Consumer well-being: a systematic literature review and future research directions

Atul Dahiya, Diptiman Banerji, Raffaele Filieri

Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC

ISSN: 2444-9695

Open Access. Article publication date: 26 November 2024

4580

Abstract

Purpose

Consumer well-being (CWB) is a flourishing area of research. It is an important field of study for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG-3 (Good Health and Well-Being). However, despite some recent reviews, there is a lack of a comprehensive overview of the broad themes emerging in the CWB literature. The study aims to thoroughly integrate and organize the fragmented existing literature on CWB by uncovering its emergent themes and their impact.

Design/methodology/approach

To address this gap, this study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of 166 peer-reviewed journal articles from 2013–2023 following the Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews protocol from the Scopus and Web of Science databases.

Findings

This study’s SLR uncovered seven themes: subjective well-being; psychological well-being; food well-being; financial well-being; environmental well-being; social well-being; and societal well-being. Further, this study identifies that these themes impact consumers on three levels: micro, meso and macro. Thus, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the emergent themes along the levels of impact.

Research limitations/implications

This paper anticipates that the study, which is a thorough overview of the CWB literature, will provide managers, academics and students with an introduction to the topic.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first articles that shows the themes of the CWB literature along the respective levels of impact and draws avenues for future research.

Objetivo

El bienestar del consumidor (CWB) es un área de investigación en auge. Es un campo de estudio clave para los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS), en particular el ODS-3 (Salud y Bienestar). Sin embargo, a pesar de algunas revisiones recientes, falta una visión general completa de los amplios temas emergentes en la literatura de CWB. El objetivo de este estudio es integrar y organizar exhaustivamente la literatura existente sobre CWB, revelando sus temas emergentes y su impacto.

Diseño/metodología/enfoque

Para abordar esta brecha, el estudio presenta una revisión sistemática de la literatura (SLR) de 166 artículos de revistas revisados por pares, publicados entre 2013 y 2023, siguiendo el protocolo SPAR-4-SLR, extraídos de las bases de datos Scopus y Web of Science.

Resultados

Nuestra SLR reveló siete temas: (a) bienestar subjetivo; (b) bienestar psicológico; (c) bienestar alimentario; (d) bienestar financiero; (e) bienestar ambiental; (f) bienestar social; y (g) bienestar societal. Además, identificamos que estos temas afectan a los consumidores en tres niveles: (i) micro, (ii) meso y (iii) macro. Así, este estudio proporciona una visión completa de los temas emergentes a lo largo de los niveles de impacto.

Limitaciones/Implicaciones para la investigación

Anticipamos que este estudio, que ofrece una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura de CWB, proporcionará a gestores, académicos y estudiantes una introducción al tema.

Originalidad/valor

Según nuestro conocimiento, este es uno de los primeros artículos que muestra los temas de la literatura de CWB junto con sus respectivos niveles de impacto y traza rutas para futuras investigaciones.

目的

消费者幸福感(CWB)是一个蓬勃发展的研究领域, 对可持续发展目标(SDGs), 尤其是 SDG-3(良好健康与幸福感), 具有重要意义。然而, 尽管近期已有一些综述, CWB 文献中出现的广 泛主题仍缺乏全面概述。本研究旨在深入整合和组织现有 CWB 文献, 通过揭示其新兴主题及其影响, 填补这一空白。

设计/方法论/方法

为解决这一问题, 本研究按照 SPAR-4-SLR 协议, 从Scopus和Web of Science数据 库中选取了 2013 年至 2023 年的 166 篇经过同行评审的期刊文章, 进行系统文献综述(SLR)。

发现

我们的文献综述揭示了七个主题:(a)主观幸福感; (b)心理幸福感; (c)食品幸福感; (d)金融幸福感; (e)环境幸福感; (f)社会幸福感; (g)社会整体幸福感。此外, 我们发现这些 主题在三个层面上影响消费者:(i)微观层面; (ii)中观层面; (iii)宏观层面。因此, 本研究提供 了沿影响层面的新兴主题的全面概述。

研究意义

我们期待这篇全面概述 CWB 文献的研究能为管理者、学者和学生提供关于该主题的全 面介绍。

原创性

据我们所知, 这是首篇阐释 CWB 文献主题及其相应影响层次的文章之一, 并为未来研究指 明了方向。

Keywords

Citation

Dahiya, A., Banerji, D. and Filieri, R. (2024), "Consumer well-being: a systematic literature review and future research directions", Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-12-2023-0355

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © Atul Dahiya, Diptiman Banerji and Raffaele Filieri.

License

Published in Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction

In our current evolving social, technological and economic landscape, scholars are confronted with emerging challenges that require immediate research attention. Among these, the concept of consumer well-being (CWB) has garnered significant traction because of its relevance to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aim to ensure good health and well-being for all. CWB refers to the satisfaction derived from the process of acquiring, owning, using, maintaining and disposing of consumer products (). Recognizing the importance of this concept, contended that businesses should take consumers’ well-being into account while making decisions, especially those pertaining to marketing. This emphasis on well-being in marketing is particularly important because marketing activities have the power to influence consumer behavior, perceptions and overall societal values. Consequently, CWB has been the subject of scholarly discussion for about 30 years now. Researchers from a range of disciplines, including business, public policy, psychology and marketing, have investigated the idea of CWB, and some of the major advances in the stream of CWB include subjective well-being, positive psychology, transformative consumer research, transformative service research and quality of life.

Several scholars have attempted to compile the existing body of knowledge on CWB in their literature reviews. For instance, provide an account of the historical origins and factors that shaped the evolution of the field of CWB. Taking a different route, focus on the well-being of students, examining the antecedents, decisions and outcomes of CWB as well as the theories, contexts and methods specifically related to “students-as-consumers” (p. 1564). Further, explore the antecedents [consumer-related factors (e.g. attitude and loyalty), context-related factors (e.g. brand-related and societal) and object-related factors (e.g. perceived value)] and consequences of well-being, various theories (for example, positive psychology and psychological life space theory), the temporal states of well-being in marketing and the connotations of “well-being, well-doing, well-having, and well-becoming” (p. 627). Finally, use the TCCM framework to summarize the theoretical perspectives (e.g. the usage of self-determination theory and attribution theory) research contexts (e.g. the country origin of the sample), constructs (the various IVs, mediating and moderating variables and DVs) and methods (e.g. interviews and ethnography) used in CWB research.

Despite these efforts to unify the existing literature on CWB, a comprehensive overview that highlights the overarching themes in current research is still lacking. This gap necessitates an in-depth synthesis and thematic understanding of the state of the art in CWB research. While the aforementioned reviews contribute significantly to the literature, our paper offers a distinct perspective. Our systematic literature review (SLR) identifies and discusses seven thematic areas along which CWB research has evolved, including:

  1. subjective well-being;

  2. psychological well-being;

  3. food well-being;

  4. financial well-being;

  5. environmental well-being;

  6. social well-being; and

  7. societal well-being.

Unlike Eshaghi et al.’s framework, which focuses on temporal states, our analysis delves into various dimensions of well-being, as they relate to consumers at the individual, interpersonal and societal levels.

Accordingly, the present study’s primary aim is to provide a comprehensive, state-of-the-art overview of the past, present and future of CWB research by unearthing its themes and levels of impact and exploring the major contexts of CWB research. In addition, this inquiry also offers an evaluation of the corpus performance using descriptive and bibliometric analysis. To assure the quality of our review, we conducted an SLR of peer-reviewed, empirical journal papers published between 2013 and 2023. As , p. 219) emphasize, we adhere to accepted standards and strive to maintain both rigor and relevance.

Following previous literature works published in leading journals (; ; ; ), this study begins by developing the research questions (RQs) it intends to address:

RQ1.

What is the corpus performance of CWB literature?

RQ2.

What are the major contexts of CWB articles?

RQ3.

What are the emergent themes and their impact as seen in CWB research?

RQ4.

What are the future research directions for CWB research?

