Search results

The purpose of this paper is to design and apply a critical framework for assessing the inclusivity of gender diversity training. The framework combines insights from intersectional feminist and postcolonial feminist theory. It is applied to assess whether and how influential gender diversity training manuals question the (re)production of systems of inequality and promote the recognition of varied lived experiences of women particularly in global workplaces.

This qualitative research was done in two stages. First, we designed a critical framework consisting of five elements taking inspiration from intersectional and postcolonial feminist theories. Second, we analysed four gender diversity training manuals from prominent international organizations to assess their inclusivity.

We found that gender diversity training manuals construct a binary understanding of gender, implying that being a woman is a universal experience. Second, the documents take a systemic approach to intersectionality, acknowledging societal systems, but the focus is on oppression as opposed to privilege, obscuring possible complexities of intersecting social categories. Third, the narratives of gender diversity trainings reflect western hegemony in referring to “global norms” and women from the global south.

The paper brings together complex theoretical strands of intersectional and postcolonial feminist theory in the form of a critical framework that can not only be used to assess gender diversity training but also be applied to other gender diversity interventions. Practical suggestions for trainers to develop more inclusive gender diversity trainings are discussed.

Smart farming (SF) holds immense potential in making farming viable and improving farmers' livelihoods. However, its adoption is still in the early stages, and the resulting impacts are underexplored. This study investigates the information systems/policy and implementation barriers to the adoption of SF and its implications for various socioeconomic aspects.

This survey research used a structured questionnaire to collect data on farm details, farmer characteristics and usage of SF technologies from a sample of 197 farmers based in the State of Karnataka, India. Exploratory factor analysis with principal component extraction is used to validate the proposed questionnaire constructs. Results are analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVAs and interaction plots.

Our study throws light on the benefits and barriers of SF technologies. Advanced SF technologies displayed a significant positive effect on socioeconomic variables compared to startup SF technologies, which displayed no significant effect. Overcoming information systems/policy barriers for adopting startup and advanced SF technologies displayed significant positive effects on farmers' health and net income, whereas overcoming implementation barriers for adopting advanced SF technologies led to improvement in the farmers' gross income.

Although the technical feasibility of SF has been explored in the literature, its adoption barriers and socioeconomic impacts have been underexplored. To the best of our knowledge, the interaction between different types of barriers and the level of SF adoption has not yet been investigated in the literature. Our study addresses those research gaps using data from a previously underexplored context, viz. developing nations.

This study aims to elucidate the dynamics of social media discourse during global health events, specifically investigating how users across different platforms perceive, react to and engage with information concerning such crises.

A mixed-method approach was employed, combining both quantitative and qualitative data collection. Initially, thematic analysis was applied to a data set of social media posts across four major platforms over a 12-month period. This was followed by sentiment analysis to discern the predominant emotions embedded within these communications. Statistical tools were used to validate findings, ensuring robustness in the results.

The results showcased discernible thematic and emotional disparities across platforms. While some platforms leaned toward factual information dissemination, others were rife with user sentiments, anecdotes and personal experiences. Overall, a global sense of concern was evident, but the ways in which this concern manifested varied significantly between platforms.

The primary limitation is the potential non-representativeness of the sample, as only four major social media platforms were considered. Future studies might expand the scope to include emerging platforms or non-English language platforms. Additionally, the rapidly evolving nature of social media discourse implies that findings might be time-bound, necessitating periodic follow-up studies.

Understanding the nature of discourse on various platforms can guide health organizations, policymakers and communicators in tailoring their messages. Recognizing where factual information is required, versus where sentiment and personal stories resonate, can enhance the efficacy of public health communication strategies.

The study underscores the societal reliance on social media for information during crises. Recognizing the different ways in which communities engage with, and are influenced by, platform-specific discourse can help in fostering a more informed and empathetic society, better equipped to handle global challenges.

This research is among the first to offer a comprehensive, cross-platform analysis of social media discourse during a global health event. By comparing user engagement across platforms, it provides unique insights into the multifaceted nature of public sentiment and information dissemination during crises.