultados demonstraram a existência de validade fatorial, discriminante e de critério, bem como de fiabilidade.
Originalidade/valor
Este estudo fornece uma medida de job crafting adaptada para a língua portuguesa que pode servir como ferramenta de diagnóstico para trabalhadores e organizações.
Details
Keywords
- Job crafting
- Validity
- Proactivity
- Reliability
- Employees
- Job crafting
- Validez
- Proactividad
- Confiabilidad
- Trabajadores
- Palavras-chave: Job crafting
- Validade
- Proatividade
- Fiabilidade
- Trabalhadores
- Job crafting
- Validade
- Proatividade
- Fiabilidade
- Trabajadores
- Palavras-chave: Job crafting
- Validade
- Proatividade
- Fiabilidade
- Trabalhadores
Guilherme Brittes Benitez, Diego Biondo, João Felipe Capioto Seelent and Dalton Alexandre Kai
This study aims to investigate the role of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies (base and front-end) on the deployment of Lean bundles (just-in-time, total productive maintenance and…
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the role of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies (base and front-end) on the deployment of Lean bundles (just-in-time, total productive maintenance and total quality management) to achieve operational performance.
Design/methodology/approach
We adopt a stakeholder perspective by considering the role of leaders, employees and customers when engaged in quality improvement. The objective is to compare moderation and mediation models and address a gap in literature related to the contrasting outcomes from I4.0 technologies and Lean deployment on firm performance. We perform survey research involving 270 manufacturing firms. We use factor analysis, hierarchical ordinary least squares regression and bootstrapping techniques to evaluate the hypothesised relationships.
Findings
Our findings confirm I4.0’s mediating influence, suggesting that organisations focusing on stakeholders’ engagement in quality more effectively develop Lean bundles and achieve operational performance. Regarding moderation models, we find no significant relationship between base technologies (Internet of Things, big data, cloud computing and artificial intelligence) and contrasting results from front-end technologies (robotics, simulation, augmented and/or virtual reality and 3D printing) on deployment of Lean bundles.
Originality/value
Our work theoretically contributes to the current operations management field by showing that organisations should first engage stakeholders for quality improvement instead of trying to engage stakeholders and adopt digital technologies simultaneously to deploy Lean bundles.
Details
Keywords
Fabricia S. Rosa, Rogério João Lunkes, Mauricio Codesso, Alcindo Cipriano Argolo Mendes and Gabriel Donadio Costa
The purpose of this article is to analysis of the effects of green innovation ecosystem coopetition (cooperation and competition), environmental management practices (EMPs) and…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this article is to analysis of the effects of green innovation ecosystem coopetition (cooperation and competition), environmental management practices (EMPs) and digital innovation (DI) on carbon footprint reduction.
Design/methodology/approach
To conduct the study, a questionnaire was administered to hotel managers from different regions of Brazil. Data were collected from 197 hotels and analyzed via partial least squares structural equation modeling.
Findings
The results show that green innovation ecosystem cooperation positively and significantly affects EMPs and DI. Green innovation ecosystem competition interactions also benefit the adoption of EMPs. However, they do not significantly influence the use of DI. The results indicate that hotels that are in a scenario of simultaneous competition and collaboration (coopetition) within the green innovation ecosystem can reduce carbon emissions when EMPs and DI are used.
Research limitations/implications
The authors contribute to the literature by showing different pathways for reducing the carbon footprint of hotels. The results expand the authors’ knowledge by showing evidence that cooperation and competition interactions can produce distinct effects, especially on DI. Thus, this study has important practical implications for hotel managers seeking to improve their environmental practices and DI with the help of external multiagent resources and knowledge.
Originality/value
This research contributes to the literature by examining how cooperation and competition interactions in the green innovation ecosystem help in the adoption of environmental management and DI practices.