The relationship between risk and homeland security financing: a survey of florida city managers and fire chiefs

Abstract

Survey findings from Florida reveal that larger, higher risk communities perceive greater budgetary trade-offs, a view that supports in part the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s recently implemented strategy in distributing its grants. Per expectations, city managers with graduate education saw higher levels of readiness and lower threat risk than fire chiefs. Consistent with prior research, cities were reprogramming and using existing funds rather than new levies for homeland security initiatives. This finding was buttressed by results that recently enacted property tax limits and cuts in federal aid were seen as the greatest challenges to increased funding. Contrary to mainstream public administration writing, our respondents stated that restrained funding rather than intergovernmental coordination was the biggest issue they faced in meeting homeland security needs. Overall, our respondents saw a low risk of terror threat, a perception that may represent an accurate read of the operating environment or an implicit belief that higher levels of government will provide significant assistance in the event of a major terrorist attack or other conflagration.

Citation

Reddick, C.G. and Frank, H.A. (2009), "The relationship between risk and homeland security financing: a survey of florida city managers and fire chiefs", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 524-549. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-21-04-2009-B002