Citation
Hosseini, M.R. and Edwards, D.J. (2021), "Editorial", Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2021-184
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited
Integration of Internet of Things with building information modelling (IoT-BIM)
The construction industry is inextricably linked to a country's economy because it provides infrastructure and buildings that generate national wealth, social equality and productivity performance (Owusu-Manu et al., 2019). The industry is also one of the largest sectors of the global economy (Barbosa et al., 2017; Opoku et al., 2019), with construction-related spending accounting for 13% of the world's gross domestic product (GDP). The total annual revenue of the sector is estimated to be around US$10 trillion and is predicted to rise to US$14 trillion by 2025 (Hosseini et al., 2021). Despite this, the construction industry has an unenviable reputation for being wasteful, unsustainable and a major pollutant (Brandão et al., 2021), accompanied by unsatisfactory outcomes for project participants and wider society alike (Newman et al., 2020; Nikmehr et al., 2021). Construction productivity, in contrast to other sectors, has not grown over the last 30 years (Teicholz, 2013; Fathalizadeh et al., 2021). Moreover, poor data management and information exchange inflate project delivery costs by an unnecessary 10–15% (Allen Consulting Group, 2010) while global headlines ubiquitously berate the industry for its poor and unabated safety and quality record (Alizadehsalehi and Yitmen, 2021; Ghodoosi et al., 2021). These omnipresent challenges are further exacerbated by the trend for contemporary construction projects of increasing scale and complexity (Jafari et al., 2021) alongside clients' project requirements for higher quality at a lower cost (Abbasianjahromi et al., 2016).
To address these various challenges, the construction industry has begun to embrace digital technologies enshrined within the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) concept (Kumar et al., 2020; Newman et al., 2020). Adopting the Industry 4.0 concept has engendered a digital revolution in the workplace which seeks to transform traditional procedures and methods through automation (Ghosh et al., 2020; Wong et al., 2020). Integrating data and information on people and work processes across the entire asset life cycle (i.e. from conceptualisation to occupation or use) is a centrepiece of this initiative (Hosseini et al., 2018; Chileshe et al., 2019). Such data constitute the foundation upon which knowledge management within a learning organisation is based, and from this, emergent wisdom generated helps improve the sector's performance (Edwards et al., 2021).
Building information modelling (BIM) is one of the technologies spearheading the shift to Industry 4.0 in the construction industry (Dudhee and Vukovic, 2021). The BIM market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.5%, from US$4.5 billion to US$8.8 billion over the period of 2020–2025 (Casasayas et al., 2021). However, some have questioned the adequacy of using BIM in isolation, calling for the integration of BIM with other advanced technologies as a means of improving data management and information flows across projects (Hosseini et al., 2021). BIM has the inherent capacity to embrace a coalescence of inextricably linked cyber-physical systems that fully monitor, control and automate the design, construction and facility management phases of a project's whole life cycle. The Internet of Things (IoT) is particularly suited as a complement to BIM applications, providing an effective platform for transitioning the construction industry towards Industry 4.0 (Ghosh et al., 2020), moving it from a static, closed environment to a dynamic, web-based environment (Boje et al., 2020). Despite the desirability of BIM-IoT integration, the scarcity of research in this field of science makes it difficult to evaluate the exact nature of this integration and how successful it could be.
This special issue is therefore specifically designed to breathe much needed technological modernity into contemporary BIM research, whilst simultaneously forging stronger linkages with the concept of IoT against a background of Industry 4.0. The collection of twelve carefully selected papers presented in this special issue extends knowledge beyond the current constraints of contemporary narrative where BIM and IoT are treated as isolated and loosely coupled technological innovations. In so doing, these papers provoke broader polemic debate and raise awareness of the potential to achieve IoT-BIM.
Hosseini et al. (2021), in their position paper, urge a progression beyond the current narrative of isolated BIM towards a broader perspective, where BIM is paired with other methodologies through the convergence of emerging technologies. They advocate a transition from BIM to the new concept of digital engineering (DE), where a coalescence of technological innovations is assembled around BIM. The exclusive focus should be shifted, they argue, from modelling at project level to achieving a smooth flow of data among various technologies at program and businesses levels of analysis, thereby engendering new operational insight and knowledge towards securing a competitive advantage.