RQ1 and RQ2 are straightforward and are addressed in Sections 4.1 and 4.2, respectively. In response to RQ3, in Section 4.3, we offer a synthesized overview of the state-of-the-art literature on CWB through its constituent themes. In addition, to address RQ4 (Section 4.4), we identify and discuss directions for future research that could encourage academic investigation in this field. Overall, this study aims to thoroughly integrate and organize the fragmented existing literature on CWB by addressing these research questions. This research enhances the comprehension of the current state-of-the-art and future directions of research on CWB.

2. Background

Consumer well-being is based on the notion that consumers satisfy their needs via various important activities spread across various life domains and sub-domains (). According to one of the most well-accepted definitions of CWB, it is:

A state in which consumers’ experiences with goods and services—experiences related to acquisition, preparation, consumption, ownership, maintenance, and disposal of specific categories of goods and services in the context of their local environment—are judged to be beneficial to both consumers and society at large (, p. 43).

CWB research investigates how consumption habits and lifestyle choices influence individuals’ overall happiness and satisfaction (). Employing a similar perspective, describe CWB as satisfaction in various sub-domains of a consumer’s life, while contend that life satisfaction is the cognitive component of CWB, whereas the affective component is about the balance between positive and negative affect. As a result, CWB is a desired state of subjective () and objective well-being. It includes various aspects of consumption () and broadly refers to the physical, psychological, social or economic situations of individuals or groups (; ; ). In other words, CWB is an inclusive state where consumer experiences with goods and services are beneficial to individuals at the micro-level () and society at the macro-level (). Adopting a nuanced and prudent perspective, highlights the considerable influence that marketing can have on consumers’ quality of life and argues that organizations must deliver consumer wants, needs and satisfaction in a way that enhances or at least preserves CWB.

From an economics viewpoint, CWB refers to the satisfaction of needs, i.e. the satisfaction derived from the consumption of a product or service, which implies that the degree of satisfaction is based on the degree to which a consumer’s needs are being catered to . As a matter of fact, CWB was once thought of as an economics-based concept of consumer sovereignty; however, later consumer well-being literature advanced to the understanding of cognitive and affective aspects (), then to various facets of human development and life satisfaction (, ) and then to societal aspects of consumer well-being (; ). Consumption ultimately has a significant impact on society, and underlines the significance of societal concepts in CWB.

3. Method

SLRs are evidence-based, scientific, replicable and transparent methods of secondary research that are used in reviewing existing research work through the identification of themes, topics and trends of the field under review (). We used the Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews (abbreviated as SPAR-4-SLR) for our review (). Adopting such a review protocol is crucial because it produces findings that are transparent and replicable (). There are three stages in the SPAR-4-SLR protocol, each of which is further divided into two steps (). The three stages of SPAR-4-SLR include assembling, arranging and assessing ().

The two sub-stages under assembly include the identification and acquisition of research articles. The identification stage starts with the selection of a review domain, which in our case is consumer well-being. The present investigation addresses four research questions (RQ1, RQ2, RQ3 and RQ4). For source type, we used empirical articles from journals because such articles are peer-reviewed sources of academic literature (; ). Books, book chapters, editorials, call-for-papers, conference papers and commentaries were not included because their peer-review status was not clear. Review articles were also excluded to avoid repeated reporting of insights (). Therefore, we ensure source quality with the use of peer-reviewed journal articles. The acquisition stage includes a Boolean search mechanism and material acquisition using two of the most comprehensive databases – Scopus and Web of Science – so that no relevant article is left outside the purview. The source period is between 2013 and 2023 (inclusive). The search keywords used were “Consumer” “Well-being” and “Consumer” “Wellbeing” in the “Title, Abstract, or Keywords” of articles. In total, we retrieved 2,602 articles on consumer well-being.

The second stage is arranging, which includes two sub-stages of organizing and delimitation of the retrieved articles. We organized the retrieved articles based on organizing codes such as article title, journal title, name of the authors, year, ABDC ranking, AJG ranking, field of research and author keywords. To achieve data purification, we used delimitations (inclusion and exclusion criteria) to arrive at a relevant and manageable number of articles for the review (the Delimitation Section of ). We began by removing 734 duplicate articles, which left us with 1,868 unique articles. Out of these 1,868 articles, we only included 844 articles whose field of research is “marketing.” Out of these 844 articles, we only included 684A* and A category articles based on ABDC journal rankings by eliminating B and C category journal articles. Out of these 684 articles, we only included 251 articles from 4*, 4 and 3 category journals based on AJG journal rankings and excluded 2 and 1 category journal articles.

After this, we performed abstract and full-text analysis, where we included a total of 152 articles (please refer to Web Appendix 1 for the complete list). At this step, we excluded articles that did not use consumer well-being as a central concept and just used the term in the title, abstract or keywords, for example, .

In addition, we conducted citation mining (also referred to as bread crumbing or pearl growing) on these 152 articles () and found 14 additional articles that met the criteria for inclusion in our review (the mined articles had to be cited in at least two of the 152 articles and more than ten times; please refer to Web Appendix 2 for the complete list of these 14 articles). So, in the end, we have a total of 166 articles that became part of the present review.

The third stage of the protocol is assessing, which includes two sub-stages of evaluation and reporting. In evaluation, we assessed empirical articles using descriptive and bibliometric analysis for corpus performance and thematic analysis for themes and future research directions. In the thematic analysis, we systematically extract qualitative data such as themes, sub-themes, levels of impact and implications from the retrieved articles to identify, analyze and report on them (; ; ). In reporting, our reporting conventions include texts, figures and tables. We also discuss limitations toward the end of this study.

4. Findings and discussions

As reported earlier, this review paper organizes its findings into four different sections. First, Section 4.1 discusses the CWB corpus performance (RQ1). Second, Section 4.2 delves into the major contexts found within the articles on CWB (RQ2). Third, Section 4.3 elucidates the emergent themes and their associated levels of impact (RQ3). Finally, Section 6 focuses on outlining the future research directions in the field of CWB (RQ4). This way, we aim to present the findings and discussions in a clear and organized fashion.

4.1 Corpus performance

In this section, we look at how the CWB corpus is performing, and to do so, we use descriptive analysis. Descriptive analysis () includes components such as:

  • year-wise distribution of the corpus;

  • journal-wise distribution; and

  • the top three countries with the most articles.

In the year-wise distribution (Part 1 of ) of CWB literature, we see a growing interest in the field. The year 2021 marks the highest number of articles (n = 31) in our corpus. Followed by the years 2023 with 26 publications and 2022 with 22 publications. The year-wise distribution shows an upward growth of the CWB literature from the initial year 2013 until 2023, with a significant spike in 2016. The reason for the spike in 2016 seems to be the adoption of the SDGs, including SDG-3 (Good Health and Well-Being) from January 1, 2016.

Further, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the world in 2020; during this phase, we saw exponential growth in CWB research (along with other scholarly publications) (; ). This spike in the number of CWB articles in 2020–2021 is potentially attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, as evidenced by several notable studies such as and .

The journal-wise distribution (Part 2 of ) indicates that CWB research is published in a variety of journals, but mainly in marketing (the top three being the Journal of Business Research, European Journal of Marketing and Journal of Public Policy and Marketing) and consumer behavior research (the top three being the Psychology and Marketing, Journal of Consumer Psychology and Journal of Consumer Research).

4.2 Major contexts and corresponding significant literature

In this section, we highlight a few contemporary and major contexts in which CWB has been studied. To do so, we provide the corresponding significant literature from the retrieved corpus in tabular format (see ). The present review identified four major contexts:

  1. Technology and social media: Understanding the intersection of technology and social media with consumer well-being is crucial for addressing the increasingly significant role these platforms play in shaping individuals’ mental health, behaviors and overall satisfaction with life.

  2. Mindfulness: This context is important because it explores how mindfulness practices can enhance consumer well-being by promoting conscious decision-making, reducing impulsive behaviors and fostering appreciation for products and their societal and environmental impacts.

