Engaged Research as Team Science Reflections From the ‘Researcher’ and the ‘Researched’

Abstract

In this chapter, we consider collaborative models of engaged research in comparison to models of team science that include persons with lived experience of the topic area as team members. ‘Co-led’, ‘co-design’ and ‘co-research’ are all terms used in the literature with distinct, but not precise, definitions and approaches. These collaborative models tend to describe methods that allow those with lived experience to be treated differently than other academic members of the research team. Power imbalances between those with lived experiences and researchers persist in such models, in spite of researcher efforts. For example, persons with lived experience are often described as being compensated with gift cards which may be welcomed but can be perceived as diminishing their role and contribution. In contrast, participatory team science involves persons with lived experience as full members of the research team. In the model that we propose, power is balanced through mutual planning and consensus-based decision-making. We contend that using participatory team science advances research through egalitarian consideration of team members' perspectives of the research problem and the designs necessary to knowledge development.

Citation

Geary, C.R. and Ordway, J. (2023), "Engaged Research as Team Science Reflections From the ‘Researcher’ and the ‘Researched’", O'Sullivan, R. (Ed.) Ethics and Integrity in Research with Older People and Service Users (Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Vol. 9), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820230000009009