Search results

To explain an administrative law judge (ALJ) decision, along with a censure, fine, and industry disbarment, against an investment adviser for misleading advertising and false claims of compliance with Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS).

Explains the background to GIPS, the investment adviser’s GIPS violations, the significance of the case, and lessons to be learned by investment advisors on compliance with GIPS standards.

The decision is particularly significant because the ALJ issued such severe sanctions based solely on false claims of GIPS compliance notwithstanding the fact that all reported performance returns were accurate and no investors relied on or were harmed by the false claims of compliance.

The Zavanelli case should serve to put firms on notice that persistent noncompliance with the GIPS standards can have serious consequences and that all marketing materials should be subject to effective review and approval policies and procedures prior to distribution or publication to ensure compliance with the GIPS standards.

Practical guidance from experienced financial services lawyers.