  3. Health: This context explores the intricate interplay between consumer behaviors, environmental factors and personal choices in shaping health outcomes, crucial for informing strategies to enhance public well-being and mitigate health-related challenges.

  4. Minimalism and anti-consumption: The context of minimalism and anti-consumption explores the relationship between consumer behaviors, materialistic values and well-being, highlighting the impact of voluntary simplification and anti-consumption movements on individuals’ happiness and satisfaction levels amidst societal pressure for consumption-driven lifestyles.

4.3 Emergent themes and levels of impact

This section provides an overview of the emergent themes in the CWB literature. Our thematic analysis, which follows the recommendations of , has unearthed seven themes in the extant CWB literature, namely, subjective well-being, psychological well-being, food well-being, financial well-being, environmental well-being, social well-being and societal well-being. To offer a better understanding of the CWB landscape, we map the selected CWB literature in a two-dimensional matrix with all the emergent themes on one dimension and their levels of impact on the other (). The corresponding cells between these rows and columns show the areas of CWB research. We describe each of these themes in the subsections below.

4.3.1 Subjective well-being.

Subjective well-being (SWB) is people’s cognitive and affective evaluation of their lives (); in other words, it is a composite of one’s happiness and life satisfaction (; ). SWB as a construct includes three components: high positive affect (e.g. high energy and high pleasure), low negative affect (e.g. low energy and sadness) and life satisfaction (). An elaborate review of the corpus literature informs us that subjective well-being impacts consumers at all three levels: micro, meso and macro. Researchers have examined the impact of societal well-being on individual consumers, as evidenced by several notable studies such as ; ; and . Furthermore, the impact of subjective well-being extends to interpersonal relationships, such as those between couples or parents and children, as highlighted in previous research (). Finally, at a broader societal level, studies such as those by and have examined the welfare of consumers in communities and society at large.

At the micro level, consumers feel happiness as a result of their SWB, for instance when an individual performs intentional activities or goal-directed behaviors such as gift-giving (), which makes them feel satisfied or fulfilled (). Consumers feel satisfied when their basic needs are fulfilled within their given income; however, if they go outside their income sources and consume, that may not increase their well-being (). Consumers who use their income effectively have increased quality of life and happiness; for instance, minimalist consumers prefer simplicity and have reduced consumption, therefore providing possibilities for effective use of their incomes (). Similarly, digital inequalities (like unequal access or ability to engage with digital technologies) and type of internet access can affect the life satisfaction of other individuals ().

At the meso level, SWB articles explore concepts of shared decision-making () and relationship satisfaction (; ).

At a macro level, SWB researchers have explored concepts such as multi-cultural engagement (), political consumerism and religious commitment (), the life satisfaction of subsistence migrant consumers () and collective brand personification ().

4.3.2 Psychological well-being.

Psychological well-being is a broader construct than SWB. While SWB focuses on pleasure, pain avoidance and satisfaction, psychological well-being includes identity, meaning and relatedness (). Psychological well-being captures aspects of the positive or optimal functioning of an individual that are not seen in subjective well-being (; ). Psychological well-being also includes diverse aspects of human life such as the purpose of life, autonomy, personal growth, positive relations, self-acceptance and mastery (; ). Psychological well-being impacts consumers on all levels, be it micro, meso or macro.

At the micro level, it includes components such as self-acceptance, which is about a positive attitude toward oneself and various self-concepts (; ; ); personal growth, which refers to the need for development or improvement in an individual’s self and behavior over time; purpose of life, which is related to a strong orientation toward life goals and conviction toward the meanings of life; and autonomy, referring to the freedom to regulate behavior without social pressure; in other words, it is a sense of independence to regulate behavior without any social pressure. For example, a socially prescribed form of perfectionism, which means a form of pressure or influence from society to be perfect or to meet unrealistic standards, can lead to anxiety (). Another critical issue in psychological well-being is stress, which can impact an individual’s psychological well-being. For example, brand deprivation stress may influence consumers’ brand purchase intentions and their psychosomatic illnesses ().

At the meso level, psychological well-being includes the concept of positive relationships, which is related to interpersonal relationships based on empathy, intimacy and affection, for example, the idea of getting envied in a consumption context (). Similarly, and also add to this discourse.

At the macro level, psychological well-being includes components such as environmental mastery, which is about mastering environmental factors in a way that benefits personal needs, for example, spending and valuing time ().

4.3.3 Food well-being.

Food well-being is defined as a consumer’s positive relationship with food over time; such relationships can be personal or societal (). The five domains of food well-being include socialization aspects of food, food literacy, marketing aspects, policy aspects and availability of food (). In our corpus, we identify that food well-being has an impact on the micro and macro levels.

At the micro level, a consumer’s perception of food healthfulness and food well-being can be affected by the package coloring because vivid packaging is seen as an unhealthful heuristic (). Another aspect of packaging that can influence consumers’ food evaluations is labeling; for example, explore the influence of organic label structure along with the product type on consumers’ evaluations of organic foods. A similar study on labeling was conducted by , which examined the effects of providing both positive and negative information on the label. In another study on the effects of labeling, examine that calorie labeling might not affect average ordered calories because consumers can have varied food-value orientations such as quantity value or taste value orientations.

At the macro level, the dominant discourse on food well-being is related to food marketing and healthism (). In line with this discourse, used design-thinking concepts to co-create healthier food choices in supermarkets to encourage healthier food choices and well-being for consumers. Another study that focuses on a similar idea of co-design and co-creation looks at the interactive experiences of consumers when they co-design (). On a slightly different note, introduce the concept of experiential pleasure of food, which people gain by savoring a multi-sensory, communal and cultural meaning in their food consumption experience.

4.3.4 Financial well-being.

Financial well-being means “the perceived ability to sustain current and anticipated desires of the living standards and the financial freedom” (, p. 7). Our analysis of the articles on this theme reveals that financial well-being impacts consumers on all three levels: micro, meso and macro.

At the micro level, for an individual to increase long-term financial well-being, it is important to engage with financial information, such as information related to pensions (). shed light on the impact of saving habits on consumers’ financial well-being, which increases their ability to absorb some financial shocks. On the other hand, financial well-being can be jeopardized by the consumer’s risky indebtedness behavior ().

At a meso level, financial counseling and the consumer’s involvement foster co-production, which enhances the consumer’s financial well-being (). Similarly, examined several ways of engaging consumers in behavior-changing counseling services to enhance their financial well-being. highlight the importance of informational influence (by financial advisors) and eliciting a deliberative mindset (using financial brochures or educational programs) for saving that can enhance consumers’ financial well-being.

At the macro level, financial well-being includes concepts such as financial inclusivity. Financial inclusivity with financial service providers such as banks is significant for financial well-being (). Other notable contributions here include poverty alleviation by .

4.3.5 Environmental well-being.

Environmental well-being indicates the awareness and impact of one’s behavior on the environment and vice versa. For example, the awareness and impact of material consumption on the environment (). An extensive review of the corpus literature informs us that environmental well-being impacts consumers broadly on two levels: micro and macro.

At the micro level, mindful consumption can enhance environmental well-being, unlike mindless consumption, which can adversely impact environmental well-being (). A positive connection with the environment that can elicit drive and contentment is called a “friluftsliv” response. Such responses can enhance environmental well-being and can be created by adding green elements such as plants to consumer environments (). Similarly, neuroticism can impact a consumer’s compatibility with their environment, be it natural or urban ().

At the macro level, environmental well-being focuses on the ideas of sustainability (; ), green consumption and anti-consumption (; ; ) and voluntary simplicity and minimalism (; ; ).

4.3.6 Social well-being.

Social well-being has been defined as “the appraisal of one’s circumstances and functioning in society” (, p. 122), which consists of five dimensions: social acceptance, social actualization, social coherence, social contribution and social integration (). Thus, social well-being refers to developing, sharing and maintaining healthy and fulfilling relationships with others. A thorough review of our corpus of literature informs us that social well-being impacts consumers at two levels: micro and the broader, macro level.[

At the micro level, notable contributions to social well-being include the life satisfaction of migrant consumers (), refugee crises and refugee service experiences (), multi-cultural marketplaces (), multi-cultural collaborations () and social entrepreneurship ().

