Search results

The purpose of this study was to examine the moderating role of institutional ownership on the relationship between board gender diversity and earnings management (EM) among listed firms in East African Community (EAC) partner states.

The study used a sample of 71 firms listed in the EAC partner states over 2011–2020. Data were handpicked from the individual firm's audited annual financial reports. Based on the results of the Hausman test, the study used the results of the fixed-effect regression model to test the hypotheses. To test the robustness of the results, the study employed an alternative measure of EM and two additional econometric techniques, including the pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) and the system generalized method of moments (GMM).

The empirical findings revealed that female directors improve the board's effectiveness in monitoring managerial roles. Specifically, the results showed a significantly negative relationship between the proportion of women in the corporate board and EM (as measured by discretionary accruals (DAs)). The findings further revealed an inverse relationship between the proportion of institutional ownership and EM. Finally, the results further demonstrated that institutional ownership enhances the role of board gender diversity in mitigating EM among listed firms in the EAC.

The findings of this study may be useful to managers, investors and regulators in assessing the role of institutional ownership and women's participation on corporate boards as a strategy for alleviating unethical manipulation of earnings.

The findings of this study contribute to the growing concern on gender inequality, especially the marginalization of women from the paid labor force and decision-making. The findings highlight the importance of having more women in the corporate board since this may help in mitigating corporate fraud. Similarly, the findings highlight the importance of institutional ownership as a corporate governance (CG) tool.

Previous studies have reported mixed empirical results on whether board gender diversity mitigates EM. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first paper to fill the existing gap by exploring whether institutional ownership moderates the relationship between board gender diversity and EM among listed firms in the EAC.

This study introduces influential-female-directors as a board-gender-diversity variable that captures not only the female representation on the board but also their position on the informal-boardroom-hierarchy. Further, this study investigates whether such directors have a significant influence on the dividend-payout-decisions of leading firms in an emerging economy, India, where concentrated ownership is prevalent and explores the moderation effect they exert on dividend–ownership relationship.

This study uses generalized methods of moments (GMM) to tackle the issues put forth by the sample of 450 firm-year observations.

This study finds that influential-female-directors have a significant influence on the dividend-payout-decisions of the firm. Additionally, the presence of female directors in the audit-committee makes the board more vigilant and encourages foreign institutional investors to expect more dividends. Furthermore, domestic institutional investors expect a return on their investments through share price appreciation rather than dividends, and the influence of promoters in dividend-payout-decisions is reduced in the presence of such directors.

This study pioneers the use of influential-female-directors as a board-gender-diversity metric and carries an in-depth analysis of the influence and moderation effect they exert on the dividend-payout-decisions of the board and the dividend expectations of different institutional investors, respectively.

We aim to compare multifunctionality, ecosystem services and just transition as overall conceptual approaches to understand agri-food systems.

This is a theory-motivated literature study.

This paper argues that the concepts of multifunctionality and ecosystem services are unsuitable for considering the systemic complexities of today’s food system in order to tackle its grave environmental and social problems. Furthermore, these two concepts tend to neglect the negative externalities of food systems and overemphasize the positive ones. The notion of just transition puts justice and sustainability at the center of agri-food studies and defines targeted systemic interventions in food systems.

While the approach of just transition is only starting to be widely applied to the agriculture–food nexus, we argue that it is better suited to re-orient diets, production processes, the value chain and labor conditions in a more sustainable direction. The just transition approach is also useful in drafting systemic policy innovations.

The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-09-2023-0740