Search results

This paper aims to explore the relevance of theoretical developments from critical disability studies to information practices scholarship, particularly that which is attuned to how systems of power and inequality create barriers to information. More specifically, this paper aims to interrogate the solutionist ethos that underlies the narrow focus on information access within research concerning information practices and marginalization.

The paper follows a critical interpretation synthesis (CIS) review format, which aligns with the overarching interpretivist research objectives. The CIS review method opens up modes of interdisciplinary analysis that question dominant narratives and assumptions within the literature. In the paper, several concepts from critical disability studies are discussed due to their relevance to key concerns of information practices research. These include the political/relational model of disability, bodymind and crip politics. The theoretical framework of political/relational information access outlined in this paper connects and draws comparisons between the above concepts.

The paper develops the political/relational model of information access, which interrogates dominant narratives that situate information as a resolve for marginalization. Extending insights from critical disability studies and activism, the framework underscores how access to information and information more broadly are sites of collective contestation that are constantly in flux. Political/relational information access situates information and access as political and relational entities through which to collectively refuse the hierarchies of value and normalizing logics attached to them.

The connections between critical disability studies and information practices research have been previously underexplored. The literature review develops the political/relational model of information access, which extends insights from critical disability studies to the growing areas of critical inquiry within information practices scholarship and library and information science research more broadly.

This chapter restates the key points of our argument and considers some of the implications of our findings and analysis with reference to notions of ‘transition’ and ‘political imprisonment’. At the same time, this chapter broadens the analytic frame. In the light of the foregoing interview-based accounts, we elaborate upon the relationship between prison and politics as revealed at the interface between prison and society and prison and history. And we return to the present moment of revolutionary struggle and examine the specific ways the contemporary criminal justice system and the prison have been weaponised by the State Administrative Council with nefarious effects. Our final plea is for further research on the dynamics and effects of penal practice in Southeast Asia and for increased recognition of the ongoing injustices facing the people of Myanmar within the confines of a carceral state.

This article explores the main elements of co-participation in health, examining how community engagement can improve health outcomes and health services’ overall efficiency. It aims to discuss and identify key features that facilitate co-participation strategies in service delivery and health program implementation.

The authors conducted a general literature review to comprehensively explore the role of co-participation in health, drawing on scientific literature and real-world examples to identify key factors that contribute to successful health interventions. A total of 50 published resources were included, and a descriptive analysis was performed, focusing on summarizing existing literature and highlighting key themes and practical strategies. Documents were selected from publications dated between 2004 and 2024.

Community participation is presented as a critical factor in improving population health outcomes. The examined initiatives promote the idea that community integration into the design and implementation of health programs increases treatment adherence, users' health perception and improved health outcomes. Several strategies and approaches are presented as key tools to adequately integrate community engagement such as community empowerment, government decentralization and incorporation of technology, among others.

Coparticipation in health improves health outcomes and promotes greater equity and social justice. Involving citizens in health decision-making contributes to improving the quality of life and well-being of the community. Empowering patients’ decision-making not only builds one’s self-agency in health decision-making but also simultaneously facilitates closing the gaps in healthcare service delivery due to large shortages in the health workforce around the world. This has further implications for overall health systems’ financing, efficiency and sustainability.

This research has social implications as it underscores how community participation is essential for fostering equity, justice and inclusivity within health systems.

This article offers an innovative perspective on the role of partnership in achieving good health outcomes, highlighting the importance of adapting interventions to local contexts, the need for sustainable financing and the inclusion of a wide range of actions toward participation.

Women often face multiple challenges when they are involved in the business. Their situation is even more complex in the family business setting, where multiple family and non-family stakeholders may challenge their legitimacy as a business leader. However, while some women remain invisible, others are able to become legitimate leaders in the family business. This study explores the circumstances that enable women to become legitimate and successful leaders in family businesses embedded in patriarchal contexts.

Considering that our research question is aimed at exploring the determinants of legitimacy of women in the family business, we employed a qualitative research approach using multiple case studies. Data were collected through interviews, secondary sources (internal documents and websites), conversations and observations. Semi-structured interviews were conducted separately with three or four respondents from each firm.

This study finds that women can have a legitimate “professional” role when they are involved in the business early, when they have outside work experience, when they are provided with equal opportunities for learning and development compared to their male siblings and when they are provided with adequate mentoring opportunities from women role models.

This study makes several contributions to the study of gender dynamics in family businesses by unpacking the determinants of women’s legitimacy as leaders in family businesses. This paper also expands on the typologies that Curimbaba (2002) provides, while the typology identifies the different roles that women can play in a family business (i.e. invisible, anchors or professionals), it does not clearly delineate why some women are considered legitimate professional leaders, while others are treated as invisible or anchors. Additionally, this study offers novel insights coming from a patriarchal non-developed context, Colombia.

Networked learning facilitates collaboration and learning interactions. This study aims to explore networked learning in the workplace (knowledge sharing and connection building) and gain insights into the contextual factors (learner and environmental) of learning interactions.

Thematic analysis was conducted to explore how learning interactions were facilitated among healthcare workers in a large hospital in Singapore. This study examined both the learner and environmental factors of learning interactions. Interview and focus group discussions qualitative data were included in the analysis.

The findings of this study reveal that more emphasis can be placed on the environmental factors, and targeting these factors would provide a good foundation for networked learning in the workplace, whereas learner factors could be promoted to enhance additional learning interactions. This study also found that workers learn most frequently from experienced seniors, indicating the value of mentorship programmes in fostering high-quality learning interactions.

This paper sheds light on the comprehensive set of factors that encourage networked learning among healthcare professionals and provides empirical findings that might direct future studies in similar domains.

This paper explores the ways women entrepreneurs in male-dominated industries do identity work in order to gain legitimacy. In particular, we consider such identity work as a process being prompted by their direct environment, while demonstrating the gendered structural power relations in these women’s entrepreneurial contexts. We use a postfeminist lens to show how, in their quest for more legitimacy, they seem to be interpellated by postfeminist discourse.

We have used a narrative approach to show how women entrepreneurs in masculinised contexts do identity work to acquire legitimacy, and moreover use a postfeminist perspective to reflect on this identity work as to demonstrate how these Dutch businesswomen consider their agency in specific feminist terms within these men-dominated industry environments.

We present empirical data of ten women entrepreneurs in the Netherlands and how they discursively and subjectively make sense of their surrounding gendered contexts, in order to illustrate how local gender regimes and individual actions may conspire to constrain as well as stimulate these women’s entrepreneurship. By reflecting on three different ways of identity work through a postfeminist lens, we show how these women are interpellated by postfeminist discourses when trying to gain legitimacy.

The rather small sample does not allow us to generalise our findings to the whole population of women entrepreneurs in men-dominated contexts, yet this was not our goal anyway.

Such a reflection might help policy makers and such women themselves realise how, after all, gender inequality is still persistant in the entrepreneurship field and drawing on postfeminism does not necessarily help to support these women entrepreneurs' work–life balance.

Our findings underline the importance of a more gender inclusive entrepreneurship ecosystem, in which women entrepreneurs in both masculinised ánd feminised sectors are seen and treated as legitimate entrepreneurs.

Postfeminism, to our knowledge, has hardly been applied to women entrepreneurs' experiences in men-dominated environments, and is in itself still a rather new field in entrepreneurship studies.