Search results

This research examines the influence of financial secrecy culture on audit fees. Additionally, we investigate the potential moderating effect of adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on the relationship between financial secrecy culture and audit fees.

We use an international dataset comprising 249,217 firm-year observations from 30 countries/regions listed between 1996 and 2022. Our analysis includes regression analysis, the Heckman self-selection bias test, change analysis and various robustness tests.

Our results reveal a significant positive association between audit fees and firms listed in secretive jurisdictions, suggesting that auditors charge higher fees to accommodate additional audit effort or risk premiums. Furthermore, our empirical findings indicate that implementing IFRS in countries/regions with higher levels of secrecy introduces complexities or ambiguities in audit procedures, leading to increased audit fees. These results hold up under rigorous endogeneity tests and remain consistent across alternative measures and tests.

Our findings establish a direct link between financial secrecy and audit fees, demonstrating higher costs for firms with greater secrecy. Additionally, they show that implementing IFRS in secretive jurisdictions intensifies audit complexities, resulting in higher fees. These findings emphasize the critical importance of transparency, regulatory compliance and risk management in financial reporting, with implications for investor confidence and regulatory strategies.

This study contributes to the literature by exploring the previously unexamined relationship between financial secrecy culture and audit fees while also assessing the moderating effect of IFRS adoption. By utilizing a comprehensive international dataset spanning multiple jurisdictions and years, our research provides valuable insights into cross-border variations in audit practices and their broader implications.

This research investigates the impact of corporate donations on the cost of equity capital. We argue that corporate donations reduce firm risk and improve reputation, affecting the cost of equity.

We employ a large international sample of 44 countries from 2002 to 2019. We use several econometric methods and conduct a range of sensitivity tests to examine the robustness of findings.

We find that corporate donations reduce the cost of equity capital. In terms of economic significance, the study shows that one standard deviation increase in corporate donations leads to a 12.9 to 14.9 basis point decrease in the cost of equity capital. The additional analyses reveal that donation patterns, country-specific attributes and macroeconomic characteristics likely influence the findings. Our results are robust to a batch of sensitivity tests, including GMM regression analysis and tests with alternative measures for corporate donations and the cost of equity capital.

Our research findings have practical implications. Policymakers can encourage firms to undertake philanthropic activities to reduce business risk, which benefits both firms and investors.

We contribute to the theoretical discussion about the role of corporate philanthropy. We argue that firm risk is reduced due to philanthropic activities such as corporate donations. Overall, our results suggest that corporate donations affect worldwide external financing costs.

This study examines the moderating role of female directors on the relationship between the firms’ characteristics and tax avoidance in an emerging economy.

This study employs the second-generation unit root test and the generalised method of moments (GMM) techniques. The Kao residual cointegration test corroborates a long-run cointegration among variables.

Female directors demonstrate mixed and unusual findings. No significant impact of female directors on tax avoidance is found. In addition, the presence of female directors does not show any negative or significant moderating impacts on the relationship between leverage, firm age, board size and tax avoidance. However, having more female directors can negatively and significantly moderate the relationship between more profitable firms, larger firms and tax avoidance. These findings show that the board of directors could use the presence of female directors to maximise their opportunistic behaviour, such as to avoid tax.

Research limitations – The study is limited by considering only 62 listed firms. The scope could be extended to include non-listed firms.

Research implications – There is increasing pressure for female directors on boards from diverse stakeholders, such as the European Commission, national governments, politicians, employer lobby groups, shareholders, and Fortune and Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) rankings. This study provides input to decision-makers putting gender quota laws into practice. Our findings can help policy-makers adopt regulatory reforms to control tax avoidance practices and enhance organisational legitimacy. Policymakers can change their policy to include female directors up to the threshold suggested by the critical mass theory.

This is the first attempt in Bangladesh to explore the role of female directors in the relationship between the firms' characteristics and tax avoidance. The current study has significant ramifications for bringing gender diversity into practice as a component of good corporate governance.

This study aims to examine the nonlinear effects of board size and board independence on the corporate sustainability performance of listed firms worldwide.

This study uses the global environmental, social and governance (ESG) dataset from the Thomson Reuters database, which includes a sample of 23,766 firm-year observations from 33 countries from 2011 to 2022.

The results indicate that board size and independence have positive impacts on corporate sustainability performance; however, these relationships are nonlinear. The authors find an inverted U-shaped relationship for board size. After the optimal point, the positive relationship between board size and corporate sustainability performance becomes negative. Board independence, however, has a positive exponential relationship in which the positive effect increases exponentially after the optimal point. The results are robust to a battery of tests, including alternative measures for corporate sustainability performance, board independence and different estimation procedures.

This study illustrates empirical evidence on the nonlinear effect of board size and board independence on corporate sustainability performance, which explains the mixed evidence involving board size and independence in corporate sustainability literature and offers a complementary research approach in the literature on board dynamics.

This study has practical implications for investors aiming for sustainable and ethical investment choices, as they should be mindful of matters relating to board composition, particularly the appointment of independent directors and ideal board size.

Extensive empirical evidence has examined the relationship between corporate governance variables and corporate sustainability performance. This study introduces the effect of the nonlinear relationship between board size and board independence on corporate sustainability performance using international evidence.