Search results

Following Joseph Schumpeter's conception of innovation as ‘new innovations’, this chapter contends that innovations that transform lives in developing countries of Southern Africa are not radically new and different novelties but rather ‘new combinations’ at the interface of new materialisations (creative expression) and exploitations of new opportunities (entrepreneurship). We argue that this posture is not a contestation of the reality that novelty enter the system through the development of new technologies, processes and new ways of organising, but rather such novelty is a process of recombining existing elements in new ways. I build on this argument to demonstrate that in resource-poor contexts where institutional voids frustrate entrepreneurs' potential to deploy innovation capabilities for generating groundbreaking innovation, innovations and entrepreneurship are outcomes of ‘tinkering’, improvision and refinement of unsophisticated creative ideas. Drawing on exemplars from health, education, finance and poverty alleviation interventions that support sustainable human development, I also demonstrate that high knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship (KIE) and low knowledge-intensive frugal innovations are mutually constitutive and recursive outputs of the interaction of knowledge application and innovation conversion rather than serial processes of cause and effect. Using combinative innovation, internal coupling and combinative capabilities as heuristics for understanding the entrepreneurship–innovation nexus, I provide empirical support to the view that entrepreneurial effectuation, new combinations, bricolage and improvision constitute useful cognitive arena for the conversion of entrepreneurial and innovation behaviours, practices and processes into KIE and frugal innovation outputs.

Nowadays, an analysis of the circumstances that have led to the development of specific industries within regional entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) is extremely relevant. The chapter carries out a twofold analysis, in order to fully explore the reasons that have led to the creation of a specific industrial district. On the one hand, the tissue paper industry in the Italian province of Lucca is analysed through a qualitative approach; on the other hand, the contextual traits of the Toscana EE influencing firm performance are investigated through using a quantitative research approach. This mixed research analysis provides some important hints. First, it helps to understand how systemic, framework and human conditions affect firm performance. Second, it examines how historical, social, and economic factors have shaped regional industries. Through an in-depth analysis, the chapter provides theoretical and empirical insights into the dynamics that affect industrial transformation in response to globalisation, technological innovation, and changing market demands. After completing the chapter, readers will understand how knowledge, collaboration, and shared resources drive regional competitiveness. Through the qualitative analysis, readers will be aware of the tissue paper industry evolution. The combination with the quantitative study allows us to capture the different drivers swaying firm performance, such as infrastructure, innovation capacity, and institutional support. Therefore, the use of empirical data enables for a more objective assessment of the earlier contextual elements, revealing trends and patterns that may not be immediately evident through qualitative analysis.

Over the past 20 years, entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) have emerged as a significant research field, inspiring several scholars to provide valuable contributions. The chapter aims to map the current state of literature by highlighting the most prominent research strands and the main theoretical lenses employed in the research field. By carrying out a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis, the study examines articles published over a period of 27 years. The time frame from 1996 to 2023 offers an extensive outlook of the field’s evolution and current trends, resulting in the identification of five research strands and different future research avenues. From the analysis of prior research works, this study provides an in-depth examination of the complex nature of EEs. The results hold theoretical and practical implications. From the scholars’ point of view, they offer future research directions to move the current level of knowledge forward. From the entrepreneurs’ perspective, they provide valuable insights to address ongoing challenges and catch new opportunities within the dynamic panorama of EEs. Therefore, the insights are poised to drive future research, inform policymakers, and enhance business strategies aimed at fostering resilient EEs. In other words, the purpose is to provide readers with a well-rounded understanding over the state of the literature on EEs and the research strands that deserve further exploration.

This research investigates the determinants of public perception of contribution of cultural and creative industries (CCIs) in Croatia disaggregated by subsectors and the perceived role of government policy on cultural and creative industries. Based on the survey data, it empirically explored how well citizens/consumers are familiar with cultural and creative industries, their usage of cultural and creative industry products and services, and their attitudes towards cultural and creative industries. Findings that many people use them without being aware they are consuming cultural and creative industries' outputs and that benefits of cultural and creative sectors are not recognized by the public in Croatia indicate that future sectoral policy should, among others, include the public campaigns about cultural and creative industries. A well-thought-out and systematic policy for the development of the cultural and creative industries in Croatia is lacking despite public opinion on the key role of the government in that matter. Low public awareness of cultural and creative industries might stand as one of the reasons why this sector in Croatia is lagging behind the European Union. Therefore, the findings are framed to facilitate policy decision-making to encourage cultural and creative industries in Croatia.

