Search results

This paper considers the exhibition: UnDoing. This research-through-curation project examined interactions within existing spaces and situations. This established links between the selected exhibits, the gallery, the city and with the continuum of the previous exhibition.

Carefully selected architects, designers and artists were invited to contribute—those who pursued a contextual approach; whose practice explored the way buildings, places and artefacts are reused, reinterpreted and remembered.

Through the act of curation, this research uncovered a series of different approaches to constructed sites and existing buildings, from layered juxtaposition, the refusal to undo, to interventions of new elements within architectural works.

Curation offered the opportunity to consider works of architecture and of art through the same lens, for direct comparisons to be made and the influence of one upon the other to be comprehended.

The examination processes the architect employs is similar to that of the artist; the development of an understanding of place, and from this synthesis, creative interpretation. However, despite the similarities in the starting position, the elucidation developed by the artist can be vastly different to that of the architect.

The juxtaposition and new classifications created by the exhibition encouraged visitors to look at art, architecture and the city in a different way; to grasp the direct link between the different subjects; and the possibilities created.

The two driving factors for UnDoing were places of previous occupation and the city of Manchester. The qualities of surrounding constructed environment combined were combined with attitudes towards existing structures and places.

This study aims to redirect attention from the symbolic significance of global iconic architecture towards exploring its impact and significance within their situated urban context; seeking to unpack whether and how a “situated multiplicity” of residents collectively shape these structures into local icons through their embodied performance and active engagement, creating an “urban meaning” rather than symbolic meaning.

We conducted an inductive empirical analysis of the Taipei Performing Arts Centre (TPAC), using a mixed-method iterative approach including 160 surveys, observational mapping, and 53 interviews with citizens and experts in the TPAC neighbourhood.

The spectacular image of a global icon can sometimes alienate citizens because of its design, and thus affect their embodied performance. However, we found divergent interpretations of iconicity, including residents who see economic, cultural and social benefits, and contributions to the internationalisation of local urban landscapes. Future aspirations for engagement with the TPAC are centred on the public plaza, highlighting the importance of prioritising public spaces in the design and operation of iconic buildings to foster community engagement and social interactions.

The study’s findings have implications for policy makers, planners and architects seeking to embed global iconic buildings into neighbourhood planning initiatives.

Minimal scholarly attention has been paid to citizens’ perspectives of iconic buildings. By addressing this gap, we contribute to a holistic perspective of how active and embodied practices shape the urban context and give it meaning. Furthermore, this study suggests practical ways in which such buildings can serve various populations.

The purpose of this conceptual paper is to demonstrate how memes perpetuate trauma with a schematic. This conceptual paper uses the “begin with the end in mind” meme to format the presentation of the necessary components for the schematic of how trauma persists across generations. It is the third paper in a series of applications of the recursive, test-operate-test schematic to the systemic effects of the information processes involved in trauma. The schematic presented permits evaluations of solutions to interrupt the generational trauma cycle.

The required schematic components are described. Trauma (actual or perceived threat to survival) will be briefly discussed. Evolutionary processes that create the psychophysiology necessary to support nominal social expectations (NSEs) memes and metaphors will be summarized. The development of NSEs will be discussed. Metaphors and memes necessary for the creation of the schematic and esoteric events at level Learning IV will be briefly described. Finally, Figure 3, which illustrates the maintenance of NSEs and attempts to prevent their violation, will be explained.

It is asserted that functional human social behavior requires NSEs. Trauma is found to persist through the presence of anti-nominal NSE memes that are transduced by the individual into anti-nominal metaphors, which then damage grid, place and dentate gyrus cell (GPDG) neurophysiology. The damaged neurocircuits allow the use of anti-nominal NSE metaphors within our individual neurophysiology. Furthermore, anti-NSE memes interfere with the self-organized criticalities (SOCs) of genetic-epigenetic processes necessary for the intergenerational transfer of functional social behavior. When anti-NSE nominal metaphors are transduced back into anti-NSEs, social niche memes, the trauma process is reiterated. Anti-NSE memes and metaphors are found to be inappropriate criteria central to the maintenance of persistent trauma. Therefore, anti-NSE memes have hijacked our epigenetics and our social niches. Solutions are available because during our evolution, the Homo clade developed esoteric capabilities and the ability to bring back what information we can from those encounters. This physiology operates around the 5HT2A neural receptors that process hallucinogens, such as psilocybin. Accessing this resource system, either through naturally occurring altered states of consciousness or through micro-dose pharmaceutical psilocybin and related neurotransmitters, produces a significant structural change in the GPDG system to reset the NSE system illustrated in the schematic to its nominal status so that we can maintain nominal NSE relationships within our meme niche(s).

