Search results

Industry 4.0 is based on cyber-physical systems (CPSs); therefore, the risks of cyberattacks tend to increase. A cyberattack is any malicious act that could jeopardize the security of production, accounting and financial systems. This review hypothesizes quality management is in a position to play an important role in preventing and detecting hacker attacks.

To verify this hypothesis, Lakato’s research program was utilized in a bibliometric review. This review was separated into two stages: the first was a descriptive analysis and the second was a scientific mapping, done using a technique known as text mining. This technique was guided by factorial and cluster analysis.

The analysis revealed that this subject is emerging and relevant. It was observed that understanding the vulnerabilities of connected systems is crucial for combating cyberattacks. Furthermore, the study highlighted the potential of multivariate control charts, such as Hotelling’s T-squared charts and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) control charts, in efficiently detecting anomalies in connected systems.

This article introduces an approach integrating quality management, statistical analysis and cybersecurity to safeguard CPSs. By leveraging advanced statistical techniques, such as Hotelling T² charts and EWMA charts, in conjunction with the foundational principles of quality management systems (QMS), such as continuous improvement and process standardization, this could be a potentially robust defense against cyberattacks. The integration of these tools allows for the early detection of anomalies and potential cyber threats, ensuring the prevention of integrity and security of interconnected industrial processes.

Social protection states the public-mandated (strategies and programmes) to address the vulnerability and risk among poor and near-poor households. Social protection must not only help people meet their basic needs but also contribute to the long-term well-being and broader societal goals of equity, social justice and empowerment. The role of social protection in achieving these goals has not been adequately documented. This paper examines the performance of the social protection mechanism from the perspective of the regional structural and institutional performance indicators. Social protection outlay dynamics are synthesized in the structural and institutional conducts.

A world regional comparability is made by considering the panel dataset for the time interval 1995–2020. In empirics, the unconditional and conditional ranks are constructed, and regression analyses are made subject to (1) the fiscal constraint of social protection, (2) structural performance indicators and (3) the institutional performance indicators of the targeted regions across the globe. The fully modified-ordinary least square (FM-OLS) method is used to construct the ranks.

The rank analysis demonstrates that the developed regions (i.e. Europe, Central Asia and North America) have relatively good welfare standards and fiscal capacity for social protection drives compared to the developing/underdeveloped regions (i.e. Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia). The structural/institutional performance indicators have shown their significance in determining/utilizing their budget for social protection and maintaining welfare standards. Interestingly, most developed regions are relatively reluctant to maintain the structural/institutional performance for the determination/execution of the funds for social protection as compared to the developing and underdeveloped regions.

In policy discourse, this research suggests that governments must make some market operations to enhance their regions’ structural and institutional performance to get better outcomes of social protection spending in the form of attractive welfare standards.

Multiple studies have been done considering the social protection dynamics at nano, micro and macro levels, while this study considered the mega dataset across the globe to analyse the social protection dynamics in consideration of structural and institutional performances.