Incumbent organizations are being challenged to carry out the transformative change induced by digital transformation. They often address the challenge by creating diverse, cross-functional teams called breakthrough teams to imagine, plan and execute the change. The teams operate under two opposing pressures: the team’s members must undertake their daily work in the exploitative environment of the incumbent and engage in bold explorations dictated by the team’s change mandate. To address the poor understanding of what makes such teams effective in such organizations, we ask: What team-level factors influence the extent to which breakthrough teams effectively pursue their radical mandate?

We hypothesize the effect of a team-level factor called “relational climate” – the team’s vision, compassion and relational energy – on team performance defined as innovating radically innovation and engaging in effective processes. We posit that the effect is fully mediated by the team’s two boundary mechanisms – spanning and buffering – which define how the team interacts with its environment. We validate the research model using survey data from 184 teams in 90 organizations engaged in digital transformation.

We find that teams’ boundary mechanisms fully mediate the effect of the relational climate on radical innovation and process performance. Selective incentives and higher-level information technology (IT) capabilities also have a significant effect on radical innovation.

This study is motivated by the need for scholars and practitioners alike to better understand how to create and manage teams that have radical change mandates. Managers currently are pushed to explore high-growth, high-risk change by establishing cross-functional teams to accomplish such mandates. Our study suggests a two-pronged approach to improve the performance of these teams: (1) cultivate and sustain a strong intra-team climate, enabling a radical vision to emerge, and (2) apply principles to manage team boundaries by determining what needs to be protected from the environment and what needs to be opened to it.

To date, research has focused on organizational and individual-level antecedents of radical change, while team-level studies have focused on marketing and new product development (NPD) teams, which are devoid of radical mandates. The study addresses incumbent firms’ challenge of managing the radical innovation created by digital transformation and demonstrates the significance of three team-level factors on team performance: relational climate, buffering and spanning. To our knowledge, our theoretical model is the first to draw on these constructs to explain team-level radical innovation outcomes.

Entrepreneurship education is transforming from traditional teacher-led classrooms to student-centred learning environments, where effectuation principles are increasingly adopted as a pedagogical framework. Yet despite its promise for developing real-world entrepreneurial capabilities, the implementation of effectuation principles in classrooms reveals a striking pattern: while some student teams excel, others struggle or even revert to passive learning approaches. Such variation in team responses raises an important question about the underlying mechanisms influencing team responses. This article aims to fill that gap by understanding why some student teams excel and others struggle in the higher education (HE) effectuation classroom.

A multiple case study involving 29 student teams enrolled in an undergraduate entrepreneurship class that is based on effectuation principles at a HE institution was conducted.

The study identifies three distinct responses among student teams. The first group displays apathy, and the second group rejects the process after a few classroom sessions. Both groups encounter student-centred learning identity threats. In contrast, the third group, despite facing similar identity threats, manages to persist.

This study argues that teaching and learning effectuation is more complex than generally depicted in the literature. It uncovers necessary and sufficient conditions related to students overcoming student-centred learning identity threats. By doing so, the study contributes to the understanding of why the connection between teaching effectuation and learning effectual behaviour is more intricate than previously understood. Additionally, it offers important practical implications for entrepreneurship educators and programme designers at HE institutions.

This introductory chapter presents the book’s rationale and structure and reflects on the notion of ‘fragmented powers’ as a key entry into understanding evolving power dynamics in the English-speaking world. Combining historical and contemporary perspectives, from the late 18th century to the contemporary era, fragmentation as a non-linear process reveals the tensions between centralisation and decentralisation, as well as confrontation and cooperation in the fields of constitutional and institutional issues, politics and political party systems, the media, and in urban and social policies at both the intra-national and transnational levels. The adoption of a long view perspective and a multidisciplinary approach allows to critically assess the concept of fragmentation by questioning both its positive and negative effects on the cultural, political and socio-economic environments.

