To read this content please select one of the options below:

Critically Examining Inquiry-Based Learning: John Dewey in Theory, History, and Practice

Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators

ISBN: 978-1-78441-848-9, eISBN: 978-1-78441-847-2

Publication date: 19 May 2015

Abstract

This chapter introduces the history and development of inquiry-based learning (IBL) and describes how teaching and learning strategies over several decades in P-12 and higher education have built upon the ideas of John Dewey. Though personal reflection, uncertain learning paths and outcomes, and mindful inquiry have been central foundations undergirding IBL, the approach now stands upon the shoulders of theoretical and research giants such as Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. Over 100 years, modern IBL proponents like Gruenewald, have implemented and experimented, contributing to cognitive and social science pedagogy, for instance, by attempting to make contemporary teaching and learning relevant, thoughtful, and action-oriented.

Dewey’s work continues to dominate educational landscapes and inquiry-based approaches to teaching and learning have, in contemporary forms, withstood the test of time. Two case studies in this chapter illustrate how IBL has materialized as problem-based and place-based methodology, reflecting influences of social and cognitive constructivism, humanistic psychology, and eco-feminism. Those who embrace IBL continue to improve teaching and learning strategies in order to find more effective methods of immersing themselves and their students in globally critical conversations about essential life issues – inside and outside of classrooms – a central and enduring tenet of Dewey’s experiential learning.

Citation

Herman, W.E. and Pinard, M.R. (2015), "Critically Examining Inquiry-Based Learning: John Dewey in Theory, History, and Practice", Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 3), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120150000003016

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited