Search results

The research addresses the issue of elitism in international trade and the barriers in global markets arising from the elitist criteria for transitioning to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The research aims to identify criteria and pathways for achieving a favorable business climate for the transition to IFRS. Based on international statistics from the World Bank for 2019–2021, the authors identify the determinants of the adoption of IFRS using regression analysis. The authors performed econometric modeling of participation in international trade on global markets based on IFRS factors. As a result, the research selected criteria for a favorable business climate for transitioning to IFRS. The selected criteria are feasible for adherence by all countries and ensure the inclusivity of IFRS. The selected criteria include (in decreasing order of significance): improvement of the investment climate, development of public–private partnerships, overcoming the shadow economy, and strengthening the legal environment. The theoretical significance of the author's conclusions lies in the reevaluation of criteria for a favorable business climate for transitioning to IFRS in the context of new, multipolar globalization. The conclusions formulate a set of inclusive criteria that support free international trade and the openness of global markets. The practical significance of the results obtained in the research is that they outline a path to achieving a favorable business climate in Russia and propose a set of authorial recommendations for transitioning Russian businesses to IFRS.

The research focuses on the problem of the mismatch between the current approach to corporate accounting and reporting according to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the new paradigm of international entrepreneurship development in Russia. The research aims to identify global prerequisites and prospects for improving the approach to corporate accounting and reporting of international entrepreneurship according to IFRS in Russia. Drawing on international experience in developing digital economies from 2021 to 2023, the authors apply regression analysis to create an econometric model of IFRS application in international entrepreneurship. The model determines patterns of changes in the investment attractiveness of the economy for foreign investments as corporate accounting and reporting in international entrepreneurship are automated using big data, smart analytics, and other digital technologies. The main authors' conclusion is that smart automation of corporate accounting and reporting in international entrepreneurship according to IFRS ensures an influx of foreign investments. The theoretical significance lies in developing a new approach to corporate accounting and reporting for international entrepreneurship according to IFRS in Russia. The practical significance is expressed in the perspective offered to enhance the attractiveness of Russia's economy for foreign investments through smart automation of corporate accounting and reporting for international entrepreneurship according to IFRS. This can be utilized, first, in the business practices of international entrepreneurship in Russia to increase investment attractiveness for foreign investors. Second, it can be utilized in the state economic policy to stimulate the influx of foreign investments into the digitalization of Russia's economy.

This chapter explores current issues related to the professional training and activities of independent experts conducting anti-corruption expertise of regulatory legal acts and their projects. The main problem in this area is the lack of unified approaches to determining the level of competence and assessing the special professional knowledge, skills, and abilities of individuals involved in preparing conclusions based on the results of anti-corruption expertise of normative legal documents. Moreover, the stated problem remains practically relevant because certain difficulties arise not only in developing specific, empirically verified, and scientifically justified criteria for selecting independent experts and determining their activity but also in implementing the procedure for assessing the quality of conducted expertise at the federal and regional levels of governance. Over time, with the further development of the institution of anti-corruption expertise of regulatory legal acts, the demand for highly qualified independent experts will only increase. To effectively meet the growing demand for specialists of this level, it is necessary to establish a special system for their competency-oriented training and evaluation of the results of their activities. Solving this task will require making certain changes to general and special legal norms of the existing legislation, as well as further improving the practice of their application.

Quality 4.0 is being presented as the new stage of quality development. However, its overlying concept and rationale are still hard to define. To better understand what different authors and studies advocate being Quality 4.0, a systematic literature review was undertaken on the topic. This paper presents the results of such review, providing some avenues for further research on quality management.

The documents for the systematic literature review have been searched on the Scopus database, using the search equation: [TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Quality 4.0”) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (Quality Management” AND (“Industry 4.0” OR “Fourth Industr*” OR i4.0))]. Documents were filtered by language and by type. Of the 367 documents identified, 146 were submitted to exploratory content analysis.

The analyzed documents essentially provide theoretical discussions on what Quality 4.0 is or should be. Five categories have emerged from the content analysis undertaken: Industry 4.0 and the Rise of a New Approach to Quality; Motivations, Readiness Factors and Barriers to a Quality 4.0 Approach; Digital Quality Management Systems; Combination of Quality Tools and Lean Methodologies and Quality 4.0 Professionals.

It was hard to find studies reporting how quality is actually being managed in organizations that already operate in the Industry 4.0 paradigm. Answers could not be found to questions regarding actual practices, methodologies and tools being used in Quality 4.0 approaches. However, the research undertaken allowed to identify in the literature different ways of conceptualizing and analyzing Quality 4.0, opening up avenues for further research on quality management in the Industry 4.0 era.

This paper offers a broad look at how quality management is changing in response to the affirmation of the Industry 4.0 paradigm.