Search results

The study investigates the predisposition of generational cohorts toward entrepreneurship in an emerging economy as entrepreneurship has arguably become a panacea for unemployment and sustainable economic development.

The study adopts descriptive and cross-sectional survey designs. The study also employs quantitative approach to collect the data from 1,000 workers in 20 selected private and public organizations in Ghana. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation and hierarchical regression techniques.

The results reveal that baby boomers and Generation Z (Gen Z) have a higher predisposition toward entrepreneurship, while Generation X (Gen X) and Generation Y (Gen Y) have a lower predisposition toward entrepreneurship. However, the study found that baby boomers are more predisposed to entrepreneurship than all the generational cohorts. Furthermore, a generation may become entrepreneurs regardless of their gender. Finally, individuals with higher educational qualification (i.e. masters and doctorate) are more likely to become entrepreneurs in a given generation.

The findings imply that entrepreneurial opportunities (such as ease of doing business, favorable business regulations, access to credit facilities, low interest rate, ease of registering business, start-up capital, etc.) should be created by government and its stakeholders to serve as stimuli for members of these generations (particularly baby boomers and Gen Z) to participate fully in entrepreneurial activities. In addition, the culture of “go to college and graduate with the expectation of government employment” and “job for life” should be discouraged to allow members of Gen X and Gen Y build up entrepreneurial mindsets.

This study contributes to generational cohorts and entrepreneurship literature by providing a perspective from the cultural and socio-economic background of an emerging economy. Additionally, this study demonstrates that irrespective of gender, one may become an entrepreneur and highly educated individuals tend be entrepreneurs.

The role of common institutional ownership is becoming increasingly significant in China’s capital market. However, it remains unclear whether common institutional ownership plays a synergistic or collusive role in China’s capital market. Therefore, the study examines the impact of common institutional ownership on the cost of equity capital within the specific context of China.

This study uses a sample of Chinese listed firms over the period 2007–2021. It mainly employs ordinary least squares regression to examine the relationship between common ownership and the cost of equity.

Common institutional ownership has a beneficial, synergistic and monitoring role in reducing a firm’s cost of equity capital in the Chinese emerging market. Lowering business risks, reducing information risk and mitigating agency conflicts play a significant role in mediating the relationship between common institutional ownership and the cost of equity capital. The inhibitory effect of common institutional ownership on the cost of equity is more pronounced for non-SOEs, firms without government support and firms with lower investor attention. The study sheds a positive insight into the ongoing debate regarding the actual effect role of common ownership.

This study offers valuable insights into the ongoing debate regarding the practical implications of common institutional ownership, while also enriching the research on the factors that influence the cost of equity capital for firms. The conclusions hold significant practical implications for companies, investors and regulators.