Canjun Chen, Lelin Lv and Changxin Xu
Grounded in upper echelons theory (UET) and conflict theory, the purpose of this study is to analyzes the innovative behavior of family firms from the perspective of the cognitive…
Abstract
Purpose
Grounded in upper echelons theory (UET) and conflict theory, the purpose of this study is to analyzes the innovative behavior of family firms from the perspective of the cognitive differences between successors and senior managers.
Design/methodology/approach
This research employed a sample listed family firms in China. The obtained results were subjected to hierarchical regression analysis, complemented by rigorous model robustness testing through propensity score matching and regression with substitution variables.
Findings
Successors engender task conflicts with family members in the top management team (TMT) due to cognitive differences, thereby stimulating corporate innovation. Conversely, successors engender relationship conflicts with non-family members in the TMT, impeding innovation. Furthermore, the performance expectations and the gender of the successor CEO also influence the relationship between cognitive differences and innovation between the successor and the TMT.
Originality/value
This study's originality and value lie in its innovative application of UET and conflict perspectives to dissect the intricate layers of intergenerational cognitive differences and their impact on the innovative behavior of family firms. It augments our comprehension of how the internal dynamics within family firms shape strategic innovation decisions.
Details
Keywords
Sachin Batra and Aritra Halder
The construction industry has more propensity to negatively affect employees’ physical–mental well-being due to the inherently intense and demanding nature of the work involved…
Abstract
Purpose
The construction industry has more propensity to negatively affect employees’ physical–mental well-being due to the inherently intense and demanding nature of the work involved. Digitalization can streamline the construction processes, and reduce stress, overtime and overall job-related pressure generated due to the nature of employment, contributing to the well-being of employees. Hence, the authors examined how digitalization, technostress and individual resilience could contribute to construction professionals’ physical–mental well-being using the transaction model of stress, self-determination theory and job-demand resources theory.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were collected from 86 young professionals using a structured survey. The professionals were working in Indian construction organizations where digitalization is implemented extensively. The survey consists of 21 items to measure four latent variables namely digitalization, technostress, physical–mental well-being and individual resilience. The study employs a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach to examine the theoretical model empirically.
Findings
The results revealed that digitalization was positively associated with physical–mental well-being and negatively associated with technostress. Further, individual resilience was a moderating variable in the relationship between digitalization and technostress. Finally, technostress partially mediated the relationship between digitalization and physical–mental well-being.
Originality/value
Digitalization has emerged as a valuable tool to tackle these challenges and improve the overall well-being of construction personnel. In the present study, digitalization is found to augment the physical–mental well-being of young construction professionals. Also, digitalization helps to significantly reduce technostress, thereby improving the physical–mental well-being of young professionals.