Elghaish et al. (2021) advance the agenda of integrating various technological innovations as a route to tackle the omnipresent challenges that plague the construction industry. A specific focus is given to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and immersive technologies. In their conceptual paper, they provide a cogent picture of a UAV and immersive technologies application(s) landscape in the construction industry, highlight use cases and provide a way forward for the integration of these digital advancements into everyday construction procedures.
Santos and Abrishami (2021) also call for further technological innovation integration – a recurrent theme of this special issue. The authors exclusively focus on IoT and blockchain and explore the emergent synergies between them, and also with other technologies, methods and platforms like BIM. They advocate for the creation of an environment to act as a single point of connection among all digital technologies adopted. The authors describe each of these technological innovations as a layer in their framework, to be consolidated into a multi-layered central depository that is hinged around BIM.
Oke and Arowoiya (2021) also advance the agenda of technology integration. They use a survey questionnaire to elucidate upon the perception of quantity surveyors, land surveyors, builders, architects and engineers on the maturity of applying IoT in the construction industry. Their findings reveal that IoT is mostly applied within the industry to BIM, construction management, remote usage monitoring, equipment services and repair, construction tools and equipment tracking. Moreover, the authors identify areas where IoT has permeated into procedures and processes and perhaps more importantly, where further implementation is needed.
The four abovementioned papers provide a holistic view and draw attention to some foundational aspects regarding the integration of various technologies in order to benefit construction projects. The remaining eight papers within this special issue however, present a detailed discourse on various applications and use cases of advanced digital technologies. Their focus is hence shifted from the question of “why?” to “how?” and “for what?” and in some greater detail. Of these, Ogunseiju et al. (2021) demonstrate a promising use case of applying a digital twin framework utilising wearable sensors to track the kinematics of workers' body segments. The authors proffer that ergonomic risk can be effectively communicated based on an augmented virtual replica within a worker's field of view. Palpable benefits derived from this advancement include reducing the ergonomic risks of the construction workforce through improved awareness.
Mahmoudi et al. (2021) showcase the enhancement of geotechnical surveys based on a spatial estimation of subsoil to customised data structures and integrating the ground models into digital design environments. The authors present a ground model consisting of voxels based on Revit-Dynamo to represent spatial uncertainties, employing the kriging interpolation method. Here, a real-life application of BIM in engineering is demonstrated, and its efficiency in identifying the geological risky locations of a model for further geological investigations is optimised.
Eiris et al. (2021) pinpoint the necessity for a visual representation of human decision-making processes during indoor building inspection flight operations with drones. They present their InDrone platform for collecting expert pilot data perceptions to characterise key pilot behaviours and decision-making patterns and trends for indoor building inspection flight operations. Their focus is on the concept of visual affordances to support the communication of human decision-making in indoor building inspection flights.
Johansen et al. (2021) present a method for automating management activities on construction sites, replacing manual procedures such as updating the completion update of activities. A novel location tracking sensor data collection method is used to ensure continuous data acquisition with minimal human involvement. A generic and non-site-specific knowledge base (KB) is created through domain expert interviews. They present an efficient approach with promising results, where simple data, domain knowledge and a logical reasoning system are used, instead of manually acquired or information-rich sensor data.
Xiong and Tang (2021) focus on the automation of dust monitoring in workplaces and effective mitigation measures for proactive dust control. They offer a novel methodological framework to overcome the challenges of insufficient imagery data for training computer vision algorithms to monitor construction dust. They present the details of a synthetic image generation method that incorporates virtual environments of construction dust for producing training samples. Their findings reveal that training dust detection algorithms (even based merely with synthetic images) can achieve acceptable performance.
