Search results

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of state capital participation (SCP) on the corporate environmental engagement (CEE) of privately controlled listed firms in China.

We use a sample of 20,133 firm-year observations from 2009 to 2021. We use three different measures to proxy corporate environmental engagement and two different measures to proxy for state capital participation. We employ a difference-in-difference regression model to estimate the effect of state capital participation on corporate environmental engagement.

Using a sample of 20,133 firm-year observations from 2009 to 2021, we find that SCP significantly increases corporate expenditure on environmental protection, corporate environmental performance and ESG ratings. Specifically, SCP increases environmental investment capacity and attracts more media coverage, online attention and analysts’ following, which leads to better environmental engagement. Further analyses show that after state shareholders exit privately controlled firms, CEE deteriorates, while private capital injection in state-owned firms has no significant impact on CEE. The positive effect of SCP is stronger in privately controlled firms with local government ownership, a larger number of state shareholders, longer state shareholder holding periods, those without politically connected managers and firms operating in heavy pollution industries. Lastly, we show that minority government ownership reduces firm-level toxic emissions and enhances financial performance.

We enrich the literature on the role of minority state ownership in corporate financial and environmental performance.

We enrich the literature on the role of minority state ownership in corporate financial and environmental performance. In light of the escalating environmental concerns and the growing emphasis on corporate environmental responsibility, this study highlights the beneficial role of minority government ownership in driving environmental performance. By providing resources and attracting external scrutiny, the government, as a minority shareholder, can significantly enhance the environmental engagement of privately controlled firms.

This study examines the earnings quality of private-subsidiary firms using a large sample data from India.

The impact of parent–subsidiary relationship on earnings quality is examined using two common proxies. Findings are robust to alternative research designs, including different earnings quality proxies, endogeneity and matching techniques.

The study finds that private firms that are subsidiaries of listed firms tend to have lesser (greater) earnings quality (manipulation). Further, the study reports that this relationship is more pronounced when the parent firm is relatively larger than the subsidiaries. The study finds no evidence that Big 4 affiliation of the parent company improves earnings quality among private subsidiaries; instead, it exacerbates earnings manipulation in some cases. Finally, the authors document that subsidiary firms use tax management, as proxied by book tax differences, to engage in income-increasing earnings manipulation.

This study examines how affiliation with a listed entity as a subsidiary impacts the earnings quality of private companies. Future research could investigate the financial reporting practices of both private subsidiary firms and standalone private firms, comparing them in similar or differing regulatory environments across various countries.

The findings of this study will help investors, bankers, creditors and regulators to understand the financial reporting of private firms. The study calls for enhanced audit quality at the subsidiary level by making the auditor of the parent firm responsible for auditing a subsidiary, a practice that is currently absent in India.

The results contribute to the existing debate on how firms manage earnings using data of private firms in a large emerging market setting. Previous research has not paid enough attention to the earnings quality of private subsidiaries. The study also emphasizes the necessity for a more robust system of governance and supervision for private firms, particularly in India and generally in other countries.

Market share gain is one of the key objectives for all firms for seeking growth. It is also a fundamental aspect of competitive rivalry. The extant review of the literature points to a gap among market share performances of emerging market multinationals (EMNEs) firms, advanced economy multinationals (AMNEs) and local firms. The purpose of this study is to delineate and contrast the market share performance of EMNEs, AMNEs and local firms in Africa.

The study used available longitudinal data (2013–2022) of six industries across four African countries from Euromonitor Passport, a rich, proprietary database.

Applying contingency theory, the study shows that, over time, there is no clear-cut winner in all markets and industries. Rather, market share gain is contingent on country and industry settings in Africa. Empirical analysis demonstrates that high-tech EMNE firms operating in Africa will exceed those of high-tech AMNEs and local firms. The findings also show that local firms generally performed better during the pandemic.

As Africa is a region of interest for scholars and practitioners, critical international business (IB) research contributions in Africa have predominantly focused on foreign investments from a particular nation. The present study enriches the literature by comparing the market share performance of AMNEs, EMNEs and local firms in this important region – during and prepandemic. The study offers theoretical and managerial implications for understanding the long-term performance of these three types of firms.