Citation
(2012), "Special issue on Social accountability and stakeholder engagement for sustainability: shaping organisational change in higher education?", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 25 No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj.2012.05925baa.001
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Special issue on Social accountability and stakeholder engagement for sustainability: shaping organisational change in higher education?
Article Type: Call for papers From: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Volume 25, Issue 2
Guest Editors:Dr Christian Herzig, Dr Jasmin Godemann and Prof. Jeremy MoonUniversity of Nottingham, UK
Prof. Jan Bebbington,University of St Andrews, UK
Higher education institutions are being increasingly called upon to play a leading role in moving all of us to a more sustainable future. They create economic, social and environmental impacts as they educate students, provide research, strengthen communities, operate their campuses and business, and influence behaviours that form today's and future society. It is a somewhat curious omission that higher education institutions have lagged behind other private and public organisations in being accountable for their social impacts for a long time. However, in the last few years there has been considerable progress in the way higher education institutions approach issues of social responsibility in education, research and their organisation. There is also an increasing understanding of public disclosure needs in relation to sustainability. Much less is known, however, about the linkages between the processes of social accountability and the level of organisational change within higher education.
Recent research that has explored initial linkages between sustainability initiatives of universities and organisational learning has revealed potential to initiate organisational change, emphasising the importance of making data available to the public (Albrecht et al., 2007; Gudz, 2004). Similarly, Gond and Herrbach (2006) argue that social accountability procedures -- seen as a learning rather than an adaptive process -- may lead to individual and organisational dynamic changes that foster organisational performance. They conclude that an important prerequisite is the creation of learning processes that involve a more critically reflexive process, where accepted rules, strategies and norms are questioned and improved (Argyris and SchÎn, 1978).
This Call for papers aims to explore how and under what circumstances social accountability systems intervene in organisational change and support higher education institutions on their way towards sustainability. In doing so, it seeks to enrich the literature on social accountability and organisational learning within the higher education setting, which is, in many ways, distinctive from research into other public and private settings (e.g. in terms of tenure, long-term employees, loosely coupled systems) (Kezar, 2005).
To better understand the effects of specific organisational structure and the interaction between different groups involved, we also call for closer examination of the effects of stakeholder engagement through dialogue within the contexts analysed. There is considerable research to suggest that stakeholder dialogue plays a vital role in social accountability mechanisms (Gray et al., 1997; Owen et al., 2001) and may produce tangible changes in organisations' practice (Burchell and Cook, 2006; Godemann and Michelsen, 2011). Less is known, however, about how stakeholder engagement within social accountability processes initiate and/or support organisational change. Bebbington et al. (2007) also criticise the absence of agreement on what types of stakeholder engagement facilitate incremental change in organisations. They propose that engagements within social accountability research can only be understood if researchers consider a number of interrelated contextual factors, such as institutional frameworks, power dynamics, epistemology, language and discourse heterogeneity, or community and identity. Following this, we want to explore how the ability to change through dialogic social accountability and different forms of stakeholder engagement is viewed at various levels of higher education institutions.
This special issue calls for contributions that investigate the logic of higher education institutions for adopting social accountability and stakeholder engagement techniques to foster organisational change. It intends to provide a platform for discussion and research into organisational and practical barriers to implementation of social accountability processes within higher education institutions and the implementation and effectiveness of different forms of stakeholder engagement. In this way, the special issue is expected to provide new fruitful insights into the links between "university social responsibility'', social accountability, stakeholder engagement, and organisational change for sustainability.
Some research questions that might be addressed in this special issue include, but are not limited to, the following:
- •
How can organisational change in higher education institutions be initiated and/or supported through social accountability processes and stakeholder engagement?
- •
What are higher education institutions' logics for adopting social accountability and stakeholder engagement techniques to foster organisational change?
- •
How can the relationships between the kind of learning process and the level of organisational change be described?
- •
What mechanisms promote and enhance social accountability and stakeholder engagement?
