Search results

Examining dominance in influencing leadership perceptions for men and women has received significant scholarly attention. The studies typically show that dominance is beneficial for men in attaining leadership positions but not for women. However, the studies were predominantly conducted more than two decades ago. Given the developments in gender research, this study extends the dominance line of inquiry by probing the impact of dominance need on leader emergence for men versus women in self-managed work teams. Furthermore, this study aims to examine if team dominance needs dispersion posits as a boundary condition for the combined impact of dominance needs and gender on leader emergence.

The authors conducted a longitudinal study that lasted one semester and involved 44 ad hoc self-managed work teams.

This study found that dominance needs facilitated leader emergence regardless of gender, and team dominance needs dispersion. Furthermore, men with high dominance needs were likelier to emerge as leaders than women with high dominance needs in high dominance needs dispersion teams. By contrast, women low in dominance needs received a harsher penalty in their leadership emergence than men low in dominance needs in low dominance needs dispersion teams

These results depart from the usual findings regarding the backlash effects that dominant women face and paint a rosy picture regarding the use of dominance in shaping leader emergence. However, the findings support the notion in gender stereotypes research that women are judged more critically than men in ascending to leadership positions.

Food waste constitutes a critical global dilemma, presenting substantial environmental, economic and social challenges, with around one-third of all food intended for human use being discarded annually. This waste depletes essential resources, increases greenhouse gas emissions and intensifies food poverty. Comprehending the factors contributing to food waste is crucial for formulating effective methods to alleviate this issue.

The responses have been collected from Indian households using longitudinal techniques. In Study 1, 481 respondents responded to the questions, and in Study 2, finally, 453 respondents responded.

This study examines the relationship between attitudes about food waste, intents to mitigate waste and several influencing factors like price sensitivity, altruistic behavior, awareness of food waste and societal norms.

The study seeks to elucidate consumer behavior by analyzing these relationships and identify practical interventions that can encourage a more sustainable food consumption approach, thereby aiding in the reduction of food waste and the promotion of responsible consumption practices.

Despite a sizeable body of innovation adoption scholarship, innovation failure rates are estimated to be in the range of 40% to 80%. This study aims to better explain the complex consumer decision-making journey by leveraging behavioral reasoning theory (BRT) and integrating the dichotomous influences of reasons for (RF) and reasons against (RA), and the role of moderators in a unified behavioral framework.

First, an exploratory reason elicitation study was conducted (n = 44) to propose a theoretical model with contextual reasons for and against constructs. Second, a quantitative study was conducted (n = 400) to validate the hypothesized structural relationships and the role of moderators.

Reasons for and against adoption are discrete constructs and significantly impact consumer attitudes and intentions. Reasons for adoption emerge as the strongest influencing factor in shaping consumer attitudes. Values influence intentions directly and via reasons but do not influence attitudes. Consumer innovativeness and external stressors moderate consumers’ resistance toward adopting innovations.

This study presents a novel approach for managers to generate deeper insights into consumer decision-making by integrating contextual reasons for and against, as well as the role of moderators in a unified behavioral framework. This approach enables managers to address both drivers and inhibitors of adoption in the specific radical innovation context they are working on.

This study integrates reasons for and against in a unified behavioral framework and applies it to radical technological innovations in an emerging market context. This study introduces novel constructs to BRT and examines the role of moderators in the BRT framework.