Search results

The analysis in Chapter 5 argues that Alt Tech platforms should not be considered alternatives in the sense of offering new socio-technological paradigms, but rather as political alternatives which have emerged in reaction to the mainstream platforms' governance models, particularly regarding hate speech regulation. This distinction is crucial for understanding the role of Alt Tech platforms in the digital discourse on freedom, equality and security.

This chapter outlines the connection between mainstream platforms and the emergence of Alt Tech, focusing on the phenomena of a ‘platform for all’ and deplatforming, which are more about increasing security measures than ideological stances. It challenges the perception of Alt Tech as mere alternatives, drawing on Foucault's governmentality and Arendt's notions of freedom and politics. The discussion extends to how Alt Tech platforms redefine freedom of expression, promote a form of universal equality that overlooks hate speech regulation and place the onus of ‘trust and safety’ on users, contrasting sharply with mainstream approaches. By examining these platforms' governance and agendas, particularly through the case study of Christian Freedom in Gab, this chapter reveals how Alt Tech significantly contributes to broadening the debate on hate speech, freedom and equality in the digital realm, as active participants in shaping these discussions.