At the macro level, highlight how online service communities become a third place where consumers socialize and form relationships. shed light on social change in the context of obesity-related lived experiences of consumers.

4.3.7 Societal well-being.

Despite their apparent similarities, social and societal well-being refer to different ideas. While societal well-being is concerned with the health of society as a whole, including its economic, environmental and cultural components, social well-being is focused on the well-being of individuals and their social relationships (; ). The literature analysis indicates that consumers are only impacted by societal well-being at the macro level.

Notable contributions to societal well-being include poverty alleviation () and political consumerism (). Societal well-being is important because it takes the larger societal discourses into consideration; for example, propose a framework focusing on the power and deprivation felt by consumers in poverty. In another example, investigate the well-being of subsistence consumers migrating from rural to urban settings.

5. Conclusion

The systematic literature review on consumer well-being reveals a multifaceted and evolving field that intersects various disciplines, including business, psychology, marketing and public policy. This review highlights that consumer well-being has been studied majorly in the contexts of Technology and Social Media, Mindfulness, Health and Minimalism and Anti-consumption. The present review uncovers seven themes:

  1. subjective well-being;

  2. psychological well-being;

  3. food well-being;

  4. financial well-being;

  5. environmental well-being;

  6. social well-being; and

  7. societal well-being.

The theoretical implication of this review suggests that consumer well-being is not only important for individuals at micro-level but also for interpersonal relationships between consumers at meso-level and societies or communities at macro-level. This challenges traditional economic models that prioritize material wealth as a primary indicator of well-being. Studies show that consumers derive greater satisfaction from experiences rather than material goods, suggesting that a shift toward an experiential economy can be beneficial for well-being. Additionally, the role of digital platforms in shaping consumer well-being is increasingly significant, offering both opportunities and challenges. While digital engagement can provide social support and convenience, it also poses risks such as information overload and reduced face-to-face interactions.

Future research should continue to explore the dynamic nature of consumer well-being, especially in the context of technological advancements and global economic shifts. There is a need for longitudinal studies to understand the long-term impacts of various consumption patterns on well-being. Moreover, incorporating diverse cultural perspectives can enrich the understanding of how well-being is perceived and achieved across different societies.

6. Limitations and future research directions

This section includes the primary limitations of the present article (Subsection 6.1) and future research directions (Subsection 6.2) for the field of consumer well-being to grow.

6.1 Limitations

While using a rigorous technique for conducting a systematic literature review, it is crucial to recognize the study’s limits to facilitate the advancement of future research.

First, to enhance the comprehensiveness of forthcoming review studies, future researchers may consider examining more expanding databases in addition to Scopus and Web of Science. The inclusion of supplementary databases can potentially uncover new research, hence expanding the breadth and significance of the study. Therefore, we encourage subsequent researchers to consider using several databases to ensure a more comprehensive search strategy in future systematic literature reviews.

Second, the present review primarily focuses on identifying emergent themes and levels of impact in the literature related to CWB. While this approach provides valuable insights into the current state of the field, it does not cover the theories and methods that underpin CWB research. Therefore, future review articles in the CWB domain could benefit from focusing on these aspects. Such reviews could explore the various theoretical frameworks and research methods used in CWB research, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the field.

6.2 Future research directions

Our systematic literature review helps us propose important future research directions for the continued growth of the CWB domain.

First, a significant part of the research on CWB has focused on exploring the theme of subjective well-being (SWB). While this has produced some valuable insights, it has also resulted in tapered literature that has yet to shine the spotlight on the other themes of CWB. To produce richer literature, authors can undertake studies that focus on more than one theme, for example, a study that explores the implication of food waste on CWB using the lenses of food well-being as well as environmental well-being. By adopting such a comprehensive approach, researchers can provide a more holistic understanding of CWB.

Second, in SWB, the cognitive (life satisfaction and various life domains) and affective (positive or negative) aspects are mostly studied in relation to material consumption, hedonic consumption, social media consumption, and a few other studies focus on luxury customization, brand avoidance and materialistic values versus green values. An in-depth analysis of articles on this theme has revealed that recent studies have focused on topics such as anti-consumption, non-hedonic consumption and impulsive and compulsive buying. Future researchers can explore the effects of minimalism, voluntary simplicity and the consumption of technology such as augmented reality, virtual reality and the metaverse. For example, future scholars can investigate how adopting minimalist consumption behaviors, characterized by intentional simplicity and reduced material possessions, can influence SWB and the long-term happiness levels of consumers. Another potential research stream is the investigation of the long-term effects of immersive technologies, such as virtual reality and augmented reality, to find out how prolonged exposure influences social interactions and overall life satisfaction (; ). Furthermore, future researchers can explore the impact of levels of social media engagements or similar app engagements on consumer well-being ().

Third, psychological well-being, unlike SWB, focuses on long-lasting happiness; thus, the literature on this theme focuses mostly on the effects of negative emotions such as stress, anxiety and depression (). Based on extant literature, future investigations can look at the effects of emotion regulation strategies, for example, situation modification and distraction. In addition, as some consumers experience higher levels of stress than others, future research can focus on the role of self-efficacy and capabilities in this relationship. A few psychological well-being articles also focused on the effect of technology, such as AR technology and mobile usage, on well-being. Researchers have also encouraged the exploration of the negative aspects of AR technology and the impact of culture and gender identity on the augmented self (). Future scholars can also study the impact of technology such as mobile apps, changes in behavior, app engagements or levels of engagement on psychological well-being (; ; ). Importantly, future research can investigate how body art, tattoos, contact lenses, hearing aids, body mutilation and body modifications can impact the ideas of self through such consumptions. Additionally, researchers can investigate how temporal change brought about by things such as aging or accidents affects psychological well-being (; ).

Fourth, the food well-being articles in our collection center around topics such as packaging, labeling, perceived health benefits and the security of food. Underexplored dimensions of food well-being encompass waste management, food accessibility, poverty and co-creation (). Researchers have demonstrated a strong interest in food-related policies. By examining the long-term objectives of these policies, we can enhance the well-being of food. One specific long-term objective is to improve public health (). Subsequent researchers may direct their attention toward investigating the effects of unconventional objectives, such as diets. Furthermore, an examination can be conducted on the influence of social class and religion on the state of food well-being, perhaps leading to insights into the availability of food (). Furthermore, research on food well-being has primarily concentrated on individual health objectives. However, future investigations could shift their attention toward examining the influence of consumption disorders, such as drug misuse, on these health goals. Further research could investigate the efficacy of customized food labeling approaches, such as tailored nutritional suggestions derived from genetic or health information, in impacting customer welfare ().

Fifth, financial well-being articles focused mostly on various aspects of savings and saving automation, with a few articles concentrating on financial counseling and the co-production of financial well-being by the counselor, firm and consumer. As an important aspect of financial well-being is financial inclusion, future studies can examine the impact of communal financial orientation and the use of technology on financial inclusion (). Future studies can focus on the effect of behavior change on savings, the impact of self-knowledge and self-control on financial preparedness and the impact of message personalization on engagement behavior in financial services (). Future scholars can also examine the impact of widespread adoption of digital payment methods (such as mobile wallets and cryptocurrencies) on consumers’ financial well-being, investigating how these technologies influence spending habits (), financial management and overall financial satisfaction, considering potential benefits and risks ().

Sixth, the theme of environmental well-being, though of paramount importance as far as SDG 3 is concerned, is the least probed theme. Notable research on this theme is related to environmental compatibility, environmental disruption and environmental orderliness. Further, scholars have delved into the concept of mindfulness, and future researchers can study the impact of mindful consumption on environmental well-being (). Another study focuses on the impact of visual biophilic design elements to enhance consumer experience. Subsequent investigations may incorporate elements such as smell, sound and touch to assess the impact of non-visual biophilic[] design elements on consumer experience. Further research should also prioritize investigating the impact of biophilic designs on consumer decision-making ().

Seventh, social well-being articles, on the other hand, focus on aspects important for consumers’ well-being, such as poverty alleviation, social change, refugees and migrants. Future research can include examining the impact on other social groups, such as minorities and consumers with disabilities. Marketplace experiences can also be an interesting avenue for future studies (). Future research work should aim to understand the metaverse’s role in fostering social connections and alleviating isolation, providing insights into the significance of virtual communities for consumer social well-being (; ).

Eighth, an in-depth study of societal well-being articles suggests that future research can focus on the impact of technology growth, developmental goals, sustainability and environmental factors on societal well-being (). Future studies can also examine the implications of collaborative consumption platforms (e.g. sharing, renting and swapping) on consumer well-being and societal well-being.

Ninth, there are two dimensions vis-à-vis the meso levels of food well-being and environmental well-being which have not received attention yet. The present study proposes the following future research directions for each:

  • Meso-level food well-being: Future research directions in food well-being should delve into understanding the impact of family dynamics, food culture, social norms and peer influences on individuals’ dietary behaviors and overall well-being. Exploring these factors collectively can offer valuable insights into the social context of food consumption and inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at fostering supportive environments and promoting positive food-related behaviors at the interpersonal level.

  • Meso-level environmental well-being: Future research in environmental well-being at the meso level should focus on understanding the dynamics of social networks in promoting sustainable consumption, exploring effective interpersonal communication strategies for encouraging eco-friendly practices within social circles and investigating the impact of community empowerment initiatives on fostering grassroots environmental stewardship and resilience.

Finally, we use the two-dimensional CWB matrix to highlight the future research directions of the corresponding cells ().

Figures

The protocol followed for the current research (SPAR-4-SLR)

Table 1.

The protocol followed for the current research (SPAR-4-SLR)

Corpus performance based on descriptive analysis

Table 2.

Corpus performance based on descriptive analysis

Snapshot of the consumer well-being (CWB) literature on two dimensions: themes and the levels of impact

Table 4.

Snapshot of the consumer well-being (CWB) literature on two dimensions: themes and the levels of impact

Future research directions in consumer well-being

Table 5.

Future research directions in consumer well-being

Major contexts of CWB articles

Major context Significant literature
Technology and social media Adoption of smart wearable technologies for well-being (); Use of social networking services by older consumers to avoid social isolation (); Social Media Usage for psychological well-being (); Reality-enhancing technology and its impact on consumer experiences and well-being (); Effects of time spent on Instagram, a visual-based social media tool, on the gratitude, altruism, and willingness to donate (); Time-spent on social media and the prevalence of depression (); Impact of intentional sounds embedded within mobile applications (); Effects of augmented reality on consumer perception of the self, specifically the gap between actual and ideal attractiveness, and how this change affects psychological well-being and product choice (); Effects on users’ self-improvement goals and well-being when using technologies such as wearables or mobile apps (); Use of self-tracking technologies (STTs) in the context of professional services such as healthcare and fitness training, and how it affects consumers’ compliance with expert advice to improve their well-being (); the well-being of male Instagram users in the context of their exposure to fitness hashtags, where users’ perceptions of body image and behavior are affected by the exposure to fitness hashtags (); Virtual reality (VR) tourism (M. J. ); Techno-stress and subjective well-being (). Some other articles from our corpus which focusses on the contexts of technology and social media includes ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and
Mindfulness Mindfulness can reduce buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) usage by increasing consumers’ financial self-control and decreasing their impulse buying tendency (); When consumers self-create a product, they appreciate it more, consume it more mindfully and experience greater domain-specific and general well-being (); Mindful consumption (); Mindfulness in social media use (); Promoting and teaching mindful consumption can empower consumers to make more conscious choices and support personal, societal and environmental well-being ()
Health The role of personal values in healthy food choices can help food managers and health authorities reduce dietary stress and improve mental well-being (); The digital discourse of health is clustered around four F’s, namely, food, fitness, fashion and feelings, which can be categorized with respect to their degrees of representation on a commodification/communification versus bodily/spiritual well-being map (); Color elements of food packaging affect consumers’ perceptions of food well-being (); Visual perspectives have impact on maintaining a healthy diet and achieving health-related goals (); Insurance coverage and options can impact consumers’ Perceived Access to Health Services and ultimately, their well-being () and the Impact of wine consumption on health and well-being (); Work stress and the pandemic’s effect on health and well-being (). Some other articles discussing similar ideas includes ; ; and
Minimalism and anti-consumption Voluntary simplifiers refuse to consume items that do not add to their happiness and satisfaction levels (); The potential negative side-effects of the sustainability movement on the well-being of consumers with materialistic values is related to a reduced clarity of consumers’ self-concept (); Materialistic values and voluntary simplicity (); Anti-consumption and well-being theory (); Various anti-consumption constructs and consumer empowerment for well-being (). In addition to it, there are other articles that correspond to this context, including ; and Oral and Thurner

Notes

1.

Please note that social well-being and societal well-being (discussed below) are two different themes of CWB research, while the societal level refers to the broadest level at which CWB impacts, that is, at the level of a person’s society.

2.

Biophilia refers to the human tendency to interact with or be closely associated with other forms of life in nature.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found online.

References

Abrantes-Braga, F.D.M. and Veludo-de-Oliveira, T. (2020), “Help me, I can’t afford it! Antecedents and consequence of risky indebtedness behaviour”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 9, pp. 2223-2244.

Albrecht, C.-M., Stokburger-Sauer, N.E., Sprott, D.E. and Lehmann, D.R. (2017), “Adolescents’ perceived brand deprivation stress and its implications for corporate and consumer well-being”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 8, pp. 807-822.

Ashraf, M.A., Joarder, M.H.R. and Ratan, S.R.A. (2019), “Consumers’ anti-consumption behavior toward organic food purchase: an analysis using SEM”, British Food Journal, Vol. 121 No. 1, pp. 104-122.

Bahl, S., Milne, G.R., Ross, S.M., Mick, D.G., Grier, S.A., Chugani, S.K., Chan, S.S., Gould, S., Cho, Y.-N. and Dorsey, J.D. (2016), “Mindfulness: its transformative potential for consumer, societal, and environmental well‐being”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 198-210.

Baker, H.K., Pandey, N., Kumar, S. and Haldar, A. (2020), “A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: current status, development, and future research directions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 108, pp. 232-246.

Balderjahn, I., Lee, M.S., Seegebarth, B. and Peyer, M. (2020), “A sustainable pathway to consumer wellbeing: the role of anticonsumption and consumer empowerment”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 456-488.

Baron, S., Patterson, A., Maull, R. and Warnaby, G. (2018), “Feed people first: a service ecosystem perspective on innovative food waste reduction”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 135-150.

Bartikowski, B., Laroche, M., Jamal, A. and Yang, Z. (2018), “The type-of-internet-access digital divide and the well‐being of ethnic minority and majority consumers: a multi-country investigation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 82, pp. 373-380.

Batat, W., Peter, P.C., Moscato, E.M., Castro, I.A., Chan, S., Chugani, S. and Muldrow, A. (2018), “The experiential pleasure of food: a savoring journey to food well-being”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 100, pp. 392-399.

Berry, C., Burton, S., Howlett, E. and Newman, C.L. (2019), “Understanding the calorie labeling paradox in chain restaurants: why menu calorie labeling alone may not affect average calories ordered”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 192-213.

Bhardwaj, P. and Kalro, A.D. (2024), “Consumer well‐being—a systematic literature review and research agenda using framework”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 1-28.

Block, L.G., Grier, S.A., Childers, T.L., Davis, B., Ebert, J.E., Kumanyika, S., Laczniak, R.N., Machin, J.E., Motley, C.M. and Peracchio, L. (2011), “From nutrients to nurturance: a conceptual introduction to food well-being”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 5-13.

