To read this content please select one of the options below:

Managerial capture of sustainability assurance. Empirical evidence and capital market reactions

Marta Sánchez-Sancho (Instituto Multidisciplinar de Empresa (IME), Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain)
Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero (Instituto Multidisciplinar de Empresa, Facultad de Economia y Empresa, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain)
Javier Perote-Peña (Instituto Multidisciplinar de Empresa, Facultad de Economia y Empresa, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain)

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

ISSN: 2040-8021

Article publication date: 4 December 2023

Issue publication date: 2 February 2024

602

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the potential influence of managers on sustainability assurance. When the quality of sustainability reporting is questionable because of subsequent restatements, the authors explore whether assurance is used to enhance its credibility as a legitimization tool or as an impression management strategy. Additionally, the authors analyze how capital markets react to this potential managerial capture and, particularly, whether investors penalize this practice through the cost of capital.

Design/methodology/approach

Using an international sample from 2012 to 2016 and panel data regressions, this study relies on DICTION’s master variables of optimism and certainty to examine the impact of managers on assurance and the market’s reaction to these practices.

Findings

The study shows that some managers might use assurance as a legitimization tool rather than as a means of reinforcing the credibility of sustainability reporting. In such cases, the results reveal that investors penalize (reward) managerial influence (no influence) on assurance.

Practical implications

The new findings help companies understand that they will not improve their financing terms if investors perceive that managers have influenced assurance. Moreover, these findings emphasize the need for standardization to clarify assurance criteria and prevent managerial influence.

Social implications

Managerial influence on assurance raises doubts about its value in terms of reducing information asymmetry and especially improving investors’ decision-making.

Originality/value

The present study represents the first evidence of the potential use of assurance for non-informative purposes. The authors provide clear evidence of how investors penalize managerial influence on assurance, in contrast to the mainstream literature, which shows that this practice always improves investors’ decision-making and is rewarded.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Junta de Castilla y León and the European Regional Development Fund (Grant CLU-2019-03) for their financial support to the Research Unit of Excellence “Economic Management for Sustainability” (GECOS). The authors are grateful to the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación [Grant/Award No. PID2021-122419OB-I00-GELESMAT] for the financial support.

Citation

Sánchez-Sancho, M., Martínez-Ferrero, J. and Perote-Peña, J. (2024), "Managerial capture of sustainability assurance. Empirical evidence and capital market reactions", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 520-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2023-0309

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles