The Ban on Self Incrimination after the Saunders Judgment

Abstract

In most jurisdictions a suspect has the right to remain silent during criminal proceedings and he cannot be penalised for making false statements. This is loosely known as the ‘ban on self incrimination’ and is regarded as an important factor in due process protection of individuals subject to criminal proceedings. The right to silence applies only to the stage of criminal proceedings, and up to date it has surprisingly not been seriously debated. A criminal may have caused individuals and society major loss, damage or suffering; in principle one would expect that he would be obliged to assist in the clearing‐up of the case, particularly if this could ameliorate or repair the negative consequences of the crime. But this is not the way it is looked at. The suspect is under pressure, and must not be faced with the choice of lying or confessing.

Citation

Eriksen, M. and Thorkildsen, T. (1997), "The Ban on Self Incrimination after the Saunders Judgment", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 182-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025832