Blocker, C.P., Ruth, J.A., Sridharan, S., Beckwith, C., Ekici, A., Goudie-Hutton, M., Rosa, J.A., Saatcioglu, B., Talukdar, D. and Trujillo, C. (2013), “Understanding poverty and promoting poverty alleviation through transformative consumer research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66 No. 8, pp. 1195-1202.

Boenigk, S., Fisk, R., Kabadayi, S., Alkire, L., Cheung, L., Corus, C., Finsterwalder, J., Kreimer, A.A., Luca, N. and Omeira, M. (2021), “Rethinking service systems and public policy: a transformative refugee service experience framework”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 165-183.

Bogomolova, S., Carins, J., Dietrich, T., Bogomolov, T. and Dollman, J. (2020), “Encouraging healthier choices in supermarkets: a co-design approach”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55 No. 9, pp. 2439-2463.Scopus.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77-101.

Braxton, D. and Lau-Gesk, L. (2020), “The impact of collective brand personification on happiness and brand loyalty”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 10, pp. 2365-2386.

Brick, D.J., Fitzsimons, G.M., Chartrand, T.L. and Fitzsimons, G.J. (2018), “Coke vs Pepsi: brand compatibility, relationship power, and life satisfaction”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 991-1014.

Brick, D.J., Zhou, L., Chartrand, T.L. and Fitzsimons, G.J. (2021), “Better to decide together: shared consumer decision making, perceived power, and relationship satisfaction”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 387-405.

Brüggen, E.C., Hogreve, J., Holmlund, M., Kabadayi, S. and Löfgren, M. (2017), “Financial well-being: a conceptualization and research agenda”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 79, pp. 228-237.

Brunneder, J. and Dholakia, U. (2018), “The self-creation effect: making a product supports its mindful consumption and the consumer’s well-being”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 377-389.

Bublitz, M.G., Chaplin, L.N., Peracchio, L.A., Cermin, A.D., Dida, M., Escalas, J.E., Eilert, M., Gloukhovtsev, A. and Miller, E.G. (2021), “Rise up: understanding youth social entrepreneurs and their ecosystems”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 206-225.

Castro, I.A., Honea, H., Cornelis, E. and Majmundar, A. (2022), “The friluftsliv response: connection, drive, and contentment reactions to biophilic design in consumer environments”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 364-379.

Cavusoglu, L. and Demirbag-Kaplan, M. (2017), “Health commodified, health communified: navigating digital consumptionscapes of well-being”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 Nos 11/12, pp. 2054-2079.

Chan, S.S., Van Solt, M., Cruz, R.E., Philp, M., Bahl, S., Serin, N., Amaral, N.B., Schindler, R., Bartosiak, A. and Kumar, S. (2022), “Social media and mindfulness: from the fear of missing out (FOMO) to the joy of missing out (JOMO)”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 1312-1331.

Chang, C. (2020), “How branded videos can inspire consumers and benefit brands: implications for consumers’ subjective Well-Being”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 49 No. 5, pp. 613-632.

Chatzopoulou, E., Filieri, R. and Dogruyol, S.A. (2020), “Instagram and body image: motivation to conform to the ‘Instabod’ and consequences on young male wellbeing”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 1270-1297.

Choi, D., Seo, Y., Septianto, F. and Ko, E. (2022), “Luxury customization and self-authenticity: implications for consumer wellbeing”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 141, pp. 243-252.

Cleveland, M., Iyer, R. and Babin, B.J. (2023), “Social media usage, materialism and psychological well-being among immigrant consumers”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 155, p. 113419.

Cronin, J.M., McCarthy, M. and Delaney, M. (2015), “Deconstructing consumer discipline: how self-management is experienced in the marketplace”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49 Nos 11/12, pp. 1902-1922.

Cronin, J., McCarthy, M., Brennan, M. and McCarthy, S. (2014), “The bigger society: considering lived consumption experiences in managing social change around obesity”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 48 Nos 9/10, pp. 1558-1578.

Dahl, A.J., Milne, G.R. and Peltier, J.W. (2021), “Digital health information seeking in an Omni-channel environment: a shared decision-making and service-dominant logic perspective”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 125, pp. 840-850.

Daskalopoulou, I. (2014), “Consumer well-being”, Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 1221-1223.

De Vries, E.L., Fennis, B.M., Bijmolt, T.H., Ter Horst, G.J. and Marsman, J.-B.C. (2018), “Friends with benefits: behavioral and fMRI studies on the effect of friendship reminders on self-control for compulsive and non-compulsive buyers”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 336-358.

Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2008), “Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction”, Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 1-11.

Demangeot, C., Kipnis, E., Pullig, C., Cross, S.N., Emontspool, J., Galalae, C., Grier, S.A., Rosenbaum, M.S. and Best, S.F. (2019), “Constructing a bridge to multicultural marketplace well-being: a consumer-centered framework for marketer action”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 100, pp. 339-353.

Denyer, D. and Tranfield, D. (2009), “Producing a systematic review”.

Diener, E. and Ryan, K. (2009), “Subjective well-being: a general overview”, South African Journal of Psychology, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 391-406.

Diener, E., Lucas, R.E. and Oishi, S. (2002), “Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and life satisfaction”, Handbook of Positive Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 63-73.

Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J. and Arora, R. (2010a), “Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 99 No. 1, p. 52.

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S. and Biswas-Diener, R. (2010b), “New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 97 No. 2, pp. 143-156.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N. and Lim, W.M. (2021), “Research constituents, intellectual structure, and collaboration patterns in journal of international marketing: an analytical retrospective”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 1-25.

Duman, S. and Ozgen, O. (2018), “Willingness to punish and reward brands associated to a political ideology (BAPI)”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 86, pp. 468-478.

Eberhardt, W., Brüggen, E., Post, T. and Hoet, C. (2021), “Engagement behavior and financial well-being: the effect of message framing in online pension communication”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 448-471.

Elliot, E.A. and Cavazos, C. (2021), “Artrepreneurship and transmodernity”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 131, pp. 722-734.

Eshaghi, M.S., Afshardoost, M. and Bowden, J.L.H. (2023), “Consumer well-being (CWB): conceptualisation, contextualisation and a research agenda”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 43 Nos 9/10, pp. 618-641.

Etkin, J., Evangelidis, I. and Aaker, J. (2015), “Pressed for time? Goal conflict shapes how time is perceived, spent, and valued”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 394-406.

Farah, M.F. and Shahzad, M.F. (2020), “Fast-food addiction and anti-consumption behaviour: the moderating role of consumer social responsibility”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 379-392.

Fiore, M., Alaimo, L.S. and Chkhartishvil, N. (2020), “The amazing bond among wine consumption, health and hedonistic well-being”, British Food Journal, Vol. 122 No. 8, pp. 2707-2723.

FitzPatrick, M., Elphingston-Jolly, B., Friend, L. and Payne, P. (2019), “Possessions and self in the identity work of survivors of domestic violence”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 167-186.

Furchheim, P., Martin, C. and Morhart, F. (2020), “Being green in a materialistic world: consequences for subjective well-being”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 114-130.

Gallagher, M.W. and Lopez, S.J. (2007), “Curiosity and well-being”, The Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 236-248.

Garner, B., Thornton, C., Luo Pawluk, A., Mora Cortez, R., Johnston, W. and Ayala, C. (2022), “Utilizing text-mining to explore consumer happiness within tourism destinations”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 139, pp. 1366-1377, Scopus.

Griffith, D.A., Lee, H.S. and Yalcinkaya, G. (2022), “The use of social media and the prevalence of depression: a multi-country examination of value co-creation and consumer well-being”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 1-31.

Guo, L., Arnould, E.J., Gruen, T.W. and Tang, C. (2013), “Socializing to co-produce: pathways to consumers’ financial well-being”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 549-563.

Hasan, R., Lowe, B. and Petrovici, D. (2019), “An empirical comparison of consumer innovation adoption models: implications for subsistence marketplaces”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 61-80.

Ho, H. and Ito, K. (2019), “Consumption-oriented engagement in social network sites: undesirable influence on personal well-being”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53 No. 7, pp. 1355-1377.

Huang, Y., Chu, R. and Cheng, J. (2019), “Exploring life satisfaction among subsistence migrant consumers: a case in China”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 96-109.

Jain, A., Dash, S. and Malhotra, N.K. (2023), “Consumption coping to deal with pandemic stress: impact on subjective well-being and shifts in consumer behavior”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 5, pp. 1467-1501.

Javornik, A., Marder, B., Pizzetti, M. and Warlop, L. (2021), “Augmented self-The effects of virtual face augmentation on consumers’ self-concept”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 130, pp. 170-187.

Kang, W. and Shao, B. (2023), “The impact of voice assistants’ intelligent attributes on consumer well-being: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 70, p. 103130.

Kemp, E., Cowart, K. and Bui, M.M. (2020), “Promoting consumer well-being: examining emotion regulation strategies in social advertising messages”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 112, pp. 200-209.

Keyes, C.L.M. (1998), “Social well-being”, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 121-140.

Khatri, P. and Duggal, H.K. (2022), “Well-being of higher education consumers: a review and research agenda”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 46 No. 5, pp. 1564-1593.

Kim, M. (2021), “Does playing a video game really result in improvements in psychological well-being in the era of COVID-19?”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 61, p. 102577.

Kim, M.J., Lee, C.-K. and Preis, M.W. (2020), “The impact of innovation and gratification on authentic experience, subjective well-being, and behavioral intention in tourism virtual reality: the moderating role of technology readiness”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 49, p. 101349.

Kotler, P. (1986), “Megamarketing”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 64, pp. 117-124.

Kuanr, A., Pradhan, D. and Chaudhuri, H.R. (2020), “I (do not) consume; therefore, I am: investigating materialism and voluntary simplicity through a moderated mediation model”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 260-277.

Kuanr, A., Pradhan, D., Lyngdoh, T. and Lee, M.S. (2022), “Why do consumers subvert brands? Investigating the influence of subjective well-being on brand avoidance”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 612-633.

Kumar, S., Sureka, R., Lim, W.M., Kumar Mangla, S. and Goyal, N. (2021), “What do we know about business strategy and environmental research? Insights from business strategy and the environment”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 30 No. 8, pp. 3454-3469.

Lee, M.S. and Ahn, C.S.Y. (2016), “Anti-consumption, materialism, and consumer well-being”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 18-47.

Lee, D.-J., Sirgy, M.J., Larsen, V. and Wright, N.D. (2002), “Developing a subjective measure of consumer well-being”, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 158-169.

Lim, W.M., Yap, S.-F. and Makkar, M. (2021a), “Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: what do we know, how do we know, and where should we be heading? ”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 122, pp. 534-566.

Lim, W.M., Rasul, T., Kumar, S. and Ala, M. (2021b), “Past, present, and future of customer engagement”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 140, pp. 439-458.

Liu, C. (2019), “Men and their groomed body: understanding personal grooming as both a discursive and embodied practice”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 1015-1034.

Losada-Otálora, M. and Alkire, L. (2019), “Investigating the transformative impact of bank transparency on consumers’ financial well-being”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 1062-1079.

Lowe, M., Nikolova, H., Miller, C.J. and Dommer, S.L. (2019), “Ceding and succeeding: how the altruistic can benefit from the selfish in joint decisions”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 652-661.

Machin, J.E., Adkins, N.R., Crosby, E., Farrell, J.R. and Mirabito, A.M. (2019), “The marketplace, mental well-being, and me: exploring self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-compassion in consumer coping”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 100, pp. 410-420.

Maseeh, H.I., Sangroya, D., Jebarajakirthy, C., Adil, M., Kaur, J., Yadav, M.P. and Saha, R. (2022), “Anti-consumption behavior: a meta-analytic integration of attitude behavior context theory and well-being theory”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 12, pp. 2302-2327.

Matthews, A.L., Cockrell, S. and Walker, K.L. (2023), “Brand management of natural spaces: the impact of natural space authenticity on consumer outcomes”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 279-295.

Mead, J.A. and Richerson, R. (2018), “Package color saturation and food healthfulness perceptions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 82, pp. 10-18.

Mende, M. and Van Doorn, J. (2015), “Coproduction of transformative services as a pathway to improved consumer well-being: findings from a longitudinal study on financial counseling”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 351-368.

Mende, M., Salisbury, L.C., Nenkov, G.Y. and Scott, M.L. (2020), “Improving financial inclusion through communal financial orientation: how financial service providers can better engage consumers in banking deserts”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 379-391.

Mendini, M., Peter, P.C. and Maione, S. (2022), “The potential positive effects of time spent on Instagram on consumers’ gratitude, altruism, and willingness to donate”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 143, pp. 16-26.

Mick, D.G. (2008), “Introduction: the moment and place for a special issue”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 377-379.

Milne, G.R., Villarroel Ordenes, F. and Kaplan, B. (2020), “Mindful consumption: three consumer segment views”, Australasian Marketing Journal, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 3-10.

Moldes, O. and Ku, L. (2020), “Materialistic cues make us miserable: a meta-analysis of the experimental evidence for the effects of materialism on individual and societal well-being”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 37 No. 10, pp. 1396-1419.

Moorhouse, M., Goode, M., Cotte, J. and Widney, J. (2023), “Helping those that hide: anticipated stigmatization drives concealment and a destructive cycle of debt”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 60 No. 6, pp. 1135-1153.

Moriuchi, E. (2019), “Okay, google!: an empirical study on voice assistants on consumer engagement and loyalty”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 489-501.

Nanda, A.P., Banerji, D. and Singh, N. (2023), “Situational factors of compulsive buying and the well-being outcomes: what We know and what We need to know”, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 43 No. 3, p. 2761467231180091.

Nath, S.D., Jamshed, K.M. and Shaikh, J.M. (2022), “The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on subsistence consumers’, well‐being and coping strategies: insights from India and Bangladesh”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 180-210.

Newman, K.P. and Brucks, M. (2016), “When are natural and urban environments restorative? The impact of environmental compatibility on self-control restoration”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 535-541.

Newmeyer, C., Warmath, D., O’Connor, G.E. and Wong, N. (2021), “Is savings automation helpful to liquid savings? It depends on whether you have a savings habit”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 285-297.

Olson, J.G., Rick, S.I., Small, D.A. and Finkel, E.J. (2023), “Common cents: bank account structure and couples’ relationship dynamics”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 704-721.

Oral, C. and Thurner, J.-Y. (2019), “The impact of anti-consumption on consumer well-being”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 277-288.

Pala, E., Kapitan, S. and Esch, P. (2022), “Simulated satiation through reality‐enhancing technology”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 483-494.

Pancer, E. and Handelman, J. (2012), “The evolution of consumer well‐being”, Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 177-189.

Pangarkar, A., Shukla, P. and Charles, R. (2021), “Minimalism in consumption: a typology and brand engagement strategies”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 127, pp. 167-178.

Parker, J.R., Paul, I., Hamilton, R., Rodriguez-Vila, O. and Bharadwaj, S.G. (2021), “How product type and organic label structure combine to influence consumers’ evaluations of organic foods”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 419-428.

Parkinson, J., Schuster, L. and Mulcahy, R. (2022), “Online third places: supporting well-being through identifying and managing unintended consequences”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 108-125.

Parth, S., Manoharan, B., Parthiban, R., Qureshi, I., Bhatt, B. and Rakshit, K. (2021), “Digital technology-enabled transformative consumer responsibilisation: a case study”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55 No. 9, pp. 2538-2565.

Paul, J., Lim, W.M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A.W. and Bresciani, S. (2021), “Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR)”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. O1-O16.

Pera, R., Quinton, S. and Baima, G. (2020), “I am who I am: sharing photos on social media by older consumers and its influence on subjective well-being”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 782-795.