Birgonul (2021) discusses the potential for enhancing energy efficiency and comfort maximisation through the use of existing BIM database and real-time information. A user-centric platform is proposed based on IoT that combines data about real-time indoor thermal information, real-time weather information and the user's body temperature. An occupant-operated tool is presented with details of its hardware, and software based on Revit-Dynamo. The value of the platform developed is the potential to operate the system without needing knowledge and skills of any BIM software or IoT.
Lamptey et al. (2021) shift attention to sustainability as a polemic issue that affects the construction industry. Their focus is Ghana, a setting lagging behind developed economies in advancing the agenda of sustainability. They call for further attention on developing green business models to facilitate a transition to a circular economy and a reduction in the carbon footprint of the construction industry. Various sources of information are introduced to drive awareness, understanding and adoption of green business models. The work culminates in a framework that integrates BIM and IoT into the components for green business models for construction firms.
References
Abbasianjahromi, H., Rajaie, H., Shakeri, E. and Kazemi, O. (2016), “A new approach for subcontractor selection in the construction industry based on portfolio theory”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 346-356, doi: 10.3846/13923730.2014.897983.
Alizadehsalehi, S. and Yitmen, I. (2021), “Digital twin-based progress monitoring management model through reality capture to extended reality technologies (DRX)”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-01-2021-0016.
Allen Consulting Group (2010), Productivity in the Buildings Network: Assessing the Impacts of Building Information Models, Report to the Built Environment Innovation and Industry Council, Sydney.
Barbosa, F., Woetzel, J., Mischke, J., Ribeirinho, M.J., Sridhar, M., Parsons, M., Bertram, N. and Brown, S. (2017), Reinventing Construction through a Productivity Revolution, McKinsey Global Institute, available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/reinventing-construction-through-a-productivity-revolution (accessed 12 September 2019).
Birgonul, Z. (2021), “A receptive-responsive tool for customizing occupant's thermal comfort and maximizing energy efficiency by blending BIM data with real-time information”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 504-535, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-11-2020-0175.
Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S. and Rezgui, Y. (2020), “Towards a semantic construction digital twin: directions for future research”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 114, 103179, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179.
Brandão, R., Edwards, D.J., Hosseini, M.R., Silva Melo, A.C. and Macêdo, A.N. (2021), “Reverse supply chain conceptual model for construction and demolition waste”, Waste Management and Research, Vol. 39 No. 11, pp. 1341-1355, doi: 10.1177/0734242X21998730.
Brandín, R. and Abrishami, S. (2021), “Information traceability platforms for asset data lifecycle: blockchain-based technologies”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 364-386, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-03-2021-0042.
Casasayas, O., Hosseini, M.R., Edwards, D.J., Shuchi, S. and Chowdhury, M. (2021), “Integrating BIM in higher education programs: barriers and remedial solutions in Australia”, Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 27 No. 1, 05020010, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000444.
Chileshe, N., Jayasinghe, R.S. and Rameezdeen, R. (2019), “Information flow-centric approach for reverse logistics supply chains”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 106, 102858.
Dudhee, V. and Vukovic, V. (2021), “Building information model visualisation in augmented reality”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-02-2021-0021.
Edwards, D.J., Akhtar, J., Rillie, I., Chileshe, N., Lai, J.H.K., Roberts, C.J. and Ejohwomu, O. (2021), “Systematic analysis of driverless technologies”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/JEDT-02-2021-0101.
Eiris, R., Albeaino, G., Gheisari, M., Benda, W. and Faris, R. (2021), “InDrone: a 2D-based drone flight behavior visualization platform for indoor building inspection”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 438-456, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-03-2021-0036.
Elghaish, F., Matarneh, S., Talebi, S., Kagioglou, M., Hosseini, M.R. and Abrishami, S. (2021), “Toward digitalization in the construction industry with immersive and drones technologies: a critical literature review”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 345-363, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-06-2020-0077.
Fathalizadeh, A., Hosseini, M.R., Vaezzadeh, S.S., Edwards, D.J., Martek, I. and Shooshtarian, S. (2021), “Barriers to sustainable construction project management: the case of Iran”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-09-2020-0132.
Ghodoosi, F., Bagchi, A., Hosseini, M.R., Vilutienė, T. and Zeynalian, M. (2021), “Enhancement of bid decision-making in construction projects: a reliability analysis approach”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 149-161.
Ghosh, A., Edwards, D.J. and Hosseini, M.R. (2020), “Patterns and trends in internet of things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 457-481, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2020-0271.
Hosseini, M.R., Jupp, J., Papadonikolaki, E., Mumford, T., Joske, W. and Nikmehr, B. (2021), “Position paper: digital engineering and building information modelling in Australia”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 331-344, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-10-2020-0154.
Hosseini, M.R., Roelvink, R., Papadonikolaki, E., Edwards, D.J. and Pärn, E. (2018), “Integrating BIM into facility management: typology matrix of information handover requirements”, International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 2-14, doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-08-2017-0034.
Jafari, K.G., Noorzai, E. and Hosseini, M.R. (2021), “Assessing the capabilities of computing features in addressing the most common issues in the AEC industry”, Construction Innovation, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 875-898, doi: 10.1108/CI-04-2020-0050.
Johansen, K.W., Nielsen, R., Schultz, C. and Teizer, J. (2021), “Automated activity and progress analysis based on non-monotonic reasoning of construction operations”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 457-486, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-03-2021-0044.
Kumar, A., Jain, S. and Yadav, D. (2020), “A novel simulation-annealing enabled ranking and scaling statistical simulation constrained optimization algorithm for internet-of-things (IoTs)”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 675-693, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-06-2019-0073.
Lamptey, T., Owusu-Manu, D.-G., Acheampong, A., Adesi, M. and Ghansah, F.A. (2021), “A framework for the adoption of green business models in the Ghanaian construction industry”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 536-553, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-08-2020-0130.
Mahmoudi, E., Stepien, M. and König, M. (2021), “Optimisation of geotechnical surveys using a BIM-based geostatistical analysis”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 420-437, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-03-2021-0045.
Newman, C., Edwards, D., Martek, I., Lai, J., Thwala, W.D. and Rillie, I. (2020), “Industry 4.0 deployment in the construction industry: a bibliometric literature review and UK-based case study”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-02-2020-0016.
Nikmehr, B., Hosseini, M.R., Martek, I., Zavadskas, E.K. and Antucheviciene, J. (2021), “Digitalization as a strategic means of achieving sustainable efficiencies in construction management: a critical review”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 9, p. 5040.
Ogunseiju, O.R., Olayiwola, J., Akanmu, A.A. and Nnaji, C. (2021), “Digital twin-driven framework for improving self-management of ergonomic risks”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 403-419, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-03-2021-0035.
Oke, A.E. and Arowoiya, V.A. (2021), “Evaluation of internet of things (IoT) application areas for sustainable construction”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 387-402, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-11-2020-0167.
Opoku, D.-G.J., Ayarkwa, J. and Agyekum, K. (2019), “Barriers to environmental sustainability of construction projects”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 292-306, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-08-2018-0040.
Owusu-Manu, D.-G., Jehuri, A.B., Edwards, D.J., Boateng, F. and Asumadu, G. (2019), “The impact of infrastructure development on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa with special focus on Ghana”, Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 253-273, doi: 10.1108/JFMPC-09-2018-0050.
Teicholz, P. (2013), “Labor-Productivity Declines in the Construction Industry: Causes and Remedies (Another Look)”, AECbytes Viewpoint, <https://www.aecbytes.com/viewpoint/2013/issue_67.html>. (24 October, 2021).
Wong, P.F., Chia, F.C., San Kiu, M. and Lou, E.C. (2020), “Potential integration of blockchain technology into smart sustainable city (SSC) developments: a systematic review”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-09-2020-0140.
Xiong, R. and Tang, P. (2021), “Machine learning using synthetic images for detecting dust emissions on construction sites”, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 487-503, doi: 10.1108/SASBE-04-2021-0066.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their thanks and gratitude to Dr Farzad Rahimian for his extensive contributions to the special issue, all the authors who submitted their papers and the reviewers for their time and effort.