This study aims to examine the combinations of internal and external knowledge flows between research and development (R&D) incumbents and start-ups in the context of open innovation. While there is a growing body of knowledge that has examined how, in a knowledge economy, a firm’s knowledge and innovation activities are closely linked, there is no systematic review available of the key antecedents, perspectives, phenomenon and outcomes of knowledge spillovers.

The authors have conducted dual-stage research. First, the authors conducted a systematic review of literature (97 research articles) by following the theories–contexts–methods framework and the antecedent-phenomenon-outcomes logic. The authors identified the key theories, contexts, methods, antecedents, phenomenon and outcomes of knowledge spillovers between R&D-driven incumbents and start-ups in the open innovation context. In the second stage, the findings of stage one were leveraged to advance a nomological network that depicts the strength of the relationship between the observable constructs that emerged from the review.

The findings demonstrate how knowledge spillovers can help incumbent organisations and start-ups to achieve improved innovation capabilities, R&D capacity, competitive advantage and the creation of knowledge ecosystems leading to improved firm performance. This study has important implications for practitioners and managers – it provides managers with important antecedents of knowledge spillover (knowledge capacities and knowledge types), which directly impact the R&D intensity and digitalisation driving open innovation. The emerging network showed that the antecedents of knowledge spillovers have a direct relationship with the creation of a knowledge ecosystem orchestrated by incumbents and that there is a very strong influence of knowledge capacities and knowledge types on the selection of external knowledge partners/sources.

This study has important implications for practitioners and managers. In particular, it provides managers with important antecedents of knowledge spillover (knowledge capacities and knowledge types), which directly impact the R&D intensity and digitalisation driving open innovation. This will enable managers to take important decisions about what knowledge capacities are required to achieve innovation outcomes. The findings suggest that managers of incumbent firms should be cautious when deciding to invest in knowledge sourcing from external partners. This choice may be driven by the absorptive capacity of the incumbent firm, market competition, protection of intellectual property and public policy supporting innovation and entrepreneurship.

Identification of the key antecedents, phenomenon and outcomes of knowledge spillovers between R&D-driven incumbents and start-ups in the open innovation context. The findings from Stage 1 helped us to advance a nomological network in Stage 2, which identifies the strength and influence of the various observable constructs (identified from the review) on each other. No prior study, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, has advanced a nomological network in the context of knowledge spillovers between R&D-driven incumbents and start-ups in the open innovation context.

The purpose of the paper is to explore Chinese women entrepreneurs’ perceptions of governance within the Shanghai fashion entrepreneurial ecosystem (SFEE) and identify whether policy is effective and inclusive of women entrepreneurs, potential barriers and if implementation is proceeding as planned.

We used an adaptive qualitative method incorporating a traditional case study utilizing a thematic analysis with a feminist approach to policy analysis. The case study is based on original data from ethnographic practices with a purposive sample of 15 fashion entrepreneurs and triangulated with six political elites within the SFEE.

The findings indicate that women fashion entrepreneurs perceive effective governance of the SFEE, legitimizing top-down policies and resources as the “right time” for them to be women and entrepreneurs in Shanghai. Entrepreneurs claim “I am human,” asserting gender equality in business but with circumstantial gender roles that can limit access to important resources.

A single industry, the SFEE, limits the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, did the respondents feel comfortable with the truth? True to communist nations, citizens have few opportunities to voice opinions and public dissent is discouraged. However, we took steps to protect anonymity and excluded potentially sensitive questions dealing with geopolitical strife.

The study outlined six SFEE governance challenges and feminist policy responses that will strengthen the future of women’s entrepreneurship. The study can introduce classroom discussions on gender dynamics and entrepreneurship in the global context. This can help students understand the unique challenges women face, such as access to funding, networking opportunities and societal expectations, and how these factors influence the global supply chain.

The case study has several contributions, including a novel entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) governance framework and the first study to endorse the voice of Chinese women entrepreneurs operating within the Shanghai fashion industry. Further, we contextualize entrepreneurship using anthropological methods. Lastly, the analysis and understanding of SFEE policies have the potential to improve women’s lives, their families and communities.