Pillai, R.G. and Krishnakumar, S. (2019), “Elucidating the emotional and relational aspects of gift giving”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 101, pp. 194-202.

Poupis, L.M., Rubin, D. and Lteif, L. (2021), “Turn up the volume if you’re feeling lonely: the effect of mobile application sound on consumer outcomes”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 126, pp. 263-278.

Raggiotto, F., Mazzoni, E., Benassi, M., Panesi, S., Vacondio, M., Filippi, S., Turati, A. and Benvenuti, M. (2023), “Mind the age gap! How problematic internet use affects adults’ and emerging adults’ well-being and prosocial consumer behavior”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 58 Nos 2/3, pp. 268-279.

Romani, S., Grappi, S. and Bagozzi, R.P. (2016), “The bittersweet experience of being envied in a consumption context”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50 Nos 7/8, pp. 1239-1262.

Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2001), “On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 141-166.

Ryff, C.D. and Keyes, C.L. (1995), “The structure of psychological well-being revisited”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 719-727.

Ryff, C.D. and Singer, B. (1996), “Psychological well-being: meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research”, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 14-23.

Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V. and Ahadi, S. (2002), “Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: integrating process models of life satisfaction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 82 No. 4, p. 582.

Schomburgk, L. and Hoffmann, A. (2023), “How mindfulness reduces BNPL usage and how that relates to overall well-being”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 325-359.

Seegebarth, B., Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I. and Wiedmann, K.-P. (2016), “The sustainability roots of anticonsumption lifestyles and initial insights regarding their effects on consumers’ well-being”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 68-99.

Shafqat, T., Ishaq, M.I. and Ahmed, A. (2023), “Fashion consumption using minimalism: exploring the relationship of consumer well-being and social connectedness”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 71, p. 103215.

Shahzad, M.F., Lee, M.S., Hasni, M.J.S. and Rashid, Y. (2022), “How does addiction of fast-food turn into anti-consumption of fast-food? The mediating role of health concerns”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 697-712.

She, L., Rasiah, R., Waheed, H. and Pahlevan Sharif, S. (2021), “Excessive use of social networking sites and financial well-being among young adults: the mediating role of online compulsive buying”, Young Consumers, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 272-289.

Silchenko, K. and Askegaard, S. (2020), “Powered by healthism? Marketing discourses of food and health”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 133-161.

Singh, P., Bala, H., Dey, B.L. and Filieri, R. (2022), “Enforced remote working: the impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 151, pp. 269-286.

Sirgy, M.J. (2001), Handbook of Quality-of-Life Research: An Ethical Marketing Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sirgy, M.J. (2008), “Ethics and public policy implications of research on consumer well-being”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 207-212.

Sirgy, M.J. and Lee, D.-J. (2006), “Macro measures of consumer well-being (CWB): a critical analysis and a research agenda”, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 27-44.

Sirgy, M.J. and Lee, D.-J. (2008), “Well-being marketing: an ethical business philosophy for consumer goods firms”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 77 No. 4, pp. 377-403.

Sirgy, M.J., Yu, G.B., Lee, D.-J., Wei, S. and Huang, M.-W. (2012), “Does marketing activity contribute to a society’s well-being? The role of economic efficiency”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 107 No. 2, pp. 91-102.

Sloane, P.D. and Zimmerman, S. (2021), “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific publishing”, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 484-488.

Song, S., Gonzalez-Jimenez, H. and Belk, R.W. (2021), “Extending Diderot unities: how cosmetic surgery changes consumption”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 745-758.

Stornelli, J., Pereira, B. and Vann, R.J. (2020), “Big picture, bad outcomes: when visual perspectives harm health goal pursuit”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 368-378.

Su, T., Tian, L. and Huebner, E.S. (2021), “The reciprocal relations among prosocial behavior, satisfaction of relatedness needs at school, and subjective well-being in school: a three-wave cross-lagged study among Chinese elementary school students”, Current Psychology, Vol. 40 No. 8, pp. 3734-3746.

Taheri, B., Pourfakhimi, S., Prayag, G., Gannon, M.J. and Finsterwalder, J. (2021), “Towards co-created food well-being: culinary consumption, braggart word-of-mouth and the role of participative co-design, service provider support and C2C interactions”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55 No. 9, pp. 2464-2490.

Tanner, E.C., Vann, R.J. and Kizilova, E. (2020), “Consumer-level perceived access to health services and its effects on vulnerability and health outcomes”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 240-255.

Tikkanen, H., Heinonen, K. and Ravald, A. (2023), “Smart wearable technologies as resources for consumer agency in well-being”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 58 Nos 2/3, p. 10949968221143351.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003), “Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 207-222.

Trivedi, J., Kasilingam, D., Arora, P. and Soni, S. (2022), “The effect of augmented reality in mobile applications on consumers’ online impulse purchase intention: the mediating role of perceived value”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 896-908.

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H. and Bondas, T. (2013), “Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study”, Nursing and Health Sciences, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 398-405.

Vecchi, M., Elf, P., Ueno, A., Dilmperi, A., Dennis, C. and Devereux, L. (2022), “Shall we dance? Recreational dance, well-being and productivity performance during COVID-19: a three-country study”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 56-72.

Veeck, A., Yu, H., Zhang, H., Zhu, H. and Yu, F.G. (2018), “Social eating patterns, identity and the subjective well-being of Chinese teenagers”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52 No. 12, pp. 2356-2377.

Voola, A.P., Voola, R., Wyllie, J., Carlson, J. and Sridharan, S. (2018), “Families and food: exploring food well-being in poverty”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52 No. 12, pp. 2423-2448.

Wilson-Nash, C., Pavlopoulou, I. and Wang, Z. (2023), “Selecting, optimizing, and compensating during lockdown: how older consumers use social networking services to improve social well-being”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 58 Nos 2/3, p. 10949968231155156.

Winterich, K.P. and Nenkov, G.Y. (2015), “Save like the joneses: how service firms can utilize deliberation and informational influence to enhance consumer well-being”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 384-404.

Wittkowski, K., Klein, J.F., Falk, T., Schepers, J.J.L., Aspara, J. and Bergner, K.N. (2020), “What gets measured gets done: can self-tracking technologies enhance advice compliance?”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 281-298.

Wolf, T., Jahn, S., Hammerschmidt, M. and Weiger, W.H. (2021), “Competition versus cooperation: how technology-facilitated social interdependence initiates the self-improvement chain”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 472-491.

Yu, J., Park, J. and Hyun, S.S. (2021), “Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on employees’ work stress, well-being, mental health, organizational citizenship behavior, and employee-customer identification”, Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 529-548.

Yu, Y., Peng, X. and Wang, L. (2023), “The impact of mobile payment on hedonic preference”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 58 Nos 2/3, p. 10949968221146997.

Zhao, T., Lu, Y., Wang, V.L., Wu, B., Chen, Z., Song, W. and Zhou, L. (2023), “Shared but unhappy? Detrimental effects of using shared products on psychological ownership and consumer happiness”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 169, p. 114306.

Zheng, Y., Bolton, L.E. and Alba, J.W. (2019), “Technology resistance: the case of food production processes”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 246-262.

Zheng, X., Ruan, C. and Zheng, L. (2021), “Money or love? The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on consumer life goals and subjective well-being”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 137, pp. 626-633.

Zhong, J.Y. and Mitchell, V.-W. (2012), “Does consumer well-being affect hedonic consumption?”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 29 No. 8, pp. 583-594.

Zhong, J.Y. and Mitchell, V.-W. (2013), “When having is not enough: implications of being satisfied”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47 Nos 11/12, pp. 1975-2001.

Zlatevska, N., Chowdhury, R.M., Tam, L. and Holden, S. (2019), “Facts-up-front: should food companies follow the FDA or industry label format? The effects of combining virtue and vice information on consumer evaluations”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 30 Nos 3/4, pp. 321-334.

Corresponding author

Diptiman Banerji can be contacted at: diptimanbanerji@gmail.com

Related articles