Supplier performance measurement system use, relationship trust, and performance improvement: a dyadic perspective

Abstract

Purpose

Grounding on resource orchestration theory, this paper aims to study the relationship between the way buying companies use their supplier performance measurement systems and the performance improvements obtained from suppliers, with relationship trust identified as a mediator in the previous link.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors design a conceptual model and test it through structural equation modelling on a final sample of 147 buyer-supplier responses, collected by means of a dyadic survey.

Findings

Results suggest that the buyer company may achieve the most by balancing a diagnostic and interactive use of the measurement system, as they are both positively related to supplier performance improvement. Furthermore, relationship trust acts as a mediator in case of the interactive use, but not for the diagnostic. This type of use negatively affects relationship trust, due to its mechanistic use in the buyer-supplier relationship.

Originality/value

The authors’ results contribute to the current academic debate about supplier performance measurement system design and use by analyzing the impact of different supplier performance measurement system uses, and highlighting their relative impact on relationship trust and supplier performance improvement. From a methodological perspective, adopting a dyadic data collection process increases the robustness of the findings.

Citation

Maestrini, V., Patrucco, A.S., Luzzini, D., Caniato, F. and Maccarrone, P. (2021), "Supplier performance measurement system use, relationship trust, and performance improvement: a dyadic perspective", The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 1242-1263. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2020-0339