Search results

This chapter examines the value of an academic community as a space in which competing imperatives of collaboration and solo research may not only coexist but also interplay productively. It will critically analyse how developing collaborative practices within an unaffiliated research collective (Beyond Gender) has provided vital tools for building an interdisciplinary academic community within Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE). While the merits of cross-disciplinary collaboration and networking continue to be invoked in institutional strategic plans, academic reward systems continue to favour individual outputs and sole authorship. With researchers increasingly struggling with heavy workloads, it can be challenging to argue that the time and energy required to create and sustain meaningful professional networks is worthwhile. In this chapter, I demonstrate, however, that academic research is rarely the product of an individual. I advocate for collaborative working as a means of diversifying research knowledge and generating adaptable ways of working. I illustrate this by demonstrating how involvement in Beyond Gender has generated research activity at SRHE. It is increasingly acknowledged that mattering and belonging are helpful to our understanding of higher education and to creating effective learning spaces (Gravett, 2023; Carruthers Thomas, 2019). This chapter aligns with this growing area of scholarship, showing that mattering and belonging fostered through academic community building supports creativity and innovation in research.

This paper aims to explore the role of individual inner dimensions in fostering sustainable mindsets in accounting students and graduates. Individual inner dimensions such as compassion shape our behaviour and responses to sustainability challenges. Consideration of inner dimensions, in conjunction with sustainability knowledge and skill development, is needed for reshaping the accounting profession towards achieving sustainable futures.

The authors explore the role of individual inner dimensions in accounting and how approaches to cultivating compassion in other disciplinary educational settings could be applied to cultivate and facilitate compassion within accounting education. Approaches to cultivating compassion for human and non-human species within accounting education are presented, highlighting their relevance to accounting decisions and organisational accountability.

Cultivating compassion for human and non-human species within accounting education aligns with the broader role of accounting in social and environmental issues. Embedding compassionate approaches with a problem-solving focus within accounting pedagogies and curricula design could contribute to shaping behaviour and reorienting the mindsets of future accounting professionals.

Cultivating compassion within accounting students enhances connections across species, encourages students to recognise the role of compassion in sustainable decision-making and promotes a sustainable mindset. Enhanced compassion in accounting graduates could provide the motivational force for action-oriented responses from the accounting profession to the unprecedented ecological crisis.

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper presents a first step in exploring potential approaches to cultivating and facilitating compassion within accounting pedagogies and curricula design. This paper extends sustainability accounting education literature by considering individual inner dimensions in shifting mindsets of accounting students, graduates and educators towards sustainability.

While, supply chain resilience (SCRES) continues to be a dominant topic in both academic and business literature and has gained more attention recently, there is limited knowledge on SCRES capabilities specific to business functions. The purpose of this paper is to identify and investigate capabilities shared between supply, operations and logistics that are most important for SCRES.

To address this gap, the authors followed a multi-method research approach. First, the authors used the grounded theory method to generate a theoretical framework based on interviews with 51 managers from five companies in automotive SCs. Next, the authors empirically validated the framework using a survey of 340 SC professionals from the manufacturing industry.

Five significant capabilities emerged from the qualitative study; all were significant in empirical validation. This research advances the knowledge of SCRES as it informs managerial decision-making by identifying capabilities common to supply, logistics and operations that impact SCRES.

This research advances the knowledge of SCRES as it informs managerial decision-making by identifying capabilities common to supply, logistics and operations that impact SCRES. In addition, the findings of this research help managers better allocate resources among significant capabilities.