Search results

1 – 2 of 2
Article
Publication date: 4 February 2025

Ned Kock

Formative measurement, where indicators are frequently seen as causing their corresponding latent variables, is extensively used in information systems research and in such a way…

Abstract

Purpose

Formative measurement, where indicators are frequently seen as causing their corresponding latent variables, is extensively used in information systems research and in such a way as to attract methodological criticism to the entire field. This paper aims to ameliorate this situation.

Design/methodology/approach

Anchored on a new measurement residual theory, this paper argues that a latent variable always exists before the corresponding indicators when data is collected via questionnaires, whether reflective or formative measurement is used. Consequently, this paper posits that the direction of causality going from indicators to latent variables normally associated with formative measurement is misguided.

Findings

This paper develops a theory-driven set of recommendations for the assessment of formative measurement quality, addressing the following elements: factor reliability, indicator redundancy, significance of indicator weights, indicator effect sizes, Simpson’s paradox instances associated with indicators, model-wide factor redundancy and use of analytic composites.

Research limitations/implications

The new theory and related recommendations are illustrated based on an empirical study of 290 geographically distributed product innovation teams that used various electronic communication media to conduct their work.

Originality/value

The data is analyzed with the software WarpPLS, a widely used structural equation modeling tool that allows for formative measurement assessment and analytic composite utilization in ways that are fully compatible with the theory-driven set of recommendations presented in this paper.

Details

Journal of Systems and Information Technology, vol. ahead-of-print no. ahead-of-print
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 1328-7265

Keywords

Article
Publication date: 6 January 2025

Ned Kock, Mohamed Yacine Haddoud, Adah-Kole Onjewu and Shiyu Yang

This inquiry extends the discourse on job satisfaction and employee referral. It aims to examine the moderating effects of perceived business outlook and CEO approval in the…

Abstract

Purpose

This inquiry extends the discourse on job satisfaction and employee referral. It aims to examine the moderating effects of perceived business outlook and CEO approval in the dynamics of job satisfaction and employee referral. A model predicting job satisfaction and employee referral through the lens of Herzberg’s two-factor theory is developed and tested.

Design/methodology/approach

To remedy the overreliance on self-reported surveys, impeding generalization and representativeness, this study uses large evidence from 14,840 voluntary disclosures of US employees. A structural equation modeling technique is adopted to test the hypotheses.

Findings

The inherent robust path analysis revealed intriguing findings highlighting culture and values as exerting the most substantial positive impact on job satisfaction, while diversity and inclusion played a relatively trivial role. Moreover, employees’ view of the firms’ outlook and their approval of the incumbent CEO were found to strengthen the job satisfaction–referral nexus.

Originality/value

The study revisits the relationship between job satisfaction and employee referral by capturing the moderating effects of perceived business outlook and CEO approval. We believe that this investigation is one of the first to capture the impact of these two pivotal factors.

Details

Personnel Review, vol. 54 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0048-3486

Keywords

1 – 2 of 2