- •
What are the limits of these mechanisms and how might these challenges be resolved?
- •
What constitutes engagement with stakeholders and how do different forms of stakeholder representation and engagement affect different aspects of organisational change?
- •
What are the cultural and organisational barriers to the communication between stakeholders engaged in the social accountability process and to the overall change process, and how might these be resolved?
- •
How do individuals interact around and through forms of social accountability systems?
- •
Which accountability and engagement frameworks can help to advance the institutional capacity to sustain progress in the area of university social responsibility?
This special issue is open to papers from different academic disciplines that are theoretical, conceptual, or empirical in nature and present new insights and innovative ideas on the role of social accountability and stakeholder engagement to foster organisational change in higher education.Please note that this is not a call for papers on education for sustainable development. Our interest is in organisational responses to the challenge of sustainable transformation and the role of social accountability and stakeholder engagement processes therein.
Submission instructions
The submission deadline for this special issue is 31 July 2012.Manuscripts should be sent electronically by e-mail (in a word file format) to the Guest Editor: Dr Christian HerzigE-mail: christian.herzig@nottingham.ac.uk
The Editors welcome enquiries and declarations of interest in submitting as well as earlier submissions. All papers will be reviewed in accordance with AAAJ's normal procedures.
Further reading
Adomssent, A., Godemann, J. and Michelsen, G. (2007), "Transferability of approaches to sustainable development at universities as a challenge'', International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 385-402.
Adomssent, M., Godemann, J., Leicht, A. and Busch, A. (Eds) (2006), Higher Education for Sustainability. New Challenges from a Global Perspective, VAS Publishing, Frankfurt am Main.
Ball, A. and Bebbington, J. (2008), "Accounting and reporting for sustainable development in public service organizations'', Public Money and Management, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 323-6.
Ball, A. and Grubnic, S. (2007), "Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector'', in Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O'Dwyer, B. (Eds), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, London, pp. 243-65.
Creighton, S.H. (1998), Greening the Ivory Tower. Improving the Environmental Track Record of Universities, Colleges and Other Institutions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Daft, R.L. and Huber, G.P. (1987), "How organizations learn: a communication framework'', in Bacharach, S.B. and
DiTomaso, N. (Eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations. A Research Annual, Elsevier, Greenwich, CT, pp. 1-36.
Duke, C. (1992), The Learning University. Towards a New Paradigm? Open University Press, Buckingham.
Godemann, J. and Michelsen, G. (Eds) (2011), Sustainability Communication: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoretical Foundations, Springer, Dordrecht.
References
Albrecht, P., Burandt, S. and Schaltegger, S. (2007), "Do sustainability projects stimulate organizational learning in universities?'', International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 403-15.
Argyris, C. and SchÎn, D.A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Reading, MA.
Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B. and Thomson, I. (2007), "Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical approach'', Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 356-81.
Burchell, J. and Cook, J. (2006), "It's good to talk? Examining attitudes towards corporate social responsibility dialogue and engagement processes'', Business Ethics: A European Review, Wiley-Blackwell, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 154-70.
Gond, J.-P. and Herrbach, O. (2006), "Social reporting as an organisational learning tool? A theoretical framework'', Journal of Business Ethics, Nielson Journals Publishing, Vol. 65, pp. 359-71.
Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, R. and Zadek, S. (1997), "Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures'', Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 325-64.
Gudz, N.A. (2004), "Implementing the sustainable development policy at the University of British Columbia: an analysis of the implications of organisational learning'', International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 5, pp. 156-68.
Kezar, A. (2005), "What campuses need to know about organizational learning and the learning organization'', New Directions for Higher Education, Wiley-Blackwell, Vol. 131, pp. 7-22.
Owen, D. L., Swift, T. and Hunt, K. (2001), "Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting'', Accounting Forum, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 264-82.
Patterson, G. (1999), "The learning university'', The Learning Organization, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 9-17.
White, J. and Weathersby, R. (2005), "Can universities become true learning organizations?'', The Learning Organization, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 292-8.