The source of persistent trauma in our social niche(s), the means by which the trauma is maintained and the means to mitigate and perhaps eliminate persistent trauma are identified. Based on these three conclusions, it is difficult to make decisions regarding corrective actions because of ubiquitous anti-NSE memes and because of the limitations of our ordinary consciousness.

If we wish to survive as a species, we will need to discover the criteria necessary to maintain our niche(s) congruent SOCs and use them instead of tyrannical memes described by Dawkins (1989) to make decisions about ourselves and our niche(s).

Significant courage is required to identify the memes that maintain trauma because many of them are culturally sacred cows. Unfortunately, we have known since Bremner's (1995) MRI study of posttraumatic stress disorder that trauma causes brain damage. Fortunately, our NSE genes compel us to pursue restitution of the memes that maintain our trauma-inducing cultures.

Several original assertions are presented. While the Homo clade ancestors began the creation of the social niche(s) that led to Homo sapiens sapiens, it is asserted that the australopiths created the NSE memes which are the foundation behaviors that permit our social niche(s). Furthermore, NSEs were produced by enhanced intentionality skills and NSEs were created by both genetic and memetic processes. The evolution of intentionality-NSE neural networks is asserted as the source of intentional material manipulation. While anti-NSE memes are claimed as the source of persistent trauma, the practice of esoteric technologies is presented as a solution to persistent trauma.

This study explores how corporate social responsibility (CSR) and artificial intelligence (AI) can be combined in the healthcare industry during the post-COVID-19 recovery phase. The aim is to showcase how this fusion can help tackle healthcare inequalities, enhance accessibility and support long-term sustainability.

Adopting a viewpoint approach, the study leverages existing literature and case studies to analyze the intersection of CSR and AI. It investigates AI’s capabilities in predictive analytics, telemedicine and resource management within the framework of CSR principles.

Integrating AI and CSR can profoundly enhance healthcare delivery by ensuring equitable access, optimizing resource allocation and fostering trust through transparency and ethical standards. This synergy benefits public health and enhances the corporate image and long-term viability of healthcare organizations.

The study is conceptual and relies on existing literature and case studies. Future research should empirically test the proposed models and frameworks in diverse healthcare settings to validate and refine these insights.

The insights from this study can be directly applied by healthcare organizations to develop policies and practices that integrate AI and CSR. This integration can promote ethical standards, enhance operational efficiency and, most importantly, improve patient outcomes.

Integrating AI and CSR in the healthcare sector carries consequences. It plays a role in promoting fairness among patients, bridging gaps in healthcare services, and boosting trust and independence through the clear and responsible use of AI technologies. This highlights the groundbreaking impact of this research within the healthcare industry.

This paper offers a viewpoint perspective on the strategic alignment of AI and CSR, presenting a novel approach to creating resilient healthcare systems in the post-COVID-19 era. It provides healthcare managers and policymakers with valuable insights on leveraging AI within CSR frameworks to achieve sustainable healthcare solutions, thereby contributing significantly to the field.

This study aims to analyze the psychological benefits of digital and paper-based cognitive training in users with a lack of technological knowledge and a low level of education.

In total, 60 individuals (Mage = 78.38; SDage = 9.15) attending a day center were recruited to complete a cognitive training program, 30 of them in digital format. They were all assessed on cognitive skills, technological knowledge and depressive symptomatology before and after the training. Regardless of age, education and technological knowledge, all participants completed the respective cognitive training program.

The results of this study indicate that it is feasible to use both digital and paper-based tasks in cognitive training for individuals aged over 60, with low levels of education and digital literacy. Although different, in both cases it will be possible to obtain cognitive benefits.

Cognitive training with digital or paper-based material can facilitate visual mnesic processing. Both visual and verbal skills can be trained through other non-digital materials.

This study contributes to understanding the benefits of both types of